Original Articles

Validated Assessment Scale for Neck Volume

Sattler, Gerhard MD1; Carruthers, Alastair MD2; Carruthers, Jean MD3; Flynn, Timothy C. MD4,5; Geister, Thorin L. PhD6; Görtelmeyer, Roman PhD5; Hardas, Bhushan MD7; Himmrich, Silvia MSc6; Jones, Derek MD8; Kerscher, Martina MD, PhD9; Mohrmann, Cornelia MD6; Narins, Rhoda S. MD10,11; Pooth, Rainer MD, PhD6; Rzany, Berthold MD, ScM12; Buchner, Larry BA13; Benter, Ursula MSc14; Breitscheidel, Lusine MD, MPH14; de Maio, Maurício MD15

Author Information
Dermatologic Surgery 38(2 ptII):p 343-350, February 2012. | DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02253.x

Abstract

Background 

Sagging of the neck aesthetic area is an important indicator of age. The development of complex and globally accepted tools for proper assessment of the change in neck volume is an essential contribution to aesthetic research and the routine clinical setting.

Objective 

To develop a grading scale for the objective assessment of the neck volume and to establish the reliability of this scale for clinical research and practice.

Materials and Methods 

A 5-point rating scale was developed to assess neck volume objectively. Twelve experts rated frontal and lateral neck photographs of 50 subjects in two separate rating cycles using the neck volume scale. Responses of raters were analyzed to assess inter- and intrarater reliability.

Results 

Interrater reliability for the neck volume scale was almost perfect, with intraclass correlation coefficients for the first and second rating cycles of 0.85 and 0.84, respectively. Intrarater reliability for the neck volume scale was high (0.90) and Pearson correlation coefficients ranged between 0.88 and 0.95 and were statistically significant.

Conclusion 

The neck volume scale demonstrates optimal reliability for clinical research and practice.

© 2012 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid