Cross-sectional Imaging in Crohn Disease

References

• 1 Herlinger H, Caroline DF. Crohn’s disease of the small bowel. In: Gore RM, Lenine MS, eds. Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 2000; 726-745.
  Google Scholar
• 2 Wills JS, Lobis IF, Denstman FJ. Crohn disease: state of the art. Radiology 1997; 202:597-610.
  Google Scholar
• 3 Sandler RS, Golden AL. Epidemiology of Crohn’s disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 1986; 8:160-165.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 4 Bansal P, Sonnenberg A. Risk factors for colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91:44-48.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 5 Gore RM, Balthazar EJ, Ghahremani GG, Miller FH. CT features of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:3-15.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 6 Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Prassopoulos P. MR enteroclysis: technical considerations and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:2651-2658.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 7 Low RN, Sebrechts CP, Politoske DA, et al. Crohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single-shot fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 2002; 222:652-660.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 8 Low RN, Francis IR, Politoske , et al. Crohn’s disease evaluation: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and single-phase helical CT scanning. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11:127-135.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 9 Mako EK, Mester AR, Tarjan Z, Karlinger K, Toth G. Enteroclysis and spiral CT examination in diagnosis and evaluation of small bowel Crohn’s disease. Eur J Radiol 2000; 35:168-175.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 10 Raptopoulos V, Schwartz RK, McNicholas MM, Movson J, Pearlman J, Joofe N. Multiplanar helical CT enterography in patients with Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1545- 1550.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 11 Rollandi GA, Curone PF, Biscaldi E, et al. Spiral CT of the abdomen after distension of small bowel loops with transparent enema in patients with Crohn’s disease. Abdom Imaging 1999; 24:544-549.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 12 Turetschek K, Schober E, Wunderbaldinger P, et al. Findings at helical CT-enteroclysis in symptomatic patients with Crohn’s disease: correlation with endoscopic and surgical findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002; 26:488-492.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 13 Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, Umschaden M, Haselbach H. Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 2000; 215:717-725.
  Google Scholar
• 14 Lee J, Marcos HB, Semelka RC. MR imaging of the small bowel using the HASTE sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170:1457-1463.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 15 Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Maris T, Prassopoulos P. MR imaging of the small bowel with a true-FISP sequence after enteroclysis with water solution. Invest Radiol 2000; 35:707-711.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 16 Prassopoulos P, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Rousomoustakaki M, Mari T, Gourtsoyiannis N. MR enteroclysis imaging of Crohn disease. RadioGraphics 2001; 21:S161-S172.
  Google Scholar
• 17 Furukawa A, Yamasaki M, Yokoyama K, et al. CT diagnosis of ileocecal-appendiceal lesions. Radiologist 2001; 8:61-71.
  Google Scholar
• 18 Desai RK, Tagliabue JR, Wegryn SA, et al. CT evaluation of wall thickening in the alimentary tract. RadioGraphics 1991; 11:771-783.
  Google Scholar
• 19 Balthazar EJ. CT of the gastrointestinal tract: principles and interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 156:23-32.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 20 Low RN, Francis IR. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with IV gadolinium and dilute barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1051-1059.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 21 Herliger H, Maglinte DDT. The small bowel enema with methylcellulose. In: Herliger H, Maglinte DDT, eds. Clinical radiology of the small intestine. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1989; 119-137.
  Google Scholar
• 22 Del Campo L, Arribas I, Valbuena M, Mate J, Moreno-Otero R. Spiral CT findings in active and remission phases in patients with Crohn disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001; 25:792-797.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 23 Lee SS, Ha HK, Yang SK, et al. CT of prominent pericolic or perienteric vasculature in patients with Crohn’s disease: correlation with clinical disease activity and findings on barium studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179:1029-1036.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 24 Schunk K, Kern A, Oberholzer K, et al. Hydro-MRI in Crohn’s disease: appraisal of disease activity. Invest Radiol 2000; 35:431-437.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 25 Maccioni F, Viscido A, Broglia L, et al. Evaluation of Crohn disease activity with magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 2000; 25:219-228.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 26 Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, et al. MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:1325-1332.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 27 Maglinte DD, Bender GN, Heitkamp DE, Lappas JC, Kelvin FM. Multidetector-row helical CT enteroclysis. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41:249-262.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 28 Umschaden HW, Gasser J. MR enteroclysis. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41:231-248.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 29 Maglinte DDT, Herlinger H. Single contrast and biphasic enteroclysis. In: Herlinger H, Maglinte DDT, eds. Clinical radiology of the small intestine. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders, 1989; 295-334.
  Google Scholar
• 30 Giovagnoni A, Fabbri A, Maccioni F. Oral contrast agents in MRI of the gastrointestinal tract. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27:367-375.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 31 Papanikolaou N, Prassopoulos P, Grammatikakis J, Maris T, Kouroumalis E, Gourtsoyiannis N. Optimization of a contrast medium suitable for conventional enteroclysis, MR enteroclysis, and virtual MR enteroscopy. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27:517-522.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 32 Maccioni F, Viscido A, Marini M, Caprilli R. MRI evaluation of Crohn’s disease of the small and large bowel with the use of negative superparamagnetic oral contrast agents. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27:384-393.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 33 Holzknecht N, Helmberger T, von Ritter C, Gauger J, Faber S, Reiser M. Breathhold MRI of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease after enteroclysis with oral magnetic particles. Radiologe 1998; 38:29-36.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 34 Mattrey RF, Trambert MA, Brown JJ, et al. Perflubron as an oral contrast agent for MR imaging: results of a phase III clinical trial. Radiology 1994; 191:841-848.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 35 Rieber A, Aschoff A, Nussle K, et al. MRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:1377- 1382.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 36 Kivelitz D, Gehl HB, Heuck A, et al. Ferric ammonium citrate as a positive bowel contrast agent for MR imaging of the upper abdomen: safety and diagnostic efficacy. Acta Radiol 1999; 40:429-435.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 37 Karantanas A, Papanikolaou N, Kalef-Ezra J, Challa A, Gourtsoyiannis N. Blueberry juice used per os in upper abdominal MR imaging: composition and initial clinical data. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:909-913.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 38 Macari M, Balthazar EJ. CT of bowel wall thickening: significance and pitfalls of interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:1105-1116.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 39 Maglinte DD, Gourtsoyiannis N, Rex D, et al. Classification of small bowel Crohn’s subtypes based on multimodality imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41:285-303.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 40 Fishman EK, Wolf EJ, Jones B, et al. CT evaluation of Crohn’s disease: effect on patient management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987; 148:537-540.
  Medline Google Scholar