Introduction to the Language of Three-dimensional Imaging with Multidetector CT

References

• 1 NapelS. Basic principles of spiral CT. In: Fishman EK, Jeffrey RB Jr, eds. Spiral CT: principles, techniques, and clinical applications. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven, 1998; 3–15.
  Google Scholar
• 2 HsiehJ. A general approach to the reconstruction of x-ray helical computed tomography. Med Phys1996; 23: 221–229.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 3 HuH. Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction. Med Phys1999; 26: 5–18.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 4 ProkopM, Galanski M. Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body. New York, NY: Thieme, 2003.
  Google Scholar
• 5 RydbergJ, Liang Y, Teague SD. Fundamentals of multichannel CT. Radiol Clin North Am2003; 41: 465–474.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 6 CodyDD, Davros W, Silverman PM. Principles of multislice computed tomographic technology. In: Silverman PM, ed. Multislice computed tomography: a practical approach to clinical protocols. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002; 1–29.
  Google Scholar
• 7 McColloughCH, Zink FE. Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. Med Phys1999; 26: 2223–2230.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 8 SainiS. Multi–detector row CT: principles and practice for abdominal applications. Radiology2004; 233: 323–327.
  Google Scholar
• 9 FlohrT, Stierstorfer K, Bruder H, Simon J, Schaller S. New technical developments in multi-slice CT. I. Approaching isotropic resolution with sub-millimeter 16-slice scanning. Rofo2002; 174: 839–845.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 10 HuH, He HD, Foley WD, Fox SH. Four multi-detector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology2000; 215: 55–62.
  Google Scholar
• 11 BruderH, Kachelriess M, Schaller S, Stierstorfer K, Flohr T. Single-slice rebinning reconstruction in spiral cone-beam computed tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2000; 19: 873–887.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 12 FuchsT, Krause J, Schaller S, Flohr T, Kalender WA. Spiral interpolation algorithms for multislice spiral CT. II. Measurement and evaluation of slice sensitivity profiles and noise at a clinical multislice system. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2000; 19: 835–847.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 13 MaheshM. Search for isotropic resolution in CT from conventional through multiple-row detector. RadioGraphics2002; 22: 949–962.
  Google Scholar
• 14 KalenderWA, Polacin A. Physical performance characteristics of spiral CT scanning. Med Phys1991; 18: 910–915.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 15 RankinSC. Spiral CT: vascular applications. Eur J Radiol1998; 28: 18–29.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 16 RubinGD. 3-D imaging with MDCT. Eur J Radiol2003; 45(suppl 1): S37–S41.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 17 RubinGD, Dake MD, Semba CP. Current status of three-dimensional spiral CT scanning for imaging the vasculature. Radiol Clin North Am1995; 33: 51–70.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 18 KalenderWA, Polacin A, Suss C. A comparison of conventional and spiral CT: an experimental study on the detection of spherical lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr1994; 18: 167–176. [Published correction appears in J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994;18(4):671.]
  Medline Google Scholar
• 19 BrinkJA, Heiken JP, Balfe DM, Sagel SS, Di-Croce J, Vannier MW. Spiral CT: decreased spatial resolution in vivo due to broadening of section-sensitivity profile. Radiology1992; 185: 469–474.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 20 KalraMK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology2004; 230: 619–628.
  Google Scholar
• 21 PolacinA, Kalender WA, Marchal G. Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. Radiology1992; 185: 29–35.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 22 WangGM, Redford K, Zhao S, Vannier MW. A study on the section sensitivity profile in multi-row-detector CT. J X-Ray Sci Tech2003; 11: 1–11.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 23 RubinGD, Napel S, Leung AN. Volumetric analysis of volumetric data: achieving a paradigm shift [editorial]. Radiology1996; 200: 312–317.
  Google Scholar
• 24 RubinGD. Multislice imaging for three-dimensional examinations. In: Silverman PM, ed. Multi-slice helical tomography: a practical approach to clinical protocols. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002; 317–324.
  Google Scholar
• 25 RubinGD, Beaulieu CF, Argiro V, et al. Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging. Radiology1996; 199: 321–330.
  Google Scholar
• 26 KimDO, Kim HJ, Jung H, Jeong HK, Hong SI, Kim KD. Quantitative evaluation of acquisition parameters in three-dimensional imaging with multidetector computed tomography using human skull phantom. J Digit Imaging2002; 15(suppl 1): 254–257.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 27 NeyDR, Fishman EK, Magid D, Robertson DD, Kawashima A. Three-dimensional volumetric display of CT data: effect of scan parameters upon image quality. J Comput Assist Tomogr1991; 15: 875–885.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 28 RubinGD, Silverman SG. Helical (spiral) CT of the retroperitoneum. Radiol Clin North Am1995; 33: 903–932.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 29 CalhounPS, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Carley JC, Fishman EK. Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. RadioGraphics1999; 19: 745–764.
  Google Scholar
• 30 KellerPJ, Drayer BP, Fram EK, Williams KD, Dumoulin CL, Souza SP. MR angiography with two-dimensional acquisition and three-dimensional display: work in progress. Radiology1989; 173: 527–532.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 31 BoisellePM. Multislice helical CT of the central airways. Radiol Clin North Am2003; 41: 561–574.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 32 RamanR, Napel S, Beaulieu CF, Bain ES, Jeffrey RB Jr, Rubin GD. Automated generation of curved planar reformations from volume data: method and evaluation. Radiology2002; 223: 275–280.
  Google Scholar
• 33 RamanR, Napel S, Rubin GD. Curved-slab maximum intensity projection: method and evaluation. Radiology2003; 229: 255–260.
  Google Scholar
• 34 NapelS, Marks MP, Rubin GD, et al. CT angiography with spiral CT and maximum intensity projection. Radiology1992; 185: 607–610.
  Google Scholar
• 35 HeathDG, Soyer PA, Kuszyk BS, et al. Three-dimensional spiral CT during arterial portography: comparison of three rendering techniques. RadioGraphics1995; 15: 1001–1011.
  Google Scholar
• 36 KimJK, Kim JH, Bae SJ, Cho KS. CT angiography for evaluation of living renal donors: comparison of four reconstruction methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol2004; 183: 471–477.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 37 NapelS, Rubin GD, Jeffrey RB Jr. STS-MIP: a new reconstruction technique for CT of the chest. J Comput Assist Tomogr1993; 17: 832–838.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 38 RavenelJG, McAdams HP. Multiplanar and three-dimensional imaging of the thorax. Radiol Clin North Am2003; 41: 475–489.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 39 FishmanEK, Magid D, Ney DR, et al. Three-dimensional imaging. Radiology1991; 181: 321–337. [Published correction appears in Radiology 1992;182(3):899.]
  Google Scholar
• 40 MagnussonM, Lenz R, Danielsson PE. Evaluation of methods for shaded surface display of CT volumes. Comput Med Imaging Graph1991; 15: 247–256.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 41 van OoijenPM, van Geuns RJ, Rensing BJ, Bongaerts AH, de Feyter PJ, Oudkerk M. Noninvasive coronary imaging using electron beam CT: surface rendering versus volume rendering. AJR Am J Roentgenol2003; 180: 223–226.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 42 RubinGD, Dake MD, Napel S, et al. Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. Radiology1994; 190: 181–189.
  Google Scholar
• 43 RubinGD, Dake MD, Napel SA, McDonnell CH, Jeffrey RB Jr. Three-dimensional spiral CT angiography of the abdomen: initial clinical experience. Radiology1993; 186: 147–152.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 44 BolstadP. Terrain analysis. In: GIS fundamentals: a first text on geographic information systems. White Bear Lake, Minn: Eider, 2002; 297–298.
  Google Scholar
• 45 KuszykBS, Heath DG, Bliss DF, Fishman EK. Skeletal 3-D CT: advantages of volume rendering over surface rendering. Skeletal Radiol1996; 25: 207–214.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 46 FishmanEK, Drebin B, Magid D, et al. Volumetric rendering techniques: applications for three-dimensional imaging of the hip. Radiology1987; 163: 737–738.
  Google Scholar
• 47 LevoyM. Display of surfaces from volume data. IEEE Comput Graph Appl1988; 8: 29–37.
  Google Scholar
• 48 DrebinRA, Hanrahan P. Volume rendering. Comput Graph1988; 22: 65–74.
  Google Scholar
• 49 HohneKH. Shading 3D-images from CT using gray level gradients. IEEE Trans Med Imaging1986; 1: 45–47.
  Google Scholar
• 50 UdupaJK. Three-dimensional visualization and analysis methodologies: a current perspective. RadioGraphics1999; 19: 783–806.
  Google Scholar
• 51 FishmanEK, Drebin RA, Hruban RH, Ney DR, Magid D. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the human body. AJR Am J Roentgenol1988; 150: 1419–1420.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 52 FishmanEK, Magid D, Ney DR, Drebin RA, Kuhlman JE. Three-dimensional imaging and display of musculoskeletal anatomy. J Comput Assist Tomogr1988; 12: 465–467.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 53 VannierMW, Rickman D. Multispectral and color-aided displays. Invest Radiol1989; 24: 88–91.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 54 WardJ, Magnotta V, Andreasen NC, Ooteman W, Nopoulos P, Pierson R. Color enhancement of multispectral MR images: improving the visualization of subcortical structures. J Comput Assist Tomogr2001; 25: 942–949.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 55 BrownHK, Hazelton TR, Fiorica JV, Parsons AK, Clarke LP, Silbiger ML. Composite and classified color display in MR imaging of the female pelvis. Magn Reson Imaging1992; 10: 143–154. [Published correction appears in Magn Reson Imaging 1992;10(3):495.]
  Medline Google Scholar
• 56 BrownHK, Hazelton TR, Parsons AK, Fiorica JV, Berman CG, Silbiger ML. PC-based multiparameter full-color display for tissue segmentation in MRI of adnexal masses. J Comput Assist Tomogr1993; 17: 993–1005.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 57 BrownHK, Hazelton TR, Silbiger ML. Generation of color composites for enhanced tissue differentiation in magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Am J Anat1991; 192: 23–34.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 58 ClineHE, Lorensen WE, Kikinis R, Jolesz F. Three-dimensional segmentation of MR images of the head using probability and connectivity. J Comput Assist Tomogr1990; 14: 1037–1045.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 59 HaraAK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, Ehman RL, Il-strup DM. Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: two- versus three-dimensional techniques—work in progress. Radiology1996; 200: 49–54.
  Google Scholar
• 60 KimuraF, Shen Y, Date S, Azemoto S, Mochizuki T. Thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection: new endoscopic mode for three-dimensional CT display of aorta. Radiology1996; 198: 573–578.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 61 McAdamsHP, Goodman PC, Kussin P. Virtual bronchoscopy for directing transbronchial needle aspiration of hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol1998; 170: 1361–1364.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 62 SommerFG, Olcott EW, Ch’en I, Beaulieu CF. Volume rendering of CT data: applications to the genitourinary tract. AJR Am J Roentgenol1997; 168: 1223–1226. [Published correction appears in AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169(2):602.]
  Medline Google Scholar
• 63 ViningDJ, Zagoria RJ, Liu K, Stelts D. CT cystoscopy: an innovation in bladder imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol1996; 166: 409–410.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 64 SmithPA, Heath DG, Fishman EK. Virtual angioscopy using spiral CT and real-time interactive volume-rendering techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr1998; 22: 212–214.
  Medline Google Scholar
• 65 FishmanEK, Liang CC, Kuszyk BS, et al. Automated bone editing algorithm for CT angiography: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol1996; 166: 669–672.
  Medline Google Scholar