Warning: file_put_contents(/opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/storage/proxy/cache/95362622256cf99dea1fed235d9dfbc5.html): Failed to open stream: No space left on device in /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Arsae/CacheManager.php on line 36

Warning: http_response_code(): Cannot set response code - headers already sent (output started at /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Arsae/CacheManager.php:36) in /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Models/Response.php on line 17

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Arsae/CacheManager.php:36) in /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Models/Response.php on line 20
The Effect of Victim Attractiveness and Type of Abuse Suffered on Attributions of Victim Blame and Credibility in Intimate Partner Violence: A Vignette-Based Online Experiment - Maisie Hall, Agata Debowska, George K. Hales, 2024
Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 9, 2023

The Effect of Victim Attractiveness and Type of Abuse Suffered on Attributions of Victim Blame and Credibility in Intimate Partner Violence: A Vignette-Based Online Experiment

Abstract

Victims of intimate partner violence (IPV) are frequently blamed and disbelieved, which may affect their willingness to report their abuse experiences. This vignette-based online experiment examines whether victim attractiveness (attractive vs. unattractive) and the type of abuse suffered (psychological vs. psychological plus physical abuse) may impact attributions of victim blame or victim credibility. The final sample included 167 UK residents (79% females) aged between 18 and 66 years (M = 33.17, SD = 11.26). Results indicated that the attractive victim was judged as being more credible than the unattractive victim. Results are discussed in light of societal attitudes toward IPV.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Ansara D. L., Hindin M. J. (2010). Exploring gender differences in the patterns of intimate partner violence in Canada: A latent class approach. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 64(10), 849–854. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.095208
Bascandziev I., Harris P. L. (2014). In beauty we trust: Children prefer information from more attractive informants. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32(1), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12022
Blanca Mena M. J., Alarcón Postigo R., Arnau Gras J., Bono Cabré R., Bendayan R. (2017). Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema, 29(4), 552–557. http://hdl.handle.net/11162/151020
Brodsky S. L., Griffin M. P., Cramer R. J. (2010). The witness credibility scale: An outcome measure for expert witness research. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28(6), 892–907. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.917
Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Academic Press.
Debowska A., Horeczy B., Boduszek D., Dolinski D. (2020). A repeated cross-sectional survey assessing university students’ stress, depression, anxiety, and suicidality in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in Poland. Psychological Medicine, 52(15), 3744–3747. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329172000392X
Deitz S. R., Littman M., Bentley B. J. (1984). Attribution of responsibility for rape: The influence of observer empathy, victim resistance, and victim attractiveness. Sex Roles, 10(3–4), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287780
Dion K., Berscheid E., Walster E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033731
Edwards K. M., Dardis C. M. (2020). Disclosure recipients’ social reactions to victims’ disclosures of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(1–2), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516681155
Eigenberg H., Policastro C. (2016). Blaming victims in cases of interpersonal violence: Attitudes associated with assigning blame to female victims. Women & Criminal Justice, 26(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2014.997417
Eysenck S. B., Eysenck H. J., Barrett P. (1985). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90026-1
Gerdes E. P., Dammann E. J., Heilig K. E. (1988). Perceptions of rape victims and assailants: Effects of physical attractiveness, acquaintance, and subject gender. Sex Roles, 19(3–4), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290151
Glick P., Fiske S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
Gracia E. (2014). Intimate partner violence against women and victim-blaming attitudes among Europeans. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 92(5), 380–381. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.13.131391
Gracia E., Tomás J. M. (2014). Correlates of victim-blaming attitudes regarding partner violence against women among the Spanish general population. Violence Against Women, 20(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801213520577
Hamby S., Jackson A. (2010). Size does matter: The effects of gender on perceptions of dating violence. Sex Roles, 63(5–6), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9816-0
Hammock G. S., Richardson D. S., Williams C., Janit A. S. (2015). Perceptions of psychological and physical aggression between heterosexual partners. Journal of Family Violence, 30(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9645-y
Hand C. J., Scott G. G. (2022). Beautiful victims: How the halo of attractiveness impacts judgments of celebrity and lay victims of online abuse. Computers in Human Behavior, 130, Article 107157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107157
Illingworth H. (2007). Canadian resource centre for victims of crime: Brief to the CSC review panel. https://crcvc.ca/docs/CSC_Review_May07.pdf
Lang H. (2019). #Metoo: A case study in re-embodying information. Computers and Composition, 53, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.05.001
Lerner M. J., Miller D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85(5), 1030–1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030
Lim B. H., Valdez C. E., Lilly M. M. (2015). Making meaning out of interpersonal victimization: The narratives of IPV survivors. Violence Against Women, 21(9), 1065–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801215590670
Lipkus I. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(11), 1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90081-L
Ma D. S., Correll J., Wittenbrink B. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5
Marshall L. L. (1999). Effects of men’s subtle and overt psychological abuse on low-income women. Violence and Victims, 14(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.14.1.69
McGloin R., Denes A. (2018). Too hot to trust: Examining the relationship between attractiveness, trustworthiness, and desire to date in online dating. New Media & Society, 20(3), 919–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675440
McMahon S., Baker K. (2011). Changing perceptions of sexual violence over time. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.229.909&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Meyer S. (2016). Still blaming the victim of intimate partner violence? Women’s narratives of victim desistance and redemption when seeking support. Theoretical Criminology, 20(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480615585399
Miller A. K., Markman K. D., Amacker A. M., Menaker T. A. (2012). Expressed sexual assault legal context and victim culpability attributions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(6), 1023–1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511424493
Miller L. (2014). Rape: Sex crime, act of violence, or naturalistic adaptation? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2013.11.004
Minto K., Masser B., Louis W. (2021). Lay understandings of the structure of intimate partner violence in relationships: An analysis of behavioral clustering patterns. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(13–14), NP10810–NP10831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520986276
Nguyen T. T., Morinaga Y., Frieze I. H., Cheng J., Li M., Doi A., Hirai T., Joo E., Li C. (2013). College students’ perceptions of intimate partner violence: A comparative study of Japan, China, and the United States. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 7(2), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv-3023
Pedersen S. H., Strömwall L. A. (2013). Victim blame, sexism and just-world beliefs: A cross-cultural comparison. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20(6), 932–941. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2013.770715
Peters J. (2008). Measuring myths about domestic violence: Development and initial validation of the domestic violence myth acceptance scale. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 16(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926770801917780
Pinciotti C. M., Orcutt H. K. (2021). Understanding gender differences in rape victim blaming: The power of social influence and just world beliefs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(1–2), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517725736
Podaná Z. (2021). Patterns of intimate partner violence against women in Europe: Prevalence and associated risk factors. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 75(8), 772–778. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2020-214987
Prosman G. J., Lo Fo Wong S. H., Lagro-Janssen A. L. (2014). Why abused women do not seek professional help: A qualitative study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 28(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12025
Rogers P., Josey N., Davies M. (2007). Victim age, attractiveness and, abuse history as factors in the perception of a hypothetical child sexual abuse case. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 13(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600701644835
Rollero C., Tartaglia S. (2019). The effect of sexism and rape myths on victim blame. Sexuality & Culture, 23(1), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9549-8
Schmider E., Ziegler M., Danay E., Beyer L., Bühner M. (2010). Is it really robust? Methodology, 6(4), 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000016
Shaw J. I. (1972). Reactions to victims and defendants of varying degrees of attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 27(6), 329–330. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03328979
Spadine M., Patterson M. S., Brown S., Nelon J., Lanning B., Johnson D. M. (2020). Predicting emotional abuse among a sample of college students. Journal of American College Health, 70(1), 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1740709
Tieger T. (1981). Self-rated likelihood of raping and the social perception of rape. Journal of Research in Personality, 15(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(81)90014-3
Trabold N., McMahon J., Alsobrooks S., Whitney S., Mittal M. (2020). A systematic review of intimate partner violence interventions: State of the field and implications for practitioners. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018767934
Valor-Segura I., Expósito F., Moya M. (2011). Victim blaming and exoneration of the perpetrator in domestic violence: The role of beliefs in a just world and ambivalent sexism. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1.17
Verhulst B., Lodge M., Lavine H. (2010). The attractiveness halo: Why some candidates are perceived more favorably than others. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-009-0084-z
Weber M., Ziegele M., Schnauber A. (2013). Blaming the victim: The effects of extraversion and information disclosure on guilt attributions in cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(4), 254–259. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0328
Williams C., Richardson D. S., Hammock G. S., Janit A. S. (2012). Perceptions of physical and psychological aggression in close relationships: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(6), 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.005
Wilson J. M., Smirles K. (2020). College students’ perceptions of intimate partner violence: The effects of type of abuse and perpetrator gender. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(1–2), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520908025
Wilson R. K., Eckel C. C. (2006). Judging a book by its cover: Beauty and expectations in the trust game. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900202
Witte T. H., Schroeder D. A., Lohr J. M. (2006). Blame for intimate partner violence: An attributional analysis. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(6), 647–667. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2006.25.6.647
Zhao N., Zhou M., Shi Y., Zhang J. (2015). Face attractiveness in building trust: Evidence from measurement of implicit and explicit responses. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 43(5), 855–866. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.5.855

Biographies

Maisie Hall, MSc, is a postgraduate student of Psychology at the University of Sheffield. Her research focuses on intimate partner violence (IPV) and factors which influence judgments of IPV victims, IPV scenarios, and outsider willingness to intervene. She has a particular interest in psychological abuse and increasing community awareness around this subject.
Agata Debowska, PhD, is an academic at the SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities (Poland) and the University of Sheffield (United Kingdom). Her research focuses on intimate partner violence (IPV), child abuse and neglect (CAN), psychopathy, and criminal social identity.
George K. Hales, MSc, is a PhD student at University of Sheffield in the Department of Psychology. His current research interests include violence against children, adverse childhood experiences, and resilience. He is interested in exploring resilience in the context of childhood adversities.