Warning: file_put_contents(/opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/storage/proxy/cache/8321b5a7662fdd7d343293998d76e9a5.html): Failed to open stream: No space left on device in /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Arsae/CacheManager.php on line 36

Warning: http_response_code(): Cannot set response code - headers already sent (output started at /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Arsae/CacheManager.php:36) in /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Models/Response.php on line 17

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Arsae/CacheManager.php:36) in /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Models/Response.php on line 20
Tweeting the Russian revolution: RT’s #1917LIVE and social media re-enactments as public diplomacy - Rhys Crilley, Marie Gillespie, Alistair Willis, 2020
Skip to main content
Scheduled maintenance on Friday, 10th October and on Monday, 13th October. See what this means for you
Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online October 5, 2019

Tweeting the Russian revolution: RT’s #1917LIVE and social media re-enactments as public diplomacy

Abstract

Throughout 2017, the Russian state broadcaster, RT (formerly Russia Today), commemorated the centenary of the 1917 revolution with a social media re-enactment. Centred on Twitter, the 1917LIVE project involved over 90 revolution-era characters tweeting in real time as if the 1917 revolution was happening live on social media. This article is based on an analysis of a sample of tweets by users who engaged with 1917LIVE, alongside focus group discussions with its followers. We argue that a cultural studies perspective can shed important light on the political significance of RT’s social media re-enactment in ways that current studies of public diplomacy as a soft power resource often fail to do. It can advance soft power theory by offering a more nuanced, dynamic analysis of how state media mobilise, and how audiences engage with, social media re-enactments as commemorative events. We find that rather than promoting a unitary propagandistic narrative about Russia, 1917LIVE served instead to soften attitudes towards RT itself – encouraging audiences to view RT as an educator and entertainer as well as a news broadcaster – normalising its presence as a Russian public diplomacy resource in the international news media landscape. Our analysis of audience interactions with and interpretations of 1917LIVE affords insights into how the 1917 re-enactment worked as didactic entertainment eliciting affective identification with the characters of the revolution. Such public diplomacy projects contribute in the short term to a strengthening of the engagement required to create longer-term soft power effects.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Agnew V (2004) Introduction: What is reenactment? Criticism 46(3): 327–339.
Agnew V (2007) History’s affective turn: Historical reenactment and its work in the present. Rethinking History 11(3): 299–312.
Agnew V, Lamb J (eds) (2009) Settler and Creole Reenactment. New York: AIAA.
Ahmed S (2014) Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Barbour R (2008) Doing Focus Groups. London: Sage.
Bolin G, Miazhevich G (2018) The soft power of commercialised nationalist symbols: Using media analysis to understand nation branding campaigns. European Journal of Cultural Studies 21: 527–542.
Boyatzis RE (1998) Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. London: Sage.
Bruns A (2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. London: Peter Lang.
Bryman A (2008) Social Research Methods (3rd edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chatterje-Doody PN, Crilley R (2019) Populism and contemporary global media. In: Stengel FA, Nabers D, Macdonald DB (eds) Populism and World Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.73–99.
Clarke V, Braun V (2014) Thematic analysis. In: Teo T (ed.) Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology. London: Springer, pp.1947–1952.
Cook A (2004) The use and abuse of historical reenactment: Thoughts on recent trends in public history. Criticism 46(3): 487–496.
Cull N (2008) Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616: 31–54.
De Groot J (2011) Affect and empathy: Re-enactment and performance as/in history. Rethinking History 15(4): 587–599.
Doveling K, Scheve C, Von Konijn EA (2010) The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media. London: Routledge.
Drezov K (2018) Project 1917 and RT: The Russian revolution in the age of Facebook and Twitter. Journal of Global Faultlines 4(2): 163–166.
França A (2017). Available at: https://twitter.com/adrianoff/status/887381333051420672 (accessed 24 April 2019).
Gibbs G (2008) Analysing Qualitative Data. London: Sage.
Gillespie M, Nieto McAvoy E (2016) Digital networks and transformations in the international news ecology: A critique of agent-centred approaches to soft power. In: Chitty N, Ji L, Rawnsley GD, et al. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Soft Power. London: Routledge, pp.203–219.
Gillespie M, O’Loughlin B (2009) News media, threats and insecurities: An ethnographic approach. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22(4): 667–685.
Gillespie M, Gow J, Hoskins A, et al. (2010) Shifting securities: News cultures, multicultural society and legitimacy. Ethnopolitics 9(2): 239–253.
Grix J, Kramareva N (2017) The Sochi Winter Olympics and Russia’s unique soft power strategy. Sport in Society 20(4): 461–475.
Grix J, Lee D (2013) Soft power, sports mega-events and emerging states: The lure of the politics of attraction. Global Society 27(4): 521–536.
Hoskins A (2011) Media, memory, metaphor: Remembering and the connective turn. Parallax 17(4): 19–31.
Hunt E (2016) CIA ‘live tweets’ Osama bin Laden raid to mark five-year anniversary. The Guardian, 2 May. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/may/02/cia-live-tweets-osama-bin-laden-raid-anniversary (accessed 22 September 2017).
Hutchings S, Tolz V (2015) Nation, Ethnicity and Race on Russian Television: Mediating Post-Soviet Difference. London: Routledge.
Hutchings S, Gillespie M, Yablokov I, et al. (2015) Staging the Sochi Winter Olympics 2014 on Russia Today and BBC World News: From soft power to geopolitical crisis. Participations 12(1): 630–658.
Jackson A, Kidd J (eds) (2012) Performing Heritage: Research, Practice and Innovation in Museum Theatre and Live Interpretation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Just T (2016) Promoting Russia abroad: Russia’s post-cold war national identity and public diplomacy. The Journal of International Communication 22(1): 82–95.
Kempas B (2017). Available at: https://twitter.com/kempas/status/870377629295267840 (accessed 24 April 2019).
King K (2004) Historiography as reenactment: Metaphors and literalizations of TV documentaries. Criticism 46(3): 459–475.
King K (2012) Networked Reenactments: Stories Transdisciplinary Knowledges Tell. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Kiseleva Y (2015) Russia’s soft power discourse: Identity, status and the attraction of power. Politics 35(3–4): 316–329.
Kragh M, Åsberg S (2017) Russia’s strategy for influence through public diplomacy and active measures: The Swedish case. Journal of Strategic Studies 40(6): 773–816.
Krutka D, Milton MK (2013) The enlightenment meets Twitter: Using social media in the social studies classroom. The Ohio Social Studies Review 50(2): 22–29.
Lee VR, Shelton BE, Walker A, et al. (2012) ReTweeting history: Exploring the intersection of microblogging and problem-based learning for historical reenactments. In: Seo KK-J, Pellegrino DA, Engelhard C (eds) Designing Problem-Driven Instruction With Online Social Media. Charlotte, NC: IAP, pp.23–40.
Liñán MV (2010) History as a propaganda tool in Putin’s Russia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43(2): 167–178.
McCalman I, Pickering PA (eds) (2010) Historical Reenactment: From Realism to the Affective Turn. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Miazhevich G (2018) Nation branding in the post-broadcast era: The case of RT. European Journal of Cultural Studies 21: 575–593.
Mikula M (2015) Historical reenactment: Narrativity, affect and the sublime. Rethinking History 19(4): 583–601.
Miskimmon A, O’Loughlin B, Roselle L (2013) Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the New World Order. London: Routledge.
Morgan DL (1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Nye JS (2005) Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs.
Nye JS (2008) Public diplomacy and soft power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 616(1): 94–109.
Omelicheva M (2017) A new Russian holiday has more behind it than national unity: The political functions of historical commemorations. Australian Journal of Politics & History 63(3): 430–442.
Orttung RW, Nelson E (2019) Russia Today’s strategy and effectiveness on YouTube. Post-Soviet Affairs 35(2): 77–92.
Pamment J (2014) Articulating influence: Toward a research agenda for interpreting the evaluation of soft power, public diplomacy and nation brands. Public Relations Review 40(1): 50–59.
Pamment J, Cassinger C (2018) Nation branding and the social imaginary of participation: An exploratory study of the Swedish Number campaign. European Journal of Cultural Studies 21: 561–574.
Pears L (2016) Ask the audience: Television, security and Homeland. Critical Studies on Terrorism 9(1): 76–96.
Rawnsley GD (2015) To know us is to love us: Public diplomacy and international broadcasting in contemporary Russia and China. Politics 35(3–4): 273–286.
Roselle L, Miskimmon A, O’Loughlin B (2014) Strategic narrative: A new means to understand soft power. Media, War & Conflict 7(1): 70–84.
Rosen J (2012) The people formerly known as the audience. In: Mandiberg M (ed.) The Social Media Reader. New York: NYU Press, pp.13–16.
RT (2017a) Available at: https://twitter.com/RT_1917/status/815531771198603264 (accessed 23 April 2019).
RT (2017b) ‘So fascinating, so strange’: What the big hitters said about #1917LIVE. Available at: https://www.rt.com/news/414629-top-hitters-1917-live/ (accessed 26 April 2018).
RT (2018a) #1917LIVE – The Shorty Awards. Available at: http://shortyawards.com/10th/1917live (accessed 9 May 2018).
RT (2018b) #1917LIVE: What if Twitter existed 100 years ago? Available at: https://1917live.red/ (accessed 26 April 2018).
RTE (2016) RTE’s 1916: Announcing a year’s programming and events. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrCMPcZmA9Q (accessed 18 June 2019).
Rutland P, Kazantsev A (2016) The limits of Russia’s ‘soft power’. Journal of Political Power 9(3): 395–413.
Schneider R (2011) Performing Remains: Art and War in Times of Theatrical Reenactment. London: Routledge.
Simons G (2014) Russian public diplomacy in the 21st century: Structure, means and message. Public Relations Review 40(3): 440–449.
Smith R (2014) If Twitter had existed in 1914: Tweeting a crisis. In: History of government. Available at: https://history.blog.gov.uk/2014/08/07/if-twitter-had-existed-in-1914-tweeting-a-crisis/ (accessed 22 September 2017).
Solomon T (2014) The affective underpinnings of soft power. European Journal of International Relations 20(3): 720–741.
Stanley L (2016) Using focus groups in political science and international relations. Politics 36(3): 236–249.
Stanley L, Jackson R (2016) Introduction: Everyday narratives in world politics. Politics 36(3): 223–235.
Steele BJ (2017) Centenary (Inter)national, 1914–1924: The politics of commemoration and historical memory in international relations. Australian Journal of Politics & History 63(3): 339–344.
Stukal D, Sanovich S, Bonneau R, et al. (2017) Detecting bots on Russian political Twitter. Big Data 5(4): 310–324.
Tolz V, Teper Y (2018) Broadcasting agitainment: A new media strategy of Putin’s third presidency. Post-Soviet Affairs 34(4): 213–227.
Weiss M (2015) Russia’s propaganda blitzkrieg. The Daily Beast, 4 October. Available at: https://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/10/04/russia-s-propaganda-blitzkrieg (accessed 30 April 2018).
West B (2014) Historical re-enacting and affective authority: Performing the American civil war. Annals of Leisure Research 17(2): 161–179.
Wijermars M (2018) Project ‘1917 – Free history’: Reliving the Russian revolution in the digital age. Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media 18: 45–65.
Wilkinson S (2004) Focus Groups. In: Silverman D (ed.) Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice. London: Sage, pp.177–199.
Withers D (2014) Re-enacting process: Temporality, historicity and the women’s liberation music archive. International Journal of Heritage Studies 20(7–8): 688–701.
Yablokov I (2015) Conspiracy theories as a Russian public diplomacy tool: The case of Russia Today (RT). Politics 35(3–4): 301–315.
Yaron O (2013) Six day war breaks out, this time on Twitter. Haaretz, 5 June. Available at: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.527845
Zygar M (2017) Putin likes to pretend 1917 never happened. The Atlantic, 1 April. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2017/04/russia-putin-revolution-lenin-nicholas-1917/521571/

Biographies

Rhys Crilley is a post-doctoral research associate in Global Media and Communication at The Open University, UK. There he works on the AHRC-funded ‘Reframing Russia’ project. His research explores the intersections of popular culture, social media and global politics with a specific interest in war and legitimacy. Rhys has published several journal articles and he is currently working on writing his first monograph on the legitimation of war on social media. He tweets at @rhyscrilley.
Marie Gillespie is a professor of Sociology at The Open University. Her teaching and research interests revolve around media and migration, diaspora cultures, politics and social change. Her books include: Social Media, Religion and Spirituality, Diasporas and Diplomacy, Cosmopolitan Contact Zones at the BBC World Service, and Drama for Development: Cultural Translation and Social Change. Her recent research includes projects on forced migration and digital connectivity among Syrian and Iraqi refugees, and on culture and diplomacy in Egypt and Ukraine.
Alistair Willis is a senior lecturer in Computing and leads the Artificial Intelligence group in the School of Computing and Communications at The Open University, UK. His research interests focus mainly on natural language processing, especially on computational models of linguistic ambiguity and large-scale text and data analytics.