Warning: file_put_contents(/opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/storage/proxy/cache/9a607ef5626d28951b644157172b8a11.html): Failed to open stream: No space left on device in /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Arsae/CacheManager.php on line 36

Warning: http_response_code(): Cannot set response code - headers already sent (output started at /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Arsae/CacheManager.php:36) in /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Models/Response.php on line 17

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Arsae/CacheManager.php:36) in /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Models/Response.php on line 20
The Situational Strength Hypothesis and the Measurement of Personality - José H. Lozano, 2018

Restricted access

Research article

First published online July 10, 2017

Request permissions

The Situational Strength Hypothesis and the Measurement of Personality

José H. Lozano [email protected]View all authors and affiliations

Volume 9, Issue 1

https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617699256

Abstract

This study attempted to test the situational strength hypothesis and to investigate the extent to which situational strength determines the trait level at which situations are more discriminative. Twelve items aimed to assess cooperation were constructed based on 2 × 2 symmetric games with varying degree of situational strength. The sample comprised 704 participants. The interaction between social value orientation (SVO) and situational strength on cooperative behavior was analyzed using generalized estimating equations. The psychometric properties of the items were examined under an item response theory framework. The results were as follows: (1) although situational strength moderated the effect of SVO on behavior, the results did not consistently support the situational strength hypothesis; and (2) situational strength successfully predicted the item location parameter estimates, demonstrating its usefulness for personality measurement. The role of situational strength as a bridge between theory and measurement is discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Au W. T., Kwong J. Y. Y. (2004). Measurements and effects of social-value orientation in social dilemmas: A review. In Suleiman R., Budescu D. V., Fischer I., Messick D. M. (Eds.), Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas (pp. 71–98). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Balliet D., Parks C., Joireman J. (2009). Social value orientation and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 533–547.

Blanton H., Jaccard J. (2006). Arbitrary metrics in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 27–41.

Bogaert S., Boone C., Declerck C. (2008). Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A review and conceptual model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 453–480.

Botella J., Narváez M., Martínez-Molina A., Rubio V. J., Santacreu J. (2008). A dilemmas task for eliciting risk propensity. The Psychological Record, 58, 529–546.

Cooper W. H., Withey M. J. (2009). The strong situation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 62–72.

Embretson S. E. (2006). The continued search for nonarbitrary metrics in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 50–55.

Embretson S. E., Reise S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hambleton R. K., Swaminathan H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.

Hardin J. W., Hilbe J. M. (2001). Generalized estimating equations. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

Knez M., Camerer C. (2000). Increasing cooperation in prisoner’s dilemmas by establishing a precedent of efficiency in coordination games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 194–216.

Lozano J. H. (2016). Personality and behavior in social dilemmas: Testing the situational strength hypothesis and the role of hypothetical versus real incentives. Journal of Personality, 84, 71–78.

Marais I., Andrich D. (2008). Effects of varying magnitude and patterns of local dependence in the unidimensional Rasch model. Journal of Applied Measurement, 9, 1–20.

Masters G. N. (1982). A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.

McClintock C. G. (1978). Social values: Their definition, measurement, and development. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 121–137.

Messick D. M., McClintock C. G. (1968). Motivational basis of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1–25.

Mischel W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In Magnusson D., Endler N. S. (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333–352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Monson T. C., Hesley J. W., Chernick L. (1982). Specifying when personality traits can and cannot predict behavior: An alternative to abandoning the attempt to predict single-act criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 385–399.

Poundstone W. (1992). Prisoner’s dilemma: John von Neumann, game theory, and the puzzle of the bomb. New York, NY: Doubleday.

Rachlin H., Raineri A., Cross D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 233–244.

Rapoport A., Chammah A. M. (1966). The game of chicken. American Behavioral Scientist, 10, 10–28.

Robinson D., Goforth D. (2005). The topology of 2 × 2 games: A new periodic table. New York, NY: Routledge.

Santacreu J., Rubio V. J., Hernández J. M. (2006). The objective assessment of personality: Cattells’s T-data revisited and more. Psychology Science, 48, 53–68.

Schmitt M., Gollwitzer M., Baumert A., Blum G., Gschwendner T., Hofmann W., Rothmund T. (2013). Proposal of a nonlinear interaction of person and situation (NIPS) model. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 499.

Skyrms B. (2004). The stag hunt and the evolution of social structure. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Snyder M., Ickes W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In Lindzey G., Aronson E. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 883–947). New York, NY: Random House.

Tucker A. (2001). A two-person dilemma. In Rasmusen E. (Ed.), Readings in games and information (pp. 7–8). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Van Lange P. A. M. (1999). The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 337–349.

Van Lange P. A. M., Agnew C. R., Harinck F., Steemers G. E. M. (1997). From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1330–1344.

Van Lange P. A. M., Bekkers R., Schuyt T. N. M., Van Vugt M. (2007). From games to giving: Social value orientation predicts donations to noble causes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29, 375–384.

Van Lange P. A. M., De Bruin E. M. N., Otten W., Joireman J. A. (1997). Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientation: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 733–746.

Von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Biographies

José H. Lozano is now at Departamento de Psicología Social y Metodología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.

Handling Editor: Gregory Webster

View full text|Download PDF

You currently have no access to this content. Visit the access options page to authenticate.