Looking Good For Election Day: Does Attractiveness Predict Electoral Success in Britain?
Abstract
This article
•
Explores the relationship between perceptions of candidate attractiveness and election outcomes in Britain.
•
Uses a computer-based survey to evaluate subjects’ first impressions of real British candidates from the 2010 general election.
•
Looks at the perception that Conservative candidates and candidates who are relatively young are more attractive.
•
Concludes that attractive candidates were more moderately more successful, even when we control for other important determinants of electoral success.
What do British voters look for in their candidates? We know they favour candidates who have experience serving their constituents and those with local ties. As a result, parties often emphasise these characteristics in their campaign materials. However, these materials also provide voters with the candidates’ images. Using a survey where respondents are asked to evaluate real British candidates using only rapidly determined first impressions of facial images, we demonstrate that candidates who were deemed attractive enjoyed greater electoral success in the 2010 general election. Specifically, we find that candidates who are widely perceived to be more attractive had a higher vote share, even when we take into account the candidates’ age, party, incumbency and campaign spending.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
Bibliography
Ahola A. S., Christianson S. A., Hellstrom Å. (2009) ‘Justice needs a blindfold: Effects of gender and attractiveness on prison sentences and attributions of personal characteristics in a judicial process’, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16:1, S90–S100.
Antoniakis J., Dalgas O. (2009) ‘Predicting elections: Child’s play!’, Science, 323:5918, 1183.
Arzheimer K., Evans J. (2012) ‘Geolocation and voting: Candidate-voter distance effects on party choice in the 2010 UK general election in England’, Political Geography, 31:5, 301–310.
Banducci S., Karp J., Thrasher M., Rallings C. (2008) ‘Ballot photographs as cues in low-information elections’, Political Psychology, 29:6, 903–917.
Baxter G., Marcella R., Varfis E. (2011) ‘The use of the internet by political parties and candidates in Scotland during the 2010 UK general election campaign’, Aslib Proceedings, 63:5, 464–483.
Benson P. L., Karabenick S. A., Lerner R. M. (1976) ‘Pretty pleases: The effects of physical attractiveness, race, and sex on receiving help’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12:5, 409–415.
Berger J., Rosenholtz S. J., Zelditch M. Jr (1980) ‘Status organizing processes’, Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479–508.
Berggren N., Jordahl H., Poutvaara P. (2010) ‘The looks of a winner: Beauty and electoral success’, Journal of Public Economics, 94:1–2, 8–15.
Borkenau P., Brecke S., Möttig C., Paelecke M. (2009) ‘Extraversion is accurately perceived after a 50-ms exposure to a face’, Journal of Research in Personality, 43:4, 703–706.
Campbell R., Cowley P. (2014) ‘What voters want: Reactions to candidate characteristics in a survey experiment’, Political Studies, 62:4, 745–765.
Carey J. M., Shugart M. S. (1995) ‘Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas’, Electoral Studies, 14:4, 417–439.
Clarke H., Sanders D., Stewart M. C., Whiteley P. M. (2004) Political Choice in Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Clarke H., Sanders D., Stewart M. C., Whiteley P. M. (2009) Performance Politics and the British Voter (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Criddle B. (2010) ‘More diverse, yet more uniform: MPs and candidates’, in Kavanagh D., Cowley P. (eds), The British General Election of 2010 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 306–329.
Dalton R. (2008) Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies (5th edn) (Washington DC: CQ Press).
Denver D. (2003) Elections and Voters in Britain (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Desimone R., Albright T. D., Gross C. G., Bruce C. (1984) ‘Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temple neurons in the macaque’, Journal of Neuroscience, 4:8, 2051–2062.
Dion K., Berscheid E., Walster E. (1972) ‘What is beautiful is good’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24:3, 285–290.
Efron M. G., Patterson E. W. J. (1974) ‘Voters vote beautifully’, Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 6:4, 352–356.
Evans G., Tilley J. (2012) ‘The depoliticization of inequality and redistribution: Explaining the decline of class voting’, Journal of Politics, 74:4, 963–976.
Frevert T. K., Walker L. S. (2014) ‘Physical attractiveness and social status’, Sociology Compass, 8:3, 313–323.
Frieze I. H., Olson J. E., Russell J. (1991) ‘Attractiveness and income for men and women in management’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21:13, 1039–1057.
Green J., Hobolt S. B. (2008) ‘Owning the issue agenda: Explaining party strategies in British general election campaigns’, Electoral Studies, 27:3, 460–476.
Groseclose T. (2001) ‘A model of candidate location when one candidate has a valence advantage’, American Journal of Political Science, 45:4, 862–886.
Hosoda M., Stone-Romero E. F., Coats G. (2003) ‘The effects of physical attractiveness on job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies’, Personnel Psychology, 56:2, 431–462.
Johns R., Shephard M. (2007) ‘Gender, candidate image and electoral preference’, British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 9:2, 434–460.
Johns R., Shephard M. (2011) ‘Facing the voters: The potential impact of ballot paper photographs’, Political Studies, 59, 636–658.
Johnston R. J., Pattie C. (2011) ‘The British general election of 2010: A three-party contest or three two-party contests?’, The Geographical Journal, 177:1, 17–26.
Kim H., Adolphs R., O’Doherty J. P., Shimojo S. (2007) ‘Temporal isolation of neural processes underlying face preference decisions’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104:46, 18253–18258.
King A., Leigh A. (2009) ‘Beautiful politicians’, Kyklos, 62:4, 579–593.
Kulka R. A., Kessler J. B. (1978) ‘Is justice really blind?—The influence of litigant physical attractiveness on juridicial judgment’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8:4, 366–381.
Langlois J. H., Ritter J. M., Casey R. J., Sawin D. B. (1995) ‘Infant attractiveness predicts maternal behaviors and attitudes’, Developmental Psychology, 31:3, 464–472.
Lawson C., Lenz G. S., Baker A., Myers M. (2010) ‘Looking like a winner: Candidate appearance and electoral success in new democracies’, World Politics, 62:4, 561–593.
Lee Y., Matsumiya K., Wilson H. R. (2006) ‘Size-invariant but viewpoint-dependent representation of faces’, Vision Research, 46:1901–1910.
Levine G. M., Halberstadt J. B., Goldstone R. L. (1996) ‘Reasoning and the weighting of attributes in attitude judgments’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 230–240.
Lutz G. (2010) ‘The electoral success of beauties and beasts’, Swiss Political Science Review, 16, 457–480.
Mattes K., Milazzo C. (2014) ‘Pretty faces, marginal races: Predicting election outcomes using trait assessments of British parliamentary candidates’, Electoral Studies, 34, 177–189.
Milazzo C., Adams J., Green J. (2012) ‘Are voter decision rules endogenous to parties’ policy strategies? A model with applications to elite depolarization in post-Thatcher Britain’, Journal of Politics, 74:1, 262–276.
Olivola C. Y., Todorov A. (2010) ‘Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting’, Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34:2, 83–110.
Popkin S. (1994) The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns (Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press).
Ritter J. M., Casey R. J., Langlois J. H. (1991) ‘Adults’ responses to infants varying in appearance of age and attractiveness’, Child Development, 62:1, 68–82.
Ritts V., Patterson M. L., Tubbs M. E. (1992) ‘Expectations, impressions, and judgments of physically attractive students: A review’, Review of Educational Research, 62:4, 413–426.
Rosar U., Klein M., Beckers T. (2008) ‘The frog pond beauty contest: Physical attractiveness and electoral success of the constituency candidates at the north Rhine-Westphalia state election of 2005’, European Journal of Political Research, 47:1, 64–79.
Rule N. O., Ambady N., Adams R. B. Jr (2010) ‘Polling the face: Prediction and consensus across cultures’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98:1, 1–15.
Rule N. O., Ambady N., Adams R. B. Jr, Macrae C. N. (2008) ‘Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1019–1028.
Sárlvik B., Crewe I. (1983) Decade of Dealignment: The Conservative Victory of 1979 and Electoral Trends in the 1970s (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Shugart M. S., Valdini M. E., Suominen K. (2005) ‘Looking for locals: Voter information demands and personal vote-earning attributes of legislators under proportional representation’, American Journal of Political Science, 29:2, 437–449.
Sigelman L., Sigleman C. K., Fowler C. (1987) ‘A bird of a different feather? An experimental investigation of physical attractiveness and the electability of female candidates’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 50:1, 32–43.
Stewart J. E. II (1980) ‘Defendant’s attractiveness as a factor in the outcome of criminal trials: An observational study’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10:4, 348–361.
Stokes D. E. (1963) ‘Spatial models of party competition’, American Political Science Review, 57:2, 368–377.
Stokes D. E. (1992) ‘Valence politics’, in Kavanaugh D. (ed.), Electoral Politics (New York: Oxford University Press), 141–164.
Straube T., Langhor B., Schmidt S., Mentzel H-J., Miltner W. H. R. (2009) ‘Increased amygdala activation to averted versus direct gaze in humans is independent of valence of facial expression’, Neuroimage, 49:3, 2680–2686.
Sussman A. B., Petkova K., Todorov A. (2013) ‘Competence ratings in US predict presidential election outcomes in Bulgaria’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49:4, 771–775.
Todorov A., Mandisodza A. N., Goren A., Hall C. C. (2005) ‘Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes’, Science, 308, 1623–1626.
Willis J., Todorov A. (2006) ‘First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face’, Psychological Science, 17:7, 592–598.
Wring D., Ward S. (2010) ‘The media and the 2010 campaign: The television election?’, Parliamentary Affairs, 63:4, 802–817.
Biographies
Caitlin Milazzo, Department of Politics and International Relations, University Park, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK, email: [email protected]
Kyle Mattes, Department of Politics and International Relations, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th St., Miami, FL 33199, USA, email: [email protected].
Cite
Cite
Cite
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: June 1, 2015
Issue published: February 2016
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in The British Journal of Politics and International Relations.
View All Journal MetricsPublication usage*
Total views and downloads: 1433
*Publication usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Publications citing this one
Receive email alerts when this publication is cited
Web of Science: 24 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 27
- Campaign Personalisation at the 2023 Estonian Parliamentary Election
- Kandidierenden-Attraktivität und Wahlerfolg – Eine Untersuchung zu parteispezifischen Unterschieden in der Wirksamkeit der physischen Attraktivität von Direktkandidierenden bei den Bundestagswahlen 2005 bis 2021
- Voice attractiveness affects cooperative behavior in the Stag Hunt Game: evidence from neural electrophysiology
- Are some parties immune from scandal? Party family, scandal exposure, and party evaluation
- Facial attractiveness influenced cooperative behavior in the Stag Hunt game: Evidence from neural electrophysiology
- Is there a prototype leader look? Evidence from the photos of Chinese local leaders
- Thread Lifting Techniques for Facial Rejuvenation and Recontouring
- Facial first impressions following a prison sentence: Negative shift in trait ratings but the same underlying structure
- Soziale Wirkung physischer Attraktivität
- Makeup increases attractiveness in male faces
- View More
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
PSA Member Access
Political Studies Association members have access to this journal as part of their membership. Sign in here using your membership username and password.
PSA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
