Cryonics: Science or Religion
- PMID: 33523374
- DOI: 10.1007/s10943-020-01166-6
Cryonics: Science or Religion
Abstract
Cryonics involves the low-temperature freezing of human corpses in the hope that they will one day be reanimated. Its advocates see it as a medical treatment but as in any medical procedure, this presupposes some scientific evidence. This paper examines the scientific basis of this technology and argues that cryonics is based upon assertions which have never been (and potentially can never be empirically demonstrated) scientifically. After providing a general overview of cryogenic preservation, I discuss how advocates of this technology have conceptualized death and more specifically their notion of information-theoretic death. I conclude that cryonics is based upon a naive faith rather than upon science. It does what David Chidester (2005) calls 'religious work,' even if it is not explicitly religious. It offers transcendence over death.
Keywords: Cryonics; Death; Religion; Science.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Abraham, W. C., & Robins, A. (2005). Memory retention—The synaptic stability versus plasticity dilemma. Trends in Neurosciences, 28(2), 73–78. - DOI
-
- Alcor n.d. (2017). Frequently asked questions: Is there a moral argument for cryonics.
-
- Arshavsky, Y. I. (2006). “The seven sins” of the Hebbian synapse: Can the hypothesis of synaptic plasticity explain long-term memory consolidation? Progress in Neurobiology, 80(3), 99–113. - DOI
-
- Becker, E. (1973). The Denial of death. New York: Free Press.
-
- Bernat, J. L., Culver, C. M., & Gert, C. B. (1981). On the definition and criteria of death. Annals of Internal Medicine, 11, 389–394. - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources