A More General Diffusion of Knowledge
A website and blog dedicated to the expansion of history education.
Thursday, December 31, 2015
Tilting at Windmills, Vol. 1, No. 20
I would like to take this time to wish everyone a Happy New Year! Please be responsible this evening and enjoy 2016. I am looking forward to a very interesting year and hope to pick up some of the things I have had to put on the back burner due to time requirements. Don't worry, I plan to continue my Art of Teaching History section, but with everything going on had to postpone the development of that thread until I could get caught up with thing. Hopefully that will be moving forward soon!
See you in the new year!
Tuesday, December 29, 2015
The Mad Historian's Athenaeum, Vol. 1, No. 26
Nash, Gary B., Charlotte
Crabtree, and Ross E. Dunn. History on
Trial: Culture Wars and the Teaching of the Past. New York: Alfred A.
Knopf, 1997. xiv + 320 ppg.



This book
does a wonderful job in exposing the hypocrisy of the entire assault by Cheney
and her clique including conservative media who were desperate for anything to
present to their audiences in order to generate ratings. The talking points of
those assaults are examined and easily rebutted in the book. Most of the time,
it is painfully obvious that the people slamming the standards had not read
them and were instead relying on someone else’s opinions.
Unfortunately,
the same people are bringing up the same issues today. That makes this book
particularly relevant. The arguments are the same, but this time involves
Common Core or the new AP History course. Reading this book can help
intelligent people rebut the distortions generated by those who wish to
perpetuate the myth of American Exceptionalism. It is worth noting that all of
the academic historical organizations in the US reject the conservative talking
points. Why is it that people with degrees in history and careers spanning
decades involving meticulous research into the many aspects of American History
are derided and ridiculed by a group of people who often lack a college degree,
or of the few that do have one, none of them are in history?
That alone should indicate what is
really going on in this discussion. Also, note how many of the detractors are
either politicians or media figures that use the discussions to generate
ratings. Once you examine the standards and the issues, it is painfully obvious
that Nash, Crabtree, and Dunn are correct and that this book exposes the
conservative attacks as nothing more than political rhetoric. With that in mind
this book gets four stars. I reserve five stars for truly great books and four
for very good books.
Thursday, December 24, 2015
According to Jim, Vol. 1, No. 20

Another famous Christmas season when our troops were at war took place in 1944 during the Battle of the Bulge, an event my grandfather took place in as an infantryman in Co. K, 405th INF Regiment, 102nd "Ozark" Infantry Division. The division occupied the lines as other units, mainly armor, were shifted south for the main battle. During the Christmas holiday they were engaged in daily combat with the Wehrmacht units on the lines as the Germans were trying to pin down as many Allied troops as they could to keep them away from the main battle. The 102nd spoiled their goal by spreading out along the line and holding what had been held by four divisions.
There have been other wars, conflicts, and "military actions" which have kept our military service members in harm's way since the founding of this nation. Even during peace, our service members are away from home. So please take time this holiday season to say thanks to them and offer a prayer for their safety while also remembering those who have served somewhere on Christmas Day since 1775.

While we're at it, remember those who will be on duty serving us as police officers, fire fighters, ambulance crews, hospital employees of all kinds, and all the men and women who will be on duty in some capacity this holiday. Keep them in your thoughts and prayers as well.
Have a Merry Christmas and God Bless!

Tuesday, December 22, 2015
The Mad Historian's Athenaeum, Vol 1, No. 25
Martin, George R.R. A
Dance with Dragons. New York: Bantam Books, 2011. 1126 ppg.

In any
event, you have to admit Martin can spin a tale. I have to admit I’m hooked.
There is something about the epic struggle between the factions of the realm in
Westeros, the Stark family’s survivors, and the struggle for the hand of a
queen in Esteros that compels me to keep reading. The pages are filled with
violence, but character development is unparalleled in Martin’s books. These
are not simple one dimensional characters created to fill roles, but people who
change their minds and even their beliefs over time. Some are locked into their
beliefs such as those who oppose Jon Snow and murder him while others are
willing to open themselves to new ideas. In any event, the people are what
drive the action of these books and I like many of you will read all the way to
the last page of the series to find out what happens to them.


All in all,
the book is a good read, but I just dislike the long release periods between
them. I think that has the potential to lose fans and since it is very likely
the HBO show will end before the seventh and alleged last volume of the book
series, Martin may find himself loosing readers who lose interest between books
now that they find the answers they want on screen. Again, that is entirely
Martin’s choice. Other than that, I still recommend the series. It is well
written and character driven. It is definitely not for children and should not
be considered Young Adult by any stretch of the imagination. It is realistic
high fantasy with the gutters and dregs of society brought into the light. Some
say it is too real, but let’s face it, the medieval era was no era of chivalry.

Saturday, December 19, 2015
History...Yesterday in the Present, No. 13
How Thomas Paine’s other pamphlet saved the Revolution
by NCC Staff
Original article appeared on the National Constitution Center's blog page 12-19-2015.

Four days later, like a modern day football coach seeking to inspire his team, General George Washington had Paine’s words read out loud to his troops at McKonkey’s Ferry on the Delaware River. Paine had written the words during the army’s retreat from New York.
The army’s commanders read the words to a force that include John Marshall, Alexander Hamilton, James Monroe and Aaron Burr.
Washington was literally at a crossroads. His opponent, General Howe, had offered pardons to local residents, and the re-enlistment period was ending for the volunteers in his army.

The much-needed victory galvanized the Revolutionary forces and the Continental Congress. Troops decided to enlist again as Washington’s forces won a second battle at Trenton and a key engagement at Princeton.
While American Crisis did much to inspire the troops, its fame was nowhere near that of Common Sense, which was the first viral mass communications event in America
The first version of Common Sense went viral, in the current sense of the word, when it hit the cobblestone streets here on January 9, 1776.

So about 20 percent of colonists owned a copy of the revolutionary booklet. In current-day sales, that would amount to sales of 60 million, not including overseas sales.
Link: Read Common Sense
In the case of Common Sense, the publicity was literally word of mouth, since people would buy the pamphlet and shout the words on street corners and inside taverns for the illiterate to hear.
Paine was born and raised in England, and he had been in Philadelphia for little more than a year, after getting a letter of recommendation from Benjamin Franklin.
He published Common Sense anonymously, and its simple words made the case for the Colonies’ separation from England, in no uncertain terms.
In his later years, Paine would become a controversial figure because of his writings on religion and his role in the French revolution; only a handful of people attended his funeral in 1809.
President Thomas Jefferson had permitted Paine to return from France in his final years, and wrote about the author in 1821.
“No writer has exceeded Paine in ease and familiarity of style, in perspicuity of expression, happiness of elucidation, and in simple and unassuming language,” Jefferson said. “ In this he may be compared with Dr. Franklin; and indeed his Common Sense was, for awhile, believed to have been written by Dr. Franklin, and published under the borrowed name of Paine, who had come over with him from England.”
Thursday, December 17, 2015
History...Yesterday in the Present
New Orleans votes to remove Confederate, Civil War monuments
By Ben Brumfield and Ralph Ellis, CNN
Updated 6:13 PM ET, Thu December 17, 2015
Original story appeared on CNN. |

NOLA mayor wants to replace Robert E. Lee statue 03:25
Story highlights
- The city's mayor says the vote was "a courageous decision"
- New Orleans City Council votes 6-1 to remove three statues and one obelisk
- A majority of council members introduced the proposal at the mayor's request
(CNN)A
large crowd broke into cheers Thursday after the New Orleans City
Council voted to remove four monuments to the Confederacy from prominent
places in the city.
The 6-1 vote
means officials will take down statues of Gens. Robert E. Lee, P.G.T.
Beauregard and Jefferson Davis, President of the Confederacy. An obelisk
dedicated to the Battle of Liberty Place will also go.
It's
one of the strongest gestures yet by an American city to remove symbols
of Confederate history, following a trend in many Southern states to
take down the Confederate battle flag.
Historic
societies in the 300-year-old city supported the removal of the
monuments, and the proposal was introduced by a majority of City Council
members.

New Orleans' mayor wants Confederate monuments removed 02:21
Mayor
Mitch Landrieu described the move as a "courageous decision to turn a
page on our divisive past and chart the course for a more inclusive
future."
Council
member Nadine Ramsey said New Orleans needed to stop living "underneath
the shadows" of monuments to people who supported slavery.
"We
need not honor these individuals and moments from the past that do not
meet our standards of decency, equality and nondiscrimination," she
said.
Council member Stacy Head cast
the only vote against taking down the monuments, saying the action would
create more division and not solve the city's real problems.
"It
will not improve the socioeconomic balance of the city," she said. "If
it would make the city more color blind, if it would create more
balance, I would sacrifice almost any physical object to get us to that
point."
Charleston slayings were a tipping point

17 photos: Charleston church shooting






























Landrieu said the church slayings in Charleston, South Carolina, moved him to take action.
He'd been thinking about having the symbols of the Confederacy removed for about a year, when a white gunman in South Carolina massacred black worshippers at Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal on June 17. Dylann Roof, the shooter, venerated the Confederate battle flag. And soon after the shooting, calls to remove it from that state's Capitol grounds intensified.
A week later, Landrieu announced the planned ordinance.
He addressed the City Council on Thursday, saying that New Orleans has many monuments, but he wanted these four removed because they are the most important.
"This is the right thing to do at the right time," Landrieu said.
"As
we approach the Tricentennial, New Orleanians have the power and the
right to correct historical wrongs and move the City forward. The ties
that bind us together as a city are stronger than what keeps us apart,"
he said, according to a City Hall news release.
Monuments called 'nuisances'
The
ordinance approved by the council declares the Confederate monuments
"nuisances" and called for them to be removed. The statues are
unconstitutional, said the proposed ordinance marked Calendar No. 31,082.
"They
honor, praise, or foster ideologies which are in conflict with the
requirements of equal protection for citizens as provided by the
constitution and laws of the United States, the state, or the laws of
the city and suggests the supremacy of one ethnic, religious, or racial
group over another."
Monument supporters say it's not about race
In July, the city called for 60 days of public meetings to review the proposed ordinance.
Landrieu requested the vote to banish specters of racism. But opponents of the plan steered away from any racial argument.
Keeping
the figures of the Confederacy was not about preserving racial
injustice, they said, but about honoring figures who fought to protect
the city.
New Orleans, which was the
largest city in the Confederacy, fell to Union forces in 1862 and was
under federal occupation beyond the Civil War's end in 1865.
No place for Lee
One
prominent artist who wanted the figures gone also skirted the issue of
race. Jazz musician Wynton Marsalis, who is African-American, said that
Lee in particular had no historic place in the city.
"This
symbolic place in our city should represent a great New Orleanian, or
it should be an open space that represents our latest prevail and how
people helped us, not a person who had nothing to do with our city and
who indeed fought against the United States of America and lost," Marsalis told CNN affiliate WDSU.
Gen.
P.G.T. Beauregard was a Louisiana native, and Confederate President
Jefferson Davis lived in New Orleans after the war and died there.
Statue has stood since 1884
Lee's statue stands 60 feet high atop a neoclassical column at what was christened Lee Circle in his honor. It was originally called Tivoli Circle. Most Mardi Gras parades snake right past it.
Lee faces north, looking in the direction of his former enemy, and has stood there since 1884, the history department at the University of New Orleans says. Both Davis and Beauregard attended the monument's dedication.
Their statues were erected in the 1910s.
A fourth monument, probably the most contentious, will also be taken down.

6 photos: Evolution of the Confederate flag









The
monument to the Battle of Liberty Place commemorates an uprising in
1874 of the White League against federal forces and police in an attempt
to overthrow racially integrated governance put in place during
Reconstruction.
Former mayors, including Landrieu's father, Moon Landrieu, have attempted to have this monument removed or altered.
When
asked what would happen to the removed monuments, Landrieu suggested a
park that would reflect the complete history of the city, from before
the American Revolution to the present. That park, he said, would be a
place where "history can be remembered and not revered."
He said city leaders should consider forming a commission to decide what to do about other monuments.
Council
President Jason Williams said, "After a long and thoughtful debate on
this issue, I am pleased that we have reached a conclusion. Thank you to
all citizens who have participated and made your voices heard during
this process. We all may have differing perspectives, but share a common
love and concern for the City of New Orleans."
CNN's Catherine E. Shoichet, Andreas Preuss and Joe Sutton contributed to this report.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)