Jump to content

User talk:Moonriddengirl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are here with questions about an article I have deleted or a copyright concern, please consider first reading my personal policies with regards to deletion and copyright, as these may provide your answer.

While you can email me to reach me in my volunteer capacity, I don't recommend it. I very seldom check that email account. If you do email me, please leave a note here telling me so or I may never see it. I hardly ever check that account.

To leave a message for me, press the "new section" or "+" tab at the top of the page, or simply click here. Remember to sign your message with ~~~~. I will respond to all civil messages.

I attempt to keep conversations in one location, as I find it easier to follow them that way when they are archived. If you open a new conversation here, I will respond to you here. Please watchlist this page or check back for my reply; I will leave you a "talkback" notice if you request one and will generally try to trigger your automatic notification even if you don't. (I sometimes fail to be consistent there; please excuse me if I overlook it.) If I have already left a message at your talk page, unless I've requested follow-up here or it is a standard template message, I am watching it, but I would nevertheless appreciate it you could trigger my automatic notification. {{Ping}} works well for that. If you leave your reply here, I may respond at your talk page if it seems better for context. If you aren't sure if I'm watching your page, feel free to approach me here.


Reaching me

During my current work interim position, I have found myself with not a lot of spare time that isn't consumed by family. I can go long periods without logging in to Wikipedia. If you have an urgent note for me here, please consider alerting me via email at mdennis@wikimedia.org. (This is my work email address, and I do not mix work and volunteering, but mailing that address makes sure I will see it promptly, usually within a day.) If not urgent, I'll come by as soon as I can, and I heartily welcome talk page stalkers. :) Oh, I have discovered that sometimes when people don't tell me it's a volunteer contact, I have handled it with the wrong hat on. Please make which "me" you want clear!


Long time no see!

[edit]

Hi. A former helper of copyright clean-up here who last interacted with you a long time ago! I know you haven't been as active as you used to be, but thought I'd let you know that we have a new candidate for adminship that's keen to help out in CCI. If ever you'd like to take an interest in Copyright cleanup again, I'm sure she'd be happy to collaborate with you. If not, that's OK, just saying hello to you. Am (Ring!) (Notes) 09:40, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lol 2601:245:CE00:7FE0:D9FB:94A8:4AED:F539 (talk) 23:04, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ponnar Shankar for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ponnar Shankar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ponnar Shankar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GoldRomean (talk) 17:41, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thefirstsongs.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thefirstsongs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrative permissions and inactivity reminder

[edit]

Information iconThis is a reminder that established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. You are receiving this annual reminder since you have averaged less than 50 edits per year over the last 5 years.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to reengage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to be engaged with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:18, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Acea page and conflicts

[edit]

Hello,

I've been dealing with issues regarding a page I created in December 2008. I don’t have anything further to say about the page itself. However, today I was made aware that I am not listed as the creator and that the page has been newly attributed to another user—you. When I check the page history, it shows that you created it back in 2008, which is not true.

I wasn’t aware that editors could take over authorship of pages regardless of prior contributions. I find this utterly abusive and misleading, exercising control over information that may underrepresent my identity to the world. If it was my mistake, whether through ignorance or careless behavior, I don’t believe that you—or Wikipedia, for that matter—should be able to retain the page, as it was never your intention to create or maintain it.

I have repeatedly requested that the page be deleted. I do not wish to appear on this platform anymore, and I don’t believe that, given you didn’t create it in the first place, you now have the right—after all the discussion—to keep it and edit it at your discretion, especially when my notability is demonstrated in the same reference section that has been kept.

However, all references to my work have been removed—not edited or fixed, but completely removed—which is a major contradiction. I am now formally requesting, as I have before, that the page be deleted due to the lack of notability of the subject (myself) and the underrepresentation of my work. Please advise.

Thank you. Francisacea (talk) 17:39, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Again, Francisacea, this is not how Wikipedia works. The original creator of an article does not exercise any special control or any right of authorship over the article; they are just one among the many editors of Wikipedia. This goes for both you as the original creator of the now-deleted page and for MRG here as the re-creator of the page after it was deleted. Neither MRG, nor you, nor any other editor on Wikipedia has an exclusive "right to keep and edit it"--and on the other side of the coin, you also do not have an exclusive right to require its deletion. Deletion discussions, as with all other discussions on Wikipedia, will be decided by consensus of the community, not the say-so of any one editor in either direction. There is nothing abusive or misleading going on here; this is how Wikipedia has always worked. Writ Keeper  17:53, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your reply. I have nothing further to discuss. Let’s put it this way: consider me the worst person ever—someone who used the platform to self-promote, violate copyright guidelines, misrepresent their own notability, and capitalize on the platform. Furthermore, label me as a far-right anti-communist, anti-socialist, opposed to every aspect of liberalism and progressivism—the worst person you could imagine, undeserving of participation in the beautiful community of enlightened editors—and just delete the page, as I do not wish to remain on the platform for the reasons I have previously expressed. Thank you. Francisacea (talk) 18:13, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]