Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
FAQs
Figures
References
All Topics
Theology
Religion

The Scythian ‘Rule Over Asia’: the Classical Tradition and the Historical Reality, in Ancient Greeks West and East. Ed. by G.R. Tsetskhladze. Leiden (E.J. Brill), 1999, 497-520.

Profile image of Askold IvantchikAskold Ivantchik

1999, MNEMOSYNE-LEIDEN-SUPPLEMENTUM-

https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004351257_021
visibility

…

description

25 pages

link

1 file

Abstract
sparkles

AI

The paper explores the narrative of the Scythian 'rule over Asia' through classical traditions and historical realities. It examines various accounts, particularly those by Pompeius Tragus and Herodotus, to differentiate between legends and historical interpretations. The study argues that many elements of these narratives stem from Greek literary traditions rather than authentic Scythian history, emphasizing the complexities and the often mythical context surrounding the Scythians and the Amazons.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What historical events underlie the Scythian domination narrative in Asia?add

The study reveals that the 'Scythian domination' corresponds to raids in Asia around 626-616 B.C., involving significant engagements with local populations, including the plunder of cities like Ashkelon.

How do classical sources depict the duration of Scythian rule?add

Herodotus indicates a 28-year rule over Asia, while Pompeius Tragus claims only eight years, reflecting differing narrative traditions and possibly Scythian folklore.

What roles do figures like Madyes play in Scythian historical accounts?add

Madyes, son of Protothyes, emerges as a key leader linked to the raids, with his historical presence corroborated by Assyrian texts from around 672 B.C.

What was the scholarly debate regarding the reliability of Herodotus on Scythians?add

The study highlights that while some scholars challenge Herodotus' reliability, others assert that his accounts, particularly about Scythian names and customs, closely reflect Scythian traditions.

How does Scythian folklore influence classical narratives of domination?add

Evidence suggests Scythian folklore significantly exaggerates the importance of raids, merging local traditions with Greek interpretations of Scythian incursions to construct a more extensive narrative.

Figures (1)

Related papers

Ephesus and the Amazons Remembering or Recreating the Early History of a Greek Polis in the 5th Century BC
Helene Blinkenberg Hastrup

This essay examines the "Amazon monument of Ephesus", because the “meaning” of prominent freestanding Greek monuments was often more explicit than the “meaning” of architectural sculpture. If we want to understand the ancient cityscapes we need to take these monuments into account and rekindle the interest in Roman copies of Greek monuments; not so much as evidence of Greek sculptural style but of the Greek visual landscape. This paper is published in its final version in: Cityscapes and Monuments of Western Asia Minor, Memories and Identities. Eds. Eva Mortensen and Birte Poulsen.

View PDFchevron_right
Amazons in pre-Roman Italy, symbols of a new era
Sarah Willemsen

Deliciae Fictiles IV, 2011

View PDFchevron_right
The Scythians and Urartu
Sergey Makhortykh

Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East Volume 1, 2023

The article is devoted to a comparative analysis of Scythian antiquities of the 7th-6th centuries BC, which were found in two of the best-studied Urartian fortresses. One of them (Ayanis) is located near the eastern shore of Lake Van (Turkey), and the other (Karmir-Blur) on a hilltop in the outskirts of Yerevan (Armenia).

View PDFchevron_right
The Scythians and Their Neighbors
Anatoly Khazanov

Nomads as Agents of Cultural Change: The Mongols and Their Eurasian Predecessors, 2015

ncient authors and some contemporary scholars have used the name "Scythians" in two different meanings: a generic name for the an-"" cient nomads of the Eurasian steppes, semideserts and deserts, especially the Iranian-speaking ones; and for a particular ethnic group or several groups that, in the first millennium BCE, inhabited the East European steppes, which stretch from the lower Danube to the lower Don Rivers for roughly 620 miles, and from the area to the north from the Black Sea to the forest-steppe zone for over 310 miles. Although this chapter is devoted to the latter, there will also be a few cases where they will be discussed in the broader context of the ancient nomads.

View PDFchevron_right
Scythian Origins, FS de Bouvrie.pdf
Bruce Lincoln
View PDFchevron_right
The Inverted World of the Amazons: Aspects of a Persistent Myth in Early Modern Greek Literature
Tassos A. Kaplanis

2011

The myth of the Amazons has been one of the most potent and popular of all Greek myths from its inception to the present day. In the first part of this paper, a presentation of its basic elements is attempted. This presentation takes into account the transformations of both the myth and the means by which it is presented (from ancient Greek narratives and depictions to present day comics and graphic novels), as comprehensively as possible. The second part focuses on major Amazon appearances in early modern Greek literature and provides an analysis, much indebted to feminist criticism and Bakhtin, of the inverted world of the Amazons in the Chapbook of Alexander (late 17th century), which constitutes its central theme. Additionally, it briefly examines the duel of the last epic hero of Greek literature, digenis Akritis with the Amazon maximou, as presented in the 15th-century escorial version of the text.

View PDFchevron_right
Amazons in the Family of Alexander the Great
David D G Grant

Ancient Origins, 2020

Written for Ancient Origins, Spring 2020, and extracted from my 2019 book titled Unearthing the Family of Alexander the Great; the Remarkable Discovery of the Royal Tombs of Macedon

View PDFchevron_right
Relations Between Scythians and Greeks in Black See Area
Andrea Namerova
View PDFchevron_right
The Three Scythian Brothers: an Extract from the Chronicle of Michael the Great
Mark Dickens

Parole de l'Orient, Vol. 35 , 2010

View PDFchevron_right
The memory of Amazon myths in Roman epigraphy, 1st-7th centuries AD
Arturo Sanchez Sanz

2017

The frequent methodological approach to representations of (homo)sexuality in classical literature since Dover and Foucault is the so-called 'penetration model'. For Dover, erotic relationships in classical Athens revolved around the existence of a power differential between the penetrative 'lover' and the penetrated 'object of desire' reflecting existing hierarchies in classical Greek society. 2 Some scholars, however, have reasonably objected that Dover's model mostly relies on the evidence for classical Athens, and that other contexts, periods, or environments might not as easily reflect this model. 3 Theocritus' homoerotic poems, for instance, seemingly 'take for granted' the absence of a power differential and present a new type of homoeroticism that diverges from pederasty. 4 In what follows, I evaluate this 'developmentalist' possibility, asking how well these poems capture dynamics of mutuality and reciprocity, and whether the relationship between ἐρώμενος and ἐραστής has adopted a different 'ethos' from archaic and classical times. I will argue that Theocritean poetry is not unique in representing the older man's sexual desire, his conceptualisation of the relationship in terms of equality and mutuality, and in emphasising the older man's erotic dependence on the boy. While Theocritus constantly subverts the hierarchy inherent in the pederastic relationship, this procedure of reversal is not uniquely 'Hellenistic'. Hence, these features cannot be taken as evidence to argue that Theocritus is deconstructing or ridiculing pederasty. For reasons of space, I will focus in my analysis on Idylls 13, 29, 12, 30 (in this order). Examining Idyll 13 and the portrayal of the relationship between Heracles and Hylas, I will argue that a disbalance in the power dynamics of pederasty is conceptually fundamental to grasp the irony of the poem. The reversal of the hierarchy, I argue, is a literary phenomenon that does not correspond to any level of flexibility or diachronic development in the erotic relationship in the extraliterary world; rather, it illuminates the persistence of the traditional hierarchy in the reality existing outside literature. By looking at Idyll 29, I will also consider other elements that potentially differ from archaic and classical representations of pederasty in Greek literature, and will argue that the similarities between them make it difficult, if not impossible, to sustain a developmentalist thesis. One important element which is shared by the previous and the later homoerotic poetic tradition is indeed what I call the 'poetics of reversal': the brief analysis of Idyll 12 and 30 shows that

View PDFchevron_right

References (67)

  1. Abaev, V.L 1979: Scytho-Sarmatian Dialects. In Abaev, VJ., Bogolyubov, M.N. and Rastorgueva, V.S. (eds.) The Bases if tlze Iranian linguistic. 17ze Ancient Iranwn Languages (Moscow), 272-364 (in Russian).
  2. Avi-Yonah, M. 1962: Scythopolis. Israel Exploration Journal 12, 123-134.
  3. --1976: Gazetteer if Roman Palestine Qerusalem).
  4. Avigad, N. 1986: Hebrew Bullae .from tlze Time if Jeremiah: Remnants if a Burnt Archive Qerusalem).
  5. Beer, R. 1921: Scythopolis. In RE. Vol. 11 A, 1, 947-948.
  6. Blok, JH. 1995: 17ze Early Amazons. Modem and Ancient Perspectives on a Persistent Myth. (Leiden, New York, Koln).
  7. Boer, W., den 1967: Herodot und die Systeme der Chronologie. A1nemosyne 20, 30-60.
  8. Bremmer,JN. 1987: Ramulus, Remus and the Foundation of Rome. In Bremmer, JN. and Horsfall, N.M., Roman Myth and Mytlzography. (London).
  9. Brown, S.T. 1988: The Medikos Logos of Herodotus and the Evolution of the Median State. In Kuhrt, A. and Sancisi-Weerdenburg, H. (eds.) Achaemenid History. Ill. Method and Theory (Leiden),}l-87.
  10. Bum, A.R. 1949: Early Greek Qhi•onology. JHS 69, 70-73.
  11. Chochiev, A.R. 1985: Studies in the_Sbcio.l History iftlze Ossetians (Tskhinvali) (in Russian).
  12. Condamin, P. 1936: .U livre de Jeremie (Paris).
  13. Crarner, C.F. 1777: Slfytlzische Denkmiiltr in Paliistirul (Hamburg).
  14. Drews, R. 1967: The Fall of Astyages and Herodotus' Chronology of the Eastern Kingdom. Historia 18, 1-11.
  15. --1973: 17ze Greek Accounts of Eastern History {Washington).-- Fmegan, J. 1964: Handbook if Biblical Chronology (Princeton).
  16. Frey, J.B. 1952: Corpus Inscriptionum Iui:laicanun. Vol. IT (Rome).
  17. Gadd, CJ. 1923: 17ze Fall if N'uuveh. 17ze newly discovered Bahylonian Chronicle .Nr. 21.901 in tlze British Museum (Oxford).
  18. Grantovskii, E.A. 1960: Indo-Iranian Casts by the Sgtlzians. The XXVtlz Intematinnal Ori.entalistic Congress. The Papers of the Delegation if the USSR. (Moscow) (in Russian).
  19. --1980: Problems of the Study of the Scythian Social Structures. VD! 4, 128-155 (in Russian).
  20. Grayson, A.K. .1975: As~ and Bai!Jionion Chronicles (LocustValley).
  21. Gutschmid, A., von 1894: Die beiden ersten Biicher des Pompejus Tragus. In Kleine _ &hrijlen. Vol. V. (Leipzig).
  22. Halpem, B. 1987: "Brisker Pipes than Poetry": the Development of Israelite Mono- theism. In Neusner, J., Levine, B.A. and Frerichs, F.S. (eds.) Jtulaic Perspectius if Ancient Israel (Philadelphia), 77-115.
  23. --1993: The Baal {and the Asherah) in Seventh-Century Judah: Yhwh's Retainers Retired. In Barthelmus, R., Kriiger, T. and Utzschneider, H. (eds.) Konsequmte Traditionsgeschichte. Festschrifl.for Klaus Balt;:er ;:urn 65. Geburtstag. (Fribourg Suisse, Gottingen), 115-154.
  24. Hartog, F. 1988: 77ze Mirror if Herodotus: 77ze Representation if the Other in the Writing if History (Berkeley).
  25. Huxley, G.L. 1960: Homer's Amazons. La Parola del Passato 15, 122-124.
  26. Hyatt, JP. 1940: The Peril from the North in Jeremiah. Journal if Biblical literature 59, 499_:513.
  27. lvanchik, A.l. and Kullanda, S.V. 1991: Methods of the Source Study on the History of Peoples without Written Linguage and Early Stages of the Sociogenesis. In Korotaev, A. (ed.) 77ze Archaic Society: Main Problems if the Sociology if Development. Vol. I, 192-216 (in Russian).
  28. Ivantchik, A.I. 1993: Les Cimmeriens au Proche-Orient (Fribourg Suisse, Gottingen).
  29. --forthcoming: Eine griechische Pseudo-Historie. Der Pharao Sesostris und der skytho-agyptische Krieg. Historia.
  30. Jacoby, F. 1902: Apollodors Chronik (Berlin).
  31. James, F. 1966: 77ze Iron Age at Beth Shan. A Study if Levels VI-IV (Philadelphia).
  32. James, F., Kempinski, A., Tzori, N. and Bahat, D. 1975: Beth-Shean. In Avi-Yonah, M. (ed.), Enryclopedia if Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land. Vol. I (London), 207-229.
  33. Kaletsch, H. 1958: Zur Iydische Chronologie. Historia 7, l-47.
  34. Malamat, A. 1950-1951: The Historical Setting of Two Biblical Prophecies on the Nations. Israel Exploration Journal !, 149-159.
  35. Mayrhofer, M. 1973: Onomastica Persopolitana (Vienna).
  36. Mazar, A. 1993: Beth-Shean. In Stern, E. (ed.) 77ze .New Enryclopedia if Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land. Vol. I (New York, London et al.), 214-223.
  37. Millard, A.R. 1979: The Scythian Problem. In Ruffle,].
  38. Gaballa, G.A. and Kitchen, K.A. (eds.), Glimpses if Ancient E@pt. Studies in Honour if H. W Fairmann (Warminster), 119-123.
  39. Miller, M. 1965: Herodotus as Chronographer. Klio 46, 109-128.
  40. Miller, V.F. 1887: Ossetic Studies. Ill (Moscow) (in Russian).
  41. Mitchel, F. 1956: Herodotus' Use. of Genealogical Chronology. Phoenix 10, 49-69.
  42. Mosshammer, A.A. 1979: The Gnronicles if Eusebius and Greek Chronographic Tradition (Lewisburg, London).
  43. Miillenhoff, K. 1892: Deutsche Alteftumskunde. Vol. Ill (Berlin).
  44. Na'aman, N. 1991: The Kingdom of Judah under Josiah. Tel Aviv 18, 3-71. Narts 1989: 77ze .Narts. Ossetic Heroic Epics. (Moscow) (in Russian and Ossetian).
  45. Oates, J. 1991: The Fall of Assyria. In CAH 2nd ed. Vol. III,2. (Cambridge), 162-194.
  46. Parker, V. 1993: Zur griechischen und vorderasiatischen Chronologie des sechsten Jahrhunderts v. Chr. unter besonderer Beriicksichtigung der Kypselidenchronologie. Historia 42, 385-417.
  47. Piotrowicz, L. 1929: L'invasion des Scythes en Asie Anterieure au VIle siecle av. J.C. &s 32, 473-508.
  48. Prakken, D. 1943: Studies in Greek Genealogical Chronology (Lancaster).
  49. Pritchett, W.K. 1993: 77ze Liar &hoot if Herodotos (Amsterdam).
  50. Rowe, A. 1930: 77ze Topography and History if &th-Shan (Philadelphia).
  51. Rowley, H.H. 1962-1963: The Early Prophecies ofjeremiah in their Setting. Bulletin if the John Rylands lihrary 45, 199-234.
  52. Shanks, H. 1987: Jeremiah's Scribe and Confidant Speaks from a Hoard of Clay Bullae. Biblical Arclweology Review 13, 58-65.
  53. --1996: Fmgerprint of Jeremia's Scribe. Biblical Archaeology Review 22, ,36-37.
  54. Shkorpil, •V;V. 1904: The Rapport about the Arc~~::Qlogiql.). Excavations in th.e City of Kerch and in its Region in 1902. IAK 9, 73-177 (in Russian).
  55. Strasburger, H. 1956: Herodots Zeitrechnung. Historia 5, 129-161.
  56. Sulimirski, T. and Tay1ot;T.-1991: The-Scythiahs.--In CAJ-i '2nd ed. VoL -III,2 (Cambridge), 547-591.
  57. _ Tadmor, H. 1978: Die Zeit des Ersten Tempe1s, die babylonische Gefangenschaft und die Restauration. In Ben-Sasson, H.H. (ed.) Geschichte des jiidischen Volkes. Vol. I (Munich), 115-231. , Thureau-Dangin, F. 1925: La fin de !'Empire assyrien. Revue d'assyriowgiR et d'archiow- gie orientak 22, 27-29.
  58. Tokhtasev, S. 1996: Die Kimmerier in der antiken Oberlieferung. Hyperboreus 2, 3-46.
  59. V asmer, M. I 923: Untersuchungen iiber die iiltesten Wohnsitze der Slaven. f. Die franier in Siidrufllvnd (Leipzig).
  60. Venema, H. 1765: Commmta:rius ad librum prophetio.rum Jeremine. Vol. I (Leovardiae).
  61. Vian, F. 1963: us origines tk Wbes. Cadmos et ks spartes (Paris).
  62. Vinogradov, Yu.G. I 980: The Finger Ring of the King Scyles: the Political and Dynastic History of the Scythians in the First Half of the Vth century B.C .. SA 3, 92-109 (in Russian).
  63. Wilke, F. I 913: Das Sl-.:ythenproblem in Jeremiabuch. In Alttestamentische Studien R. Kittel zum 60. Geburtstag dargebracht (Leipzig), 222-254.
  64. Yadin, Y., and Geva, Sh. 1986: lrwestigatWns at Beth Shean. 7he Ear!Y Iron Age Strata (Jerusalem).
  65. Zaginailo, A.G. and Karyshkovskii, P.O. 1990: The Coins of the King Scyles. In Yanin, V.L., Nudelman, A.A. et al. (eds.) Numismatic Studies on the History qf the &uth-Eastem Europe (Kishinev), 3-15 (in Russian).
  66. Zawadzki, S. 1988: 7he Fall qf As.ryria and Median-Babylonian Relations in light qf the Nabopalassar Chronick (Poznan).
  67. Zgusta, L. I 955: Die Personennamen griechischer Stiidte der Nb"rdlichen Sclzwarzmeerkiiste (Prague). .z: • ....

Related papers

Destroy Your Enemy Becoming Your Friend: Priam and the Amazons in the Trojan War
Clotho / Κλωθώ

Clotho, 2024

The legend of the battle of Troy between the hero Achilles and the Amazon queen Penthesilea is one of the most famous stories in Greek mythology. However, we may wonder why the Amazons decided to travel to Troy and become allies of King Priam to fight the Achaeans. This fact is important, especially since this episode does not appear in Homer’s work, but the author does mention the Amazons on three occasions. In one of them, King Priam himself is the protagonist, in his youth. Many years before the Achaeans besieged his city, the young Priam traveled to Phrygia, where he decided to accompany the rulers Otreus and Mygdon on their campaign towards the river Sangarius. There, they were surprised by a group of Amazons who did not hesitate to attack them – for no apparent reason. This paper analyzes both episodes’ written and archaeological sources to explain why the Amazons decided to change their minds and become Priam’s allies after having fought against the Trojan ruler years before. It analyzes the motives of Queen Penthesilea to confront the Achaeans, which would result in her death at the hands of the hero Achilles, who was in love with her.

View PDFchevron_right
Once again “the Scythian” myth of origins (Herodotus 4.5–10)
Bruce Lincoln

Nordlit, 2014

Far from being authorless texts, eternal truths, and the authentic voice of the Volk (as Romantic theories have it), myths are narratives that disguise both their authorship and their tendentious nature. The two variants of “the” Scythian origin myth preserved in Herodotus 4.5–6 and 4.8–10 provide a convenient example of how close reading permits one to identify the interests advanced by each variant through the ways they rework details of the structure they have in common.

View PDFchevron_right
Recent advances in the history of the Scythians: the present state of the question from an archaeological perspective
José Luis Blesa

Isimu: Revista sobre Oriente Próximo y Egipto en la antigüedad, 2019

The present paper reviews the history of Scythian research since its rediscovery at the end of the 17th century, with the impressive findings of Scythian gold in the Ukrainian kurgans, up to the most recent German-Russian and French-Russian archaeological works in Siberia, Kazakhstan and Mongolia and through the numerous Soviet excavations, of which only a few of Western specialists echoed. Putting all of them into comparison, and without forgetting the philological investigations carried out in parallel, it is intended here to present the current state of knowledge of the history of the Scythians.

View PDFchevron_right
Periplus to the Unknown. The Greek Conquest of the Black Sea and the Origin of the Amazon Myths
Arturo Sanchez Sanz

Studia Antiqua et Archaeologica 30(1), pp. 5-36. ISSN 12242284, 2024

The aim of this paper is to address the colonisation of the Pontus in relation to the Amazon myths. An attempt will be made to clarify the difficulties in identifying both the initial contacts between the Greeks and the ancient steppe nomad peoples in that region and the origin of the Amazon myths on the basis of the apparently more egalitarian lifestyle of those societies 2. Similarly, the intention is to offer an explanation for the presence of iconographic pieces of an Amazon character in that liminal space. The Amazon kingdom, regardless of whether it has been located preferably in the southern Pontus or less frequently in its northern or eastern reaches, was undoubtedly connected with the Black Sea. Even though those myths are rooted in a time long before the period in which the region was colonised by the Greeks, they formed part of it, as occurred with many other accounts dealing with the Argonauts, Medea and so forth, with the mission of exploring those distant lands, bringing them closer to the Greek world and facilitating their control, as well as converting them into essential elements for identifying the 'other' and, by extension, Hellenic culture itself.

View PDFchevron_right
Alexander and the Amazons
Elizabeth Baynham

Classical …, 2001

One of the more intriguing stories in our historical traditions on Alexander the Great is the king's alleged sexual encounter with an Amazonian queen. The historicity of this tale was doubted even in antiquity and in modern times is often dismissed, understandably enough, as plain silly; for instance, in a recent paper, Elizabeth Carney facetiously remarks, 'we are not. . .really tempted to believe that Alexander got chummy with any Amazons!'' Carney's essay addresses two prominent themes in the Alexander traditions: the series of exchanges between Alexander and Parmenion, and the occasions when the Macedonian king shut himself away in his tent to sulk like Achilles. She explores the complex relationship between fact, reported fact, and literary embellishment, and clearly for Carney the Amazon tale represents a polar end of the spectrum, which can be safely classified as 'fiction'. But what is often passed over is why the Amazons should feature in the historical accounts of Alexander at all, and, equally, why they are as well represented as they are and at different times during the king's reign.2 The Amazons appear, in one context or another, in all our main Alexander sources, from the Alexander Romance (where one might most likely expect to find them) to the sober Arrian.' The sole exception is the Metz Epitome-and here we cannot be completely sure that they were not in the original text, but were mentioned just before the point where our extant text begins, or were edited out in some stage of the epitome's compilation. Even outside Alexander historiography the Amazons are among the most emotive and evocative figures in Greek culture. Amazon ethnography is a complex subject. Most traditions purporting to be 'historical' regard them as a race of female warriors, who dwelt around the Thermodon river, close by the Black Sea in remote Scythian t e r r i t~r y .~ theme also systematically exploited in rnythopoiesis The Amazon was ' See E. Carney, 'Artifice and Alexander history', in A. B. Bosworth and E. J. Baynham (edd.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Religion
  • Christianity
  • History
  • Sociology
  • Geography
  • Political Sciences
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved