Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 102908 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Arsae/CacheManager.php on line 36

Warning: http_response_code(): Cannot set response code - headers already sent (output started at /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Arsae/CacheManager.php:36) in /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Models/Response.php on line 17

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Arsae/CacheManager.php:36) in /opt/frankenphp/design.onmedianet.com/app/src/Models/Response.php on line 20
The rate of adaptation in asexuals - PMC Skip to main content
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2000 Jun;155(2):961–968. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.961

The rate of adaptation in asexuals.

H A Orr 1
PMCID: PMC1461099  PMID: 10835413

Abstract

I study the population genetics of adaptation in asexuals. I show that the rate of adaptive substitution in an asexual species or nonrecombining chromosome region is a bell-shaped function of the mutation rate: at some point, increasing the mutation rate decreases the rate of substitution. Curiously, the mutation rate that maximizes the rate of adaptation depends solely on the strength of selection against deleterious mutations. In particular, adaptation is fastest when the genomic rate of mutation, U, equals the harmonic mean of selection coefficients against deleterious mutations, where we assume that selection for favorable alleles is milder than that against deleterious ones. This simple result is independent of the shape of the distribution of effects among favorable and deleterious mutations, population size, and the action of clonal interference. In the course of this work, I derive an approximation to the probability of fixation of a favorable mutation in an asexual genome or nonrecombining chromosome region in which both favorable and deleterious mutations occur.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (137.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barton N. H. Linkage and the limits to natural selection. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):821–841. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Charlesworth B. The evolution of chromosomal sex determination and dosage compensation. Curr Biol. 1996 Feb 1;6(2):149–162. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00448-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dawson K. J. Evolutionarily stable mutation rates. J Theor Biol. 1998 Sep 7;194(1):143–157. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dawson K. J. The dynamics of infinitesimally rare alleles, applied to the evolution of mutation rates and the expression of deleterious mutations. Theor Popul Biol. 1999 Feb;55(1):1–22. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1998.1375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Drake J. W. A constant rate of spontaneous mutation in DNA-based microbes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Aug 15;88(16):7160–7164. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Drake J. W., Charlesworth B., Charlesworth D., Crow J. F. Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics. 1998 Apr;148(4):1667–1686. doi: 10.1093/genetics/148.4.1667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gerrish P. J., Lenski R. E. The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population. Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):127–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haigh J. The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population--Muller's Ratchet. Theor Popul Biol. 1978 Oct;14(2):251–267. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(78)90027-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hartl D. L., Taubes C. H. Compensatory nearly neutral mutations: selection without adaptation. J Theor Biol. 1996 Oct 7;182(3):303–309. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hill W. G., Robertson A. The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet Res. 1966 Dec;8(3):269–294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Johnson T. Beneficial mutations, hitchhiking and the evolution of mutation rates in sexual populations. Genetics. 1999 Apr;151(4):1621–1631. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.4.1621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnson T. The approach to mutation-selection balance in an infinite asexual population, and the evolution of mutation rates. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Dec 7;266(1436):2389–2397. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Keightley P. D., Eyre-Walker A. Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates. Genetics. 1999 Oct;153(2):515–523. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.2.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kibota T. T., Lynch M. Estimate of the genomic mutation rate deleterious to overall fitness in E. coli. Nature. 1996 Jun 20;381(6584):694–696. doi: 10.1038/381694a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kirby D. A., Stephan W. Multi-locus selection and the structure of variation at the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1996 Oct;144(2):635–645. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.2.635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Miralles R., Gerrish P. J., Moya A., Elena S. F. Clonal interference and the evolution of RNA viruses. Science. 1999 Sep 10;285(5434):1745–1747. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5434.1745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Orr H. A., Kim Y. An adaptive hypothesis for the evolution of the Y chromosome. Genetics. 1998 Dec;150(4):1693–1698. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.4.1693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Otto S. P., Barton N. H. The evolution of recombination: removing the limits to natural selection. Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):879–906. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Peck J. R. A ruby in the rubbish: beneficial mutations, deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. Genetics. 1994 Jun;137(2):597–606. doi: 10.1093/genetics/137.2.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Woodcock G., Higgs P. G. Population evolution on a multiplicative single-peak fitness landscape. J Theor Biol. 1996 Mar 7;179(1):61–73. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES