Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 8.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2013 Feb 8;16(1):59–62. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2013.01.001

The Battle with the Host over Microbial Size

Jeffrey N Weiser 1,2
PMCID: PMC3622179  NIHMSID: NIHMS440319  PMID: 23395472

Abstract

An eponymous feature of microbes is their small size, and size affects their pathogenesis. The recognition of microbes by host factors, for example, is often dependent on the density and number of molecular interactions occurring over a limited surface area. As a consequence, certain antimicrobial substances, such as complement, appear to target particles with a larger surface area more effectively. Although microbes may inhibit these antimicrobial activities by minimizing their effective size, the host uses defenses such as agglutination by immunoglobulin to counteract this microbial evasion strategy. Some successful pathogens in turn are able to prevent immune mediated clearance by expressing virulence factors that block agglutination. Thus, microbial size is one of the battlegrounds between microbial survival and host defense.

Introduction

Members of the microbial world span a great range of shapes and sizes. The selective value of microbial shape has been reviewed elsewhere(30). Differences in size are used to distinguish species and impact many aspects of microbial physiology and lifestyle. Bacterial cells, for example, range from 0.15 to 700 μM in length. In addition, for single-celled organisms, modulation of cell division or separation may significantly impact their effective size. For microbes residing in a mammalian host, size may be a determining factor in an infectious agent’s success or its clearance (13, 20, 27, 31). Many successful pathogens have evolved strategies to modulate their effective size to accommodate these challenges(14). The host in turn appears to target the ability of microbes to escape its defenses with their small size. By analyzing bacteria differing only in effective size it is possible to sort out some of the independent contributions of size to pathogenesis. These studies reveal that microbial size is a battleground in the interaction between pathogen and host.

Why microbial size matters

Most microbes are generally small to minimize their cellular volume and grow most efficiently. While prokaryotic species with large or giant cell morphology may be found in nature, these forms are generally not observed within mammalian hosts. However, pathogens that are typically small may form larger individual cells under certain growth conditions (Table 1). When cell division or septation is inhibited, long filamentous forms that may be 10 to 50 times longer than usual may result. Filamentous forms may occur, for example, during cultivation in sublethal concentrations of antibiotics. Filamentation by Escherichia coli during infection of the bladder has been shown to inhibit predation by neutrophils and macrophages, presumably because the extremely long size of the target particle exceeds the capacity of the professional phagocytes to surround and internalize it (10, 13). A similar inhibitory effect has been noted when bacteria aggregate to form biofilms, densely packed communities of sessile cells encased in an extracellular matrix, which are more resistant to clearance mechanisms than individual planktonic cells(5).

Filamentous forms and biofilms, however, are extreme examples of bacteria multiplying their effective size. More moderate inhibition of cell division, as demonstrated during growth of Staphylococcus aureus or Klebsiella pneumoniae in sublethal concentrations of antibiotics, may lead to enlarged cells that are more readily phagocytosed and killed(18). Experiments with 0.2–3 μM coated beads have shown that larger particles, if not too long to be internalized, enhance recognition by phagocytic cells, the formation of a phagocytic cup, and delivery to lysosomes(17). The greater surface area of larger targets optimizes recognition by allowing for more adhesive events and receptor-ligand interactions per particle. This velcro-like effect increases the stability of attachment to host cells. For phagocytic cells, this facilitates host-bacterial interactions that lead to killing and clearance. In contrast, more efficient attachment of microbial cells with a greater surface area could also promote adherence to non-phagocytic host cells. Such interactions could promote the persistence of an organism within its environmental niche. For instance, Streptococcus pneumoniae, which colonizes the mucosal surface of the upper respiratory tract, grows in chains that vary in length or numbers of cells depending on the completeness of peptidoglycan cleavage between daughter cells after cell division. Mutants that form longer chains and natural chain-forming variants show increased adherence to airway epithelial cells in culture(24). Accordingly, these chaining mutants outcompete their shorter parent, which displays mostly diplococcal forms, in vivo during nasopharyngeal colonization in a mouse model.

In contrast, once the requirements of epithelial attachment and airway colonization of the airway are bypassed during invasive infection, the virulence of S. pneumoniae mutants in the bloodstream is inversely correlated with their relative chain length(8). Evasion of the complement system, which is abundant in the serum and functions by either directly lysing its microbial target or by opsonizing it for uptake by phagocytes, is critical for a pathogen’s survival in the bloodstream. In fact, many of the most common invasive pathogens, including S. pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseriae meningitidis, are particularly small in size. Individuals with a deficiency in the complement pathway are more susceptible to a number of invasive infections, but in particular those caused by this group of organisms(22, 23). Following incubation in serum, activation of the alternative pathway by spontaneous hydrolysis of complement component 3 (C3) results in the covalent deposition of C3b on microbial surfaces through its reactive thioester bond. The density of C3 fragments deposited is proportional to the average length of chain-forming S. pneumoniae mutants. When wild-type strains were grown under conditions that affect average chain length, the deposition of C3 fragments was also proportional to average chain length. For a given surface, activation of the alternative pathway of complement is a stochastic process; once activated its spreads throughout the bacterial chain. Therefore, the greater the surface area of the particle, which in the case of the pneumococcus is seen with longer chain forms, the more likely that a focus of complement activation will be initiated. Accordingly, shorter chains that minimize their effective surface area are more virulent in a model of invasive infection, and this effect of size is complement dependent. The complement system, therefore, is an example of an important component of host defense for which the size of the target is an important factor in its effectiveness. Invasive pathogens that do not minimize their size are likely to depend on other means of evading complement, particularly the alternative pathway of complement activation. Likewise, bacteria within large communities may require additional mechanisms to evade complement activation(12). The effect of surface area on complement activation demonstrates how small size may contribute to bacterial virulence. Because many other antimicrobial substances are directed to the microbial surface, its area could also be a factor in their activity.

The host fights back

Although microbes may take advantage of their small surface area to evade key defenses such as the complement system, other aspects of the host response appear to circumvent this strategy. For example, the bivalent or multivalent binding of immunoglobulin agglutinates microbial targets to increase their effective size (Table 1). This process is demonstrated by the ‘threading reaction’, which refers to the inhibition of separation of daughter cells by the bridging of bound immunoglobulin during replication in the presence of cell surface antibody in convalescent serum(25). These threads resemble chains that then fold on themselves to generate clumps. The clumping or agglutinating effect of antibody has been correlated with protection from systemic infection by S. pneumoniae and Salmonella typhimurium(6, 7, 19). However, there has been little understanding of how agglutination of microbes contributes to host defense and neutralization of infectious targets(2). The clumping of microbial particles, which occurs during mucociliary defense, enhances mechanical clearance mechanisms, and, therefore, prevents dispersion and motility from allowing microbial escape. The agglutination of microbes also increases the effective surface area that can be targeted by complement and, thus, the likelihood of attaining a focus of activation. In fact, the degree of agglutination correlates with both complement activation and complement-dependent microbial killing(8). This ability of agglutinating antibody to promote complement activation is independent of any direct interaction between complement and antibody. Immunoglobulin G lacking its C3 binding Fc portion [the bivalent F(ab′)2 fragment of IgG] still promotes complement activation and killing, but only if it agglutinates its target. Even though Fab fragments that also lack Fc bind equally compared to F(ab′)2, these are monovalent and consequently do not agglutinate their target or promote complement activation or killing. This effect of F(ab′)2, but not Fab, has been shown for H. influenzae, for which activation of the complement cascade results in direct lysis, and for S. pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa where complement deposition causes opsonization and uptake by phagocytes(8, 28). In this manner, agglutinating antibody is able to subvert virulence factors such as capsular polysaccharide that otherwise limit complement deposition on the cell surface. This could account for the importance of both complement and anti-capsular antibody in host defense against small, encapsulated pathogens, including N. meningitidis, H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae.

An additional way in which the host brings microbes together, limits their spread, and increases their effective density is by the formation of molecular traps or nets. For example, secreted DNA/chromatin from neutrophils (NETs, neutrophil extracellular traps) forms a scaffold that ensnares microbes(1, 21). NETs both promote microbial clearance and complement activation(11). Molecular traps composed of self-assembling defensin protein to form fibrils or nanonets that surround and entangle bacteria have recently been described(9). The ability of molecular traps or nets to provide a nidus for complement activation that amplifies its antimicrobial effect on a group of contained microbes has not been fully investigated.

Evasion of host defenses based on size

If the immune response subverts the small effective size of microbes, are there ways that successful pathogens evade these defense mechanisms? The agglutinating effect of immunoglobulin requires antigen recognition; while diversity and variation of microbial surfaces provides a means of avoiding binding by antibody. Not all classes of immmunoglobulin are equivalent in their ability to agglutinate a target. On the mucosal surface, the most abundant antibody class is IgA, which is quadravalent in its secreted form (S-IgA). In the human respiratory tract, ~90% of the S-IgA is in the form of IgA1. The hinge region of human IgA1 is cleaved by target sequence specific bacterial proteases expressed by members of many genera that reside primarily within the human respiratory tract, including Neisseriae, Haemophilus, and Streptococcus(3, 15, 16). These encompass proteases of different enzymatic classes, indicating that the ability to cleave the hinge region of IgA1 is an example of convergent evolution. Cleavage of human IgA1 at its hinge leaves the Fab antigen binding regions intact but separates them from the portions bridging the four Fab fragments per molecule of S-IgA1. The net result is that the antigens remain covered by Fab fragments, but the multivalency and agglutinating activity of IgA1 is eliminated. Thus, IgA1-proteases are an example of a strategy used by microbes to minimize the ability of the immune response to increase their effective size (Table 1).

Other mechanisms that counteract the agglutination of microbes have been shown to promote their virulence. Clearance through the formation of NETs is inhibited by bacterial substances that prevent their aggregation by chromatin. For example, escape from NETs by Streptococcus pyogenes is facilitated by expression of the bacteriophage-encoded virulence factor Sda1, which has DNase activity(26, 29). Likewise, nuclease-expressing S. aureus are better able to degrade NETs, and this activity is associated with delayed clearance from the lung and increased mortality in a mouse model(4).

Therefore, successful pathogens have evolved a number of mechanisms that prevent their effective size and surface area from being increased by the host; these allow for survival in inhospitable host environments.

Conclusions

In summary, size may have a pronounced impact the interaction of microbes with their host. Successful pathogens may alter their effective size to evade clearance or promote adhesive interactions (Fig. 1). The host, in turn, may subvert the plasticity of microbes and their ability use their size as an advantage. Pathogenesis studies that rely on viable counts of organism in culture and do not routinely incorporate the use of microscopy are unlikely to control for the effects of microbial size described above.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the relationship between microbial size and key aspects of pathogenesis. Increased microbial size, whether by natural changes in cellular morphology (above) or via antibody-mediated agglutination (below), promotes deposition of complement component 3 (C3), complement-dependent killing, and adherence to host cells and tissues. Adapted from Dalia and Weiser (8).

Table I.

Factors Affecting Effective Microbial Target Size

Increasing Decreasing
Sublethal Concentration of Antibiotics (H)
Filamentation and Chaining (M)
Cell Division, Septation and Separation (M)
Formation of Biofilm Communities (M) Cell Dispersion and Motility (M)
Agglutination by Immunoglobulin (H) IgA1 Proteases (M)
Containment in Molecular Traps or Nets (H) DNases, Nucleases (M)

(M) Microbial Strategy

(H) Host Strategy

Highlights.

  • Microbial size varies and is a factor in interaction with a host.

  • Small microbial size allows for evasion of important host defenses.

  • Several host defenses function by increasing effective microbial size.

  • Some pathogens are able to evade defenses that target their small size.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the U.S. Public health Service grant numbers AI38446 and AI78538 to JNW.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Amulic B, Hayes G. Neutrophil extracellular traps. Curr Biol. 2011;21:R297–298. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ax W, Kanzy E, Seiler F. In-vivo phagocytosis: enhancement of bacterial clearance by native and enzyme-treated immunoglobulins. Immunobiology. 1981;159:349–365. doi: 10.1016/S0171-2985(81)80092-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bender MH, Weiser JN. The atypical amino-terminal LPNTG-containing domain of the pneumococcal human IgA1-specific protease is required for proper enzyme localization and function. Mol Microbiol. 2006;61:526–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05256.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Berends E, Horswill A, Haste N, Monestier M, Nizet V, von Köckritz-Blickwede M. Nuclease expression by Staphylococcus aureus facilitates escape from neutrophil extracellular traps. J Innate Immun. 2010;2:576–586. doi: 10.1159/000319909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bjarnsholt T, Jensen P, Burmolle M, Hentzer M, Haagensen J, Hougen H, Calum H, Madsen K, Moser C, Molin S, Høiby N, Givskov M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa tolerance to tobramycin, hydrogen peroxide and polymorphonuclear leukocytes is quorum-sensing dependent. Microbiology. 2005;151:373–383. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27463-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bull C. The agglutination of bacteria in vivo. J Exp Med. 1915;22:484–491. doi: 10.1084/jem.22.4.484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bull C. The mechanism of the curative action of antipneumococcus serum. J Exp Med. 1915;22:457–464. doi: 10.1084/jem.22.4.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8**.Dalia A, Weiser J. Minimization of bacterial size allows for complement evasion and is overcome by the agglutinating effect of antibody. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;10:486–496. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2011.09.009. This study shows that increasing pathogen surface area, whether by changes in cellular morphology or via antibody-mediated agglutination, promotes complement-dependent killing. The observations in this report on how cell size and morphology can affect virulence form the basis of many of the concepts outlined in this review article. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9*.Chu H, Pazgier M, Jung G, Nuccio S, Castillo P, de Jong M, Winter M, Winter S, Wehkamp J, Shen B, Salzman N, Underwood M, Tsolis R, Young G, Lu W, Lehrer R, Bäumler A, Bevins C. Human α-defensin 6 promotes mucosal innate immunity through self-assembled peptide nanonets. Science. 2012;337:477–481. doi: 10.1126/science.1218831. This study shows a novel function for the antimicrobial peptide Human α-defensin 6 (HD6) in mucosal defense. HD6 promotes clearance by assembling to form fibrils and nanonets that surround and entangle bacteria. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10*.Horvath DJ, Li B, Casper T, Partida-Sanchez S, Hunstad D, Hultgren S, Justice S. Morphological plasticity promotes resistance to phagocyte killing of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Microbes Infect. 2011;13:426–437. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.12.004. This study investigates the role of bacterial morphology in the survival of uropathogenic E. coli. The findings demonstrate that filamentous morphology provides a selective advantage by enhancing evasion of killing by phagocytes. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.JL, Martin M, Gullstrand B, Tydén H, Lood C, Truedsson L, Bengtsson A, Blom A. Neutrophil extracellular traps that are not degraded in systemic lupus erythematosus activate complement exacerbating the disease. J Immunol. 2012;188:3522–3531. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jensen E, Kharazmi A, Garred P, Kronborg G, Fomsgaard A, Mollnes T, Høiby N. Complement activation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Microb Pathog. 1993;15:377–388. doi: 10.1006/mpat.1993.1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Justice S, Hung C, Theriot J, Fletcher D, Anderson G, Footer M, Hultgren S. Differentiation and developmental pathways of uropathogenic Escherichia coli in urinary tract pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:1333–1338. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308125100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Justice S, Hunstad D, Cegelski L, Hultgren S. Morphological plasticity as a bacterial survival strategy. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:162–168. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kilian M, Reinholdt J. Immunoglobulin A1 proteases of pathogenic and commensal bacteria of the respiratory tract. In: NJP, editor. Colonization of mucosal surfaces. American Society for Microbiology Press; Washington, D.C: 2005. pp. 119–130. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kilian M, Reinholdt J, Lomholt H, Poulsen K, Frandsen E. Biological significance of IgA1 proteases in bacterial colonization and pathogenesis: critical evaluation of experimental evidence. APMIS. 1996;104:321–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1996.tb00724.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Koval M, Preiter K, Adles C, Stahl P, Steinberg T. Size of IgG-opsonized particles determines macrophage response during internalization. Exp Cell Res. 1998;242:265–273. doi: 10.1006/excr.1998.4110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Labro M, Pochet I, Babin-Chevaye C, Hakim J. Effect of ceftriaxone-induced alterations of bacteria on neutrophil bactericidal function. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987;20:857–869. doi: 10.1093/jac/20.6.857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Margni R, Parma E, Cerone S, Erpelding A, Perdigon G. Agglutinating and non-agglutinating antibodies in rabbits inoculated with a particulate antigen (Salmonella typhimurium) Immunology. 1983;48:351–359. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Okagaki L, Strain A, Nielsen J, Charlier C, Baltes N, Chretien F, Heitman J, Dromer F, Nielsen K. Cryptococcal cell morphology affects host cell interactions and pathogenicity. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000953. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Papayannopoulos V, Zychlinsky A. NETs: a new strategy for using old weapons. Trends Immunol. 2009;30:513–521. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2009.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Picard C, Puel A, Bustamante J, Ku C, Casanova J. Primary immunodeficiencies associated with pneumococcal disease. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;3:451–459. doi: 10.1097/00130832-200312000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ram S, Lewis L, Rice P. Infections of people with complement deficiencies and patients who have undergone splenectomy. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23:740–780. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00048-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24*.Rodriguez J, Dalia A, Weiser J. Increased chain length promotes pneumococcal adherence and colonization. Infect Immun. 2012;80:3454–9. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00587-12. This study demonstrates that the variable chain length of Streptococcus pneumoniae is a factor in its adhesive interactions in vitro and in vivo. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stryker L. Variations in the pneumococcus induced by growth in immune serum. J Exp Med. 1916;24:49–68. doi: 10.1084/jem.24.1.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sumby P, Barbian K, Gardner D, Whitney A, Welty D, Long R, Bailey J, Parnell M, Hoe N, Adams G, Deleo F, Musser J. Extracellular deoxyribonuclease made by group A Streptococcus assists pathogenesis by enhancing evasion of the innate immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:1679–1684. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406641102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sycuro L, Pincus Z, Gutierrez K, Biboy J, Stern C, Vollmer W, Salama N. Peptidoglycan crosslinking relaxation promotes Helicobacter pylori’s helical shape and stomach colonization. Cell. 2010;141:822–833. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Trautmann M, Triest K, Hofstaetter T, Seiler F, Hahn H. Influence of different immunoglobulin G preparations on phagocytosis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by polymorphonuclear granulocytes. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg. 1985;259:104–117. doi: 10.1016/s0176-6724(85)80012-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29**.Walker M, Hollands A, Sanderson-Smith M, Cole J, Kirk J, Henningham A, McArthur J, Dinkla K, Aziz R, Kansal R, Simpson A, Buchanan J, Chhatwal G, Kotb M, Nizet V. DNase Sda1 provides selection pressure for a switch to invasive group A streptococcal infection. Nat Med. 2007;13:981–985. doi: 10.1038/nm1612. This study demonstrate a novel role of bacteriophage encoded DNase (Sda1) in the pathogenesis of Streptococcus pyogenes. SdaI facilitates microbial escape from entrapment by neutrophil derived DNA in extracellular traps (NETS) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Young K. The selective value of bacterial shape. Microbial Mol Biol Rev. 2006;70:660–703. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00001-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zaragoza O, Garcıa-Rodas R, Nosanchuk J, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodrguez-Tudela J, Casadevall A. Fungal cell gigantism during mammalian infection. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000945. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES