Abstract
Herein, we describe the first total syntheses of five members of the dimeric nuphar alkaloids: (+)-6,6′-dihydroxythiobinupharidine (+)-1a, (+)-6-hydroxythiobinupharidine (+)-1b, (−)-6,6′-dihydroxythionuphlutine (−)-2a, (−)-6,6′-dihydroxyneothiobinupharidine (−)-3a, and (+)-6,6′-dihydroxyneothionuphlutine (+)-4a. The latter two have not been found in Nature. We have also made each of their enantiomers (−)-1a–b, (+)-2a, (+)-3a, and (−)-4a. The key step in these syntheses was the dimerization of an α-aminonitrile (a hydrolytically-stable surrogate for its corresponding hemiaminal) with chiral Lewis acid complexes. We have also reassigned the literature structures of (+)-1a–1b—for those instances in which the NMR spectra were obtained in CD3OD—to their corresponding CD3O– adducts. Our efforts provide for the first time apoptosis data for (−)-3a, (+)-4a, and all five non-natural antipodes prepared. The data indicate high apoptotic activity regardless of the enantiomer or relative stereochemical configuration at C7 and C7′.
Keywords: apoptosis, caspase, cancer, synthesis, nuphar
In 2006, Yoshikawa and co-workers reported that 6-hydroxythiobinupharidine (+)-1b induces apoptosis in U937 human leukemia cells within 1 h (2.5–10 μM).[1] To their knowledge, this was the most rapid induction of apoptosis by a small molecule ever reported. Additional experiments based on incubation with 20 μM of specific caspase inhibitors implicated activation of caspases 8 and 3 (but not caspase 9). Gopas and co-workers subsequently reported that partially purified combination extracts of (+)-1b and (−)-2b inhibit NFκB signaling.[2] Despite the unprecedented speed with which the dimeric nuphar alkaloids are able to induce apoptosis, it is surprising that no other studies on their biological mechanism of action have been published. Previous reports also show that (+)-1b is an effective anti-bacterial,[3] anti-fungal,[4] and immunosuppressant agent.[5]
The dimeric nuphar alkaloids are structurally unique sulfur-containing triterpenoids isolated from the yellow water lilies, Nuphar pumilum, Nuphar japonicum, and Nuphar lutea, and were first described by Achmatowicz and co-workers (Figure 1).[6] Three series (i.e. thiobinupharidines (+)-1a–d, thionuphlutines (−)-2a–d, and neothiobinupharidines 3b–d), whose structures differ in the relative stereochemical configurations at C7 and C7′, are known.[7] However, neither (−)-3a from the neothiobinupharidine series nor any of the members of the neothionuphlutine series 4a–d have been found in Nature.
Figure 1.
Dimeric nuphar alkaloids.
LaLonde proposed a biosynthetic mechanism for the formation of the gross structures of the dimeric nuphar alkaloids beginning from elimination/oxidation of (−)-nupharidine (Scheme 1).[8] Attack of ene-iminium 6 with an ambiphilic sulfur reagent 7 would initiate dimerization through formation of the central thiaspirane ring. Hydration or reduction of bis-iminium 10 would result in compounds 1–4. Shenvi and co-workers proved the feasibility of LaLonde’s proposal by completing the first and only total synthesis of a member of the dimeric nuphar alkaloids, (−)-neothiobinupharidine (−)-3d,[9] which unfortunately is not active in apoptosis assays.[1] Yoshikawa reported that at least one hemiaminal is required for there to be substantial apoptotic activity.
Scheme 1.
LaLonde’s proposed biosynthesis.
Considering 1) the unprecedented speed at which the dimeric nuphar alkaloids are able to induce apoptosis, 2) the lack of information regarding their biological mechanism of action, and 3) their complex and exquisite chemical structure, we decided to pursue the total syntheses of the biologically active hydroxylated dimeric nuphar alkaloids. In the absence of any catalysts or promoters, Shenvi reports that dimerization favors the formation of the stereochemical relationship corresponding to the neothiobinupharidine architecture (4:1 series 3 versus all others).[9] Thus, the principle challenge we faced was how to override the inherent diastereochemical outcome at C7 and C7′ during the formation of the thiaspirane ring.
Although the requisite ene-iminium 6 (Scheme 1) can be derived from hemiaminal 11 (Scheme 2), this is a hydrolytically labile compound that cannot be purified by chromatography and must be freshly made before each use. We therefore elected to pursue a strategy employing nitrile (−)-12 as a “masked” hemiaminal that is both chromatographically and hydrolytically stable.[10–12] We further reasoned that promoting the dimerization by application of chiral Brønsted or Lewis acids to (−)-12 would generate a chiral ion pair intermediate 13 in which the stereochemical information of counterion A*− could assist in the control of facial selectivity (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2.
Strategy for controlling facial selectivity in thiaspirane formation.
We prepared both enantiomers of 14 using known methods.[9,13,14] We then converted (−)-14 to the nitrile (−)-12 by oxidation to the N-oxide, followed by Polonovski rearrangement and quenching with KCN (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3.
Synthesis of nitrile 14.
With (−)-12 in hand, we surveyed an extensive set of chiral and achiral Brønsted acids and Lewis acid complexes for their ability to alter the intrinsic selectivity at C7/C7′ in dimerization reactions with Na2S4. These included chiral phosphoric acids and numerous permutations of Lewis acids and ligands. Table 1 is an abbreviated summary of these studies (for a complete list, see SI). The products obtained are bis-nitriles 15–18. The assignment of stereochemical configuration at C7/C7′ was accomplished by converting them to the corresponding fully reduced compounds 1d, 2d, 3d, and 4d, then comparing with literature data. After considerable experimentation, we identified In(OTf)3/(3R,8S)-22 as the optimal Lewis acid–ligand[15–17] combination for generating (+)-15 (corresponds to thiobinupharidine configuration) (entry 16), while Cu(OTf)2 alone gave predominantly (−)-17 (corresponds to neothiobinupharidine configuration) (entry 1). Under these conditions, we could obtain synthetically useful amounts of all stereoisomers 15–18. The use of chiral phosphoric acids or catalytic amounts of Lewis acids was not optimal. That there was no pronounced matched-mismatched effect with different antipodes of ligands suggests that the mechanism of dimerization may be more complex than simple substrate-ligand interaction.
Table 1.
Optimization of dimerization
![]() | |||
---|---|---|---|
Entry[a] | Metal | Ligand[b] | 15:16:17:18[c] |
1 | Cu(OTf)2 | none | 0.2 : 0.2 : 1.0 : 0.3 |
7% : 6% : 51% : 10% | |||
2 | Sc(OTf)3 | none | 0.3 : 0.3 : 1.0 : 0.2 |
3 | In(OTf)3 | none | 0.3 : 0.2 : 1.0 : 0.2 |
4 | Cu(OTf)2 | (S)-19a | 0.4 : 0.2 : 1.0 : 0.3 |
5 | Sc(OTf)3 | (S)-19a | 0.4 : 0.2 : 1.0 : 0.2 |
6 | In(OTf)3 | (S)-19a | 0.3 : 0.2 : 1.0 : 0.2 |
7 | Cu(OTf)2 | (R)-19a | 0.4 : 0.2 : 1.0 : 0.2 |
8 | In(OTf)3 | (R)-19a | 0.9 : 0.2 : 1.0 : 0.2 |
9 | In(OTf)3 | (R)-19b | 0.8 : 0.3 : 1.0 : 0.2 |
10 | In(OTf)3 | (R)-19c | 0.9 : 0.3 : 1.0 : 0.3 |
11 | In(OTf)3 | (R)-19d | 1.1 : 0.3 : 1.0 : 0.2 |
12 | In(OTf)3 | (4R,5S)-20a | 1.1 : 0.3 : 1.0 : 0.2 |
13 | In(OTf)3 | (4R,5S)-20c | 1.0 : 0.3 : 1.0 : 0.3 |
14 | In(OTf)3 | (4R,5R)-21 | 1.0 : 0.3 : 1.0 : 0.2 |
15 | Cu(OTf)2 | none | 0.2 : 0.2 : 1.0 : 0.3 |
16 | In(OTf)3 | (3R,8S)-22 | 1.9 : 0.4 : 1.0 : 0.3 |
42% : 8% : 23% : 6% | |||
17 | In(OTf)3 | (3S,8R)-22 | 1.6 : 0.3 : 1.0 : 0.3 |
Isolated yields for selected entries provided in cells below.
We then converted bis-nitrile (+)-15 to the corresponding bis-hemiaminal (+)-1a by treatment with AgNO3 in MeCN/H2O at 45 °C (85% yield, Scheme 4).[18] The preparation of 2a–4a was carried out in a similar fashion and in comparable yields. Selective mono-reduction of the C6′ hemiaminal over the one at C6 in 1a could be accomplished to give 1b.[19] This type of chemoselective reduction appears limited to 1a as similar attempts on 2a–4a resulted in numerous reduction products. The absolute stereochemical configurations as depicted in Figure 1 are the naturally occurring ones, but we also completed the syntheses of the non-natural (or predicted non-natural) antipodes (−)-1a–b, (+)-2a, (+)-3a, and (−)-4a.
Scheme 4.
Completion of synthesis.
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of synthetic (+)-1a–1b in both CD3OD and CDCl3 were identical to both reported literature values and to the spectra of materials isolated from Nuphar lutea carried out by our group (see SI for isolation/purification details).[20–23] However, if the data acquisition for the NMR spectrum in CD3OD preceded that of the experiment in CDCl3, then noticeable differences between synthetic and literature values were apparent in the CDCl3 1H NMR spectra. No differences were observed in the CD3OD spectrum. Under these circumstances, if we removed the CD3OD in vacuo and allowed the residue to age in air, the material slowly converted back to (+)-1a–1b as judged by 1H NMR spectroscopy in CDCl3. The conversion was greatly facilitated if the residue was washed with saturated aq. NaHCO3. We speculated that in CD3OD, (+)-1a–1b is converted to the CD3O– adducts 23a and 24a (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Revised structures
Indeed, when we dissolved (+)-1a–b in CH3OH, then removed the excess methanol and obtained the 1H NMR spectra in CDCl3, new singlet resonances integrating to 3H each were present. We assigned these resonances to the methoxy protons in 23b–24b. From these data, we believe it necessary to revise those literature structures of (+)-1a–b—in which NMR experiments was carried out in CD3OD—to the corresponding CD3O– adducts 23a and 24a. It is likely that an analogous revision of 2a is warranted. The ethoxylated versions of some dimeric nuphar alkaloids has been noted, but there is some disagreement as to whether these were artifacts of the isolation/purification process.[24,25]
We then assayed both enantiomers of 1a–1b, 2a, 3a, 4a, as well as bis-nitriles 15–18 for their apoptotic properties against the human U937 cell line as judged by caspase cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), a marker of apoptosis (Table 2 and Figure 3). The activity of synthetic (+)-1a–1b and (−)-2a were similar to that of the corresponding materials we isolated from Nuphar lutea (see SI for full data set). Moreover, the mono- and dihydroxylated dimeric nuphar alkaloids all exhibited nearly the same activity, regardless of their absolute or relative stereochemical configurations. And, it appears that the (−)-3a not found in nature seems to be the most potent at the 1 h time point (entry 7). Bis-nitriles 16–18 exhibited no apoptotic activity.
Table 2.
Apoptosis assays (PARP Cleavage).
Entry | Cmpd | antipode | 1 h[a] | 6 h[a] |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | (+)-1a | natural | -- | 5.0 |
2 | (−)-1a | unnatural | -- | 2.5 |
3 | (+)-1b | natural | -- | 5.0 |
4 | (−)-1b | unnatural | -- | 5.0 |
5 | (−)-2a | natural | -- | 2.5 |
6 | (+)-2a | unnatural | -- | 5.0 |
7 | (−)-3a | predicted natural | 5 | 1.25 |
8 | (+)-3a | predicted unnatural | 10 | 2.5 |
9 | (+)-4a | predicted natural | -- | 2.5 |
10 | (−)-4a | predicted unnatural | -- | 2.5 |
Minimum concentration (μM) at which at least 50% or greater of PARP cleavage is observed. -- indicates that no PARP cleavages was observed up to 10 μM for at least 6 h.
Figure 3.
Representative western blots for PARP cleavage.
In conclusion, we have successfully completed the first syntheses of several hydroxylated nuphar alkaloids. This was accomplished by means of dimerization of nitrile (−)-12, promoted by chiral Lewis acid complexes. Chemoselective mono-reduction of (+)-6,6′-dihydroxythiobinupharidine (+)-1a furnished (+)-6-hydroxythiobinupharidine (+)-1b. Moreover, for the first time, apoptosis data is available for these compounds. PARP cleavage assays confirm their ability to induce very rapid apoptosis in human U937 cells (within 1 h). We anticipate that these compounds will serve as useful tools for dissecting an important, but as yet undefined step in the regulation of apoptosis. Studies to clarify the biological mechanism by which they operate are ongoing.
Supplementary Material
Footnotes
Supporting information for this article is given via a link at the end of the document.
Contributor Information
Prof. John MacMillan, Email: john.macmillan@utsouthwestern.edu.
Prof. Alan Eastman, Email: alan.r.eastman@dartmouth.edu.
Prof. Jimmy Wu, Email: jimmy.wu@dartmouth.edu.
References
- 1.Matsuda H, Yoshida K, Miyagawa K, Nemoto Y, Asao Y, Yoshikawa M. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett. 2006;16:1567–1573. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.12.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ozer J, Eisner N, Ostrozhenkova E, Bacher A, Eisenreich W, Benharroch D, Golan-Goldhirsh A, Gopas J. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009;8:1860–1868. doi: 10.4161/cbt.8.19.9567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Okamura S, Nishiyama E, Yamazaki T, Otsuka N, Taniguchi S, Ogawa W, Hatano T, Tsuchiya T, Kuroda T. Biochim Biophys Acta - Gen Subj. 2015;1850:1245–1252. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cullen WP, LaLonde RT, Wang CJ, Wong CF. J Pharm Sci. 1973;62:826–827. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600620530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yamahara J, Shimoda H, Matsuda H, Yoshikawa M. Biol Pharm Bull. 1996;19:1241–1243. doi: 10.1248/bpb.19.1241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Achmatowicz O, Bellen Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1962;17:1121–1124. [Google Scholar]
- 7.LaLonde RT, Wong C. Pure Appl Chem. 1977;49:169–181. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wong CF, LaLonde RT. Experientia. 1975;31:15–16. doi: 10.1007/BF01924651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jansen DJ, Shenvi RA. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:1209–1212. doi: 10.1021/ja310778t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Myers AG, Zhong B, Kung DW, Movassaghi M, Lanman BA, Kwon S. Org Lett. 2000;2:3337–3340. doi: 10.1021/ol006427s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yang KS, Nibbs AE, Türkmen YE, Rawal VH. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:16050–16053. doi: 10.1021/ja409012q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yang KS, Rawal VH. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136:16148–16151. doi: 10.1021/ja510135t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Moran WJ, Goodenough KM, Raubo P, Harrity JPa. Org Lett. 2003;5:3427–3429. doi: 10.1021/ol035156t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Goodenough KM, Moran WJ, Raubo P, Harrity JPA. J Org Chem. 2005;70:207–213. doi: 10.1021/jo048455k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lu J, Ji SJ, Teo YC, Loh TP. Org Lett. 2005;7:159–161. doi: 10.1021/ol047711c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Teo Y, Tan K, Loh T. Org Lett. 2005;7:2743–2745. doi: 10.1021/ol051018n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cook GR, Kargbo R, Maity B. Org Lett. 2005;7:2767–2770. doi: 10.1021/ol051160o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wu YC, Zhu J. Org Lett. 2009;11:5558–5561. doi: 10.1021/ol9024919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lalonde RT, Wong CF, Das KC. J Org Chem. 1974;39:2892–2897. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wakao S, Ishikado A, Murakami N, Yamahara J, Matsuda H. Heterocycles. 1997;45:1815–1824. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lalonde RT, Wong CF, Cullen WP. Tetrahedron Lett. 1970;11:4477–4480. [Google Scholar]
- 22.LaLonde RT, Wong CF, Das KC. J Am Chem Soc. 1973;95:6342–6349. doi: 10.1021/ja00800a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Martin TI, MacLean DB, Wróbel JT, Iwanow a, Starzec W. Can J Chem. 1974;52:2705–2713. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lalonde RT. Fed Sci Techn Inform P B Rep. 1970 [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wrobel JT, Gielzynska M, Iwanow A, Starzec W, Achmatowicz O. Bull l’Academie Pol des Sci Ser des Sci Chim. 1973;21:543–546. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.