Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard
|
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
For sensitive matters, you may contact an individual bureaucrat directly by e-mail.
The Bureaucrats' noticeboard is a place where items related to the Bureaucrats can be discussed and coordinated. Any user is welcome to leave a message or join the discussion here. Please start a new section for each topic.
This is not a forum for grievances. It is a specific noticeboard addressing Bureaucrat-related issues. If you want to know more about an action by a particular bureaucrat, you should first raise the matter with them on their talk page. Please stay on topic, remain civil, and remember to assume good faith. Take extraneous comments or threads to relevant talk pages.
If you are here to report that an RFA or an RFB is "overdue" or "expired", please wait at least 12 hours from the scheduled end time before making a post here about it. There are a fair number of active bureaucrats; and an eye is being kept on the time remaining on these discussions. Thank you for your patience.
To request that your administrator status be removed, initiate a new section below.
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
![]() | It is 22:23:36 on October 13, 2025, according to the server's time and date. |
Intadmin for 0xDeadbeef
0xDeadbeef (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi all, per User:Novem Linguae/Essays/Linking GitHub to MediaWiki, linking from Git to Wikipedia is a common pain point, so I've started a BRFA that would make it easier. This bot requires interface admin permissions, so I am required to have interface admin permissions too.
I have a decent amount of knowledge about JS/CSS, but I'll be very careful when it comes to editing site-wide JS/CSS or gadgets with a lot of users. I don't expect to edit very high risk pages much, and should I do it I will be very very careful. Thank you for your consideration. beef [talk] 05:03, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Support. Trusted user. Even if the bot doesn't get consensus, I have no problems with deadbeef being an interface administrator. –Novem Linguae (talk) 17:03, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Support. Easily a trustworthy user. I echo what Novem said above, I fully trust Deadbeef with intadmin, and have no concerns about their clearly demonstrated technical abilities. EggRoll97 (talk) 18:59, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- Duh. Qualified doesn't even begin to describe it. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:08, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Desysop request (Gimmetrow)
Gimmetrow (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I had thought I had the time to be more active, but it didn't happen, and I won't have time in the near future. Gimmetrow 17:26, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for finally acknowledging this. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:34, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Good timing :) —Fortuna, imperatrix 19:00, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- Gimmetrow, despite filing Wikipedia:Administrator recall/Gimmetrow: I wish you the best, and thank you for the amount of work you have put in over the last 20 years. As Floq said on your talk page, your work is not diminished just because it was bunched up in the first 10 years of your editing career. Best regards, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 21:08, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Done. Primefac (talk) 01:15, 25 May 2025 (UTC)