Talk:Masturbation
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Masturbation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14Auto-archiving period: 30 days ![]() |
![]() | Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
The main points of this FAQ (Talk:Masturbation#FAQ) can be summarized as:
More detail is given on this point, below.
Q1: Why don't you state masturbation addiction as fact?
A1: Our policies on Wikipedia, in particular WP:WEIGHT and WP:FRINGE, require us to provide coverage to views based on their prominence within reliable sources, and we must reflect the opinion of the scientific community as accurately as possible. For example, if the APA will include masturbation addiction in the DSM, then Wikipedia will rubber-stamp its decision. Otherwise, Wikipedia isn't here to give a "fair and balanced" treatment to your pet ideas. In this respect, Wikipedia is merely a mirror which reflects medical orthodoxy. There is no official document from WHO, AMA, APA, Cochrane or APA which would imply that sex/porn/masturbation addiction would be a valid diagnosis. (CSBD isn't an addiction.)
Q2: Why don't you state that porn use is paraphilia (pictophilia)?
A2: The majority of US men use porn.[1][2][3][4][5] What the majority does is axiomatically clinically normal in psychiatry. According to The Huffington Post, 70% of men and 30% of women watch porn.[6] Quite probably, the majority of US population between ages 18 and 35 use porn at least once a week.[7]
DSM-5 code for pornography use? Not any. ICD-10 code for pornography use? Not any. ICD-11 code for pornography use? Not any. So, of course it isn't paraphilia. Even allowing that an excessive obsession with porn is paraphilia, normal (ordinary) porn use isn't. Past discussions
References
|
![]() | Masturbation is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
![]() | This is not a forum for general discussion of your personal experiences or stories about masturbation, nor is it for links to sites with masturbation material. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about masturbation at the Reference desk, discuss relevant Wikipedia policy at the Village pump, or ask for help at the Help desk. |
![]() | This topic contains controversial issues, some of which have reached a consensus for approach and neutrality, and some of which may be disputed. Before making any potentially controversial changes to the article, please carefully read the discussion-page dialogue to see if the issue has been raised before, and ensure that your edit meets all of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please also ensure you use an accurate and concise edit summary. |
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 3. |
"Bronha" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Bronha has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 29 § Bronha until a consensus is reached. Thepharoah17 (talk) 01:59, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
Graf discussing its harmlessness in the lead
[edit]it's all true, and I understand including it, but does it really need to be in the lead? it feels odd to go out of the way to detail all the ways something ISNT harmful. where else do we see such a lengthy discussion of harmlessness in the lead of an article? Twistybrastrap (talk) 03:52, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- Because of superstition: a lot of people from India and China think that masturbation is harmful. See Dhat syndrome and Shenkui. That was also the opinion of Western medicine in the 18th and 19th centuries. tgeorgescu (talk) 04:34, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- As I said, I understand including the information in the article. But why in the lead? Where else do we see such a lengthy discussion of something's harmlessness in a lead? Twistybrastrap (talk) 14:56, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
New picture
[edit]We shpuld add a picture of a sex toy that helps masterbate Luke161525 (talk) 15:38, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia objectionable content
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class vital articles in Everyday life
- B-Class Sexology and sexuality articles
- Top-importance Sexology and sexuality articles
- WikiProject Sexology and sexuality articles
- B-Class Pornography articles
- Top-importance Pornography articles
- B-Class Top-importance Pornography articles
- WikiProject Pornography articles
- Wikipedia controversial topics