User talk:CatchMe

Concern regarding Draft:List of songs by Raye

Hello, CatchMe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of songs by Raye, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

WikiCup 2025 September newsletter

The fourth round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 29 August. The penultimate round saw three contestants score more than 800 points:

• BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,175 round points, mainly from sports-related articles, including 17 good articles, 27 did you know articles, and 9 in the news articles
• Arconning (submissions) with 1,090 round points, mainly from articles about athletes and politicians, including a featured article on Philippines at the 1924 Summer Olympics, 9 good articles, 28 did you know articles, and a wide assortment of featured and good article reviews
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 854 round points, mostly from a high-scoring featured article on the Indian leader Rani of Jhansi and two good articles, in addition to 13 featured and good article reviews

Everyone who competed in Round 4 will advance to Round 5 unless they have withdrawn. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far, while the full scores for Round 4 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 9 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 98 good articles, 9 good topic articles, more than 150 reviews, nearly 100 did you know articles, and 18 in the news articles.

In advance of the fifth and final round, the judges would like to thank every contestant for their hard work. As a reminder, any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed in Round 5. In addition, note that Round 5 will end on 31 October at 23:59 UTC. Awards at the end of Round 5 will be distributed based on who has the most tournament points over all five rounds, and special awards will be distributed based on high performance in particular areas of content creation (e.g., most featured articles in a single round).

Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges – Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), Frostly (talk · contribs), Guerillero (talk · contribs) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) – are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:If it ain't broke, don't fix it

You've referred this essay whenever the edit conflict occured with me, (or, perhaps, with others) but as I said multiple times that it's an essay, not a guideline, so it is unenforceable to limit others' edits. Actually, changing from Hlist to Flatlist is making editors edit easier, and that's why some users (including me) use that way in various album articles. And as I'm sorry that you reported me immediately without a trial to talk with me (in my talk page), I opened this discussion to talk with you. Hope you understand this. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 04:34, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Why would that insignificant change make editing easier? And removing random spaces or adding unnecessary capital letters to templates? Editing just for the sake of editing is not something helpful, and most of those edits come with removals of actual relevant information. PS: It's hard to understand with the translator typos. CatchMe (talk · contribs) 04:44, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Is adding capital letters to templates wrong? And removing spaces from section is wrong? The reason why I did these are, actually templates' names start with capital letters, so I fixed to capital, and for the latter, those spaces aren't needed. As I said multiple times, that essay is not a guideline, and there's no even guidelines like "do not edit unnecessarily". For your PS, I don't get it because I didn't even use a translator in here. But please be polite, not using aggressive tone to me. Thanks. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 04:50, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Neither wrong nor helpful, and I guess we're just ignoring the removals. For the "aggressive tone", that actually never happened. CatchMe (talk · contribs) 18:37, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

As you said, it's not that major edits, then you can keep them but why reverting it? Just because it's not a major edit? It doesn't even harm the articles either. Plus, people can accept it as aggressive because you said edits I've done is "unnecessary" and concluding that I've used a translator even though there's no translator typos(?). Camilasdandelions (talk!) 23:00, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Warning

Your recent editing history at Eusexua Afterglow shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. An edit war occurs when two or more users begin repeatedly reverting content on a page in a back-and-forth fashion to restore it back to how they think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree with their changes. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or undo the edits made by other editors when your changes are reverted. Instead, please use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. The best practice at this time is to stop editing the page and to discuss the disagreements, issues, and concerns at-hand with the other editors involved in the dispute. Wikipedia provides a page that helps to detail how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard, or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

Continuing to engage in further edit warring behavior can result in being blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your demeanor, behavior, or conduct indicate that you intend to continue repeatedly making reverts to the page.
As I opened discussion in the article, please participate in it. Camilasdandelions (talk!) 00:18, 28 September 2025 (UTC)