User talk:Czello

	Archives
	User talk:Czello/Archive 1; User talk:Czello/Archive 2; User talk:Czello/Archive 3; User talk:Czello/Archive 4; User talk:Czello/Archive 5; User talk:Czello/Archive 6; User talk:Czello/Archive 7; User talk:Czello/Archive 8; User talk:Czello/Archive 9; User talk:Czello/Archive 10; User talk:Czello/Archive 11; User talk:Czello/Archive 12;

Far right Advance UK

I appreciate you have a source. But who are you? What is your source. Advance UK take issue with being labelled far right - see their posts on X. I am happy to discuss further but you must appreciate that in the UK (are you British) far right is a perjorative term used by political opponents. Have you read their postings? Dunkelmann (talk) 12:19, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whether they protest the label is not relevant. See WP:MANDY. No party is ever going to not protest that label.

The source is in the article, and whether I'm British or not is also not relevant. — Czello ^(music) 12:21, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am sorry. But when there is a dispute who decides whether it gets left, amended or removed. As a novice at this I understood everyone has an opportunity to amend. But it seems there are editors who have a final say. I am learning so help me out here. I see you have a lot of experience and I have none.

How do I raise a dispute over the use of the term?

If someone edited a page of a famous person and misdescribed them presumably some check would be made? I wonder if it is possible to see why prior editors used the term? Dunkelmann (talk) 14:13, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No editor has a final say on Wikipedia, not even admins. Everything is decided by WP:CONSENSUS building. You've done the right thing by starting a talk page discussion - I'd wait and see if more people chime in before taking it further. — Czello ^(music) 14:15, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Triple Crown (professional wrestling)

Hi @Czello. Since 81.106.144.198 has been blocked for one week, but there's another Triple Crown article the IP involved before that, which is messy and fancruft edits. Would you take a look? Thanks for your time. 183.171.120.139 (talk) 10:57, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean the professional wrestling one or a different one? If so could you link it and I'll take a look. I've taken a glance through the professional wrestling one but everything appears to be sourced (although the male NWA entry seems to use a spurious Wordpress blog). — Czello ^(music) 11:57, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thrash Metal

Don't trust unreliable sources, thrash is very aggressive, progressive rock has nothing, its evolution is speed metal. All the rest is just a forcing filler and always speculative.

You are the only ones to create this mythomania, in the other languages speed metal is the fundamental actor in the creation of Thrash, there is no need to think about it, the other is a forced invention to magnify a genre that is not technical at all nor fast, well look at you. 181.42.43.118 (talk) 07:30, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The statement is talking about the technicality in relation to thrash, not the aggression. I specifically moved the wording so that "aggression" is associated with punk, not prog. — Czello ^(music) 07:34, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Uh oh!

Looks like Damo/Skyler is back on deck. New IP/One of the IPs previously reported. Same provider and general area of New Zealand. He's accusing me of WP:OWN wrongly. Addicted4517 (talk) 08:35, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And again here. Addicted4517 (talk) 01:47, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Best thing to do is open an SPI. They won't be able to do a checkuser but the evidence might do it. — Czello ^(music) 06:45, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be able to do it? I just could not be bothered. I just stopped myself from returning fire on the Rhea Ripley talk page. A source there would solve everything, and I already said the doco itself was not enough due to the controversy Bryan Alcarez referred to. Addicted4517 (talk) 06:48, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on mobile for the foreseeable future so I don't think I can I'm afraid — Czello ^(music) 06:57, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Sorry for grave dancing on User:Hun Narkphanit. I saw that he was a sockpuppet who reverted some of my edits I thought it be a great idea. It is my mistake and I take responsibility. KashanAbbas (talk) 12:18, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My Bad

I didn't know currently was a term that Wikipedia didn't like. Cenation Dog (talk) 11:06, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. WP:CURRENTLY is good reading for this; typically we like to say "As of XXXX, they are signed to" — Czello ^(music) 11:15, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Cenation Dog (talk) 11:47, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of AEW Women's World Champions

I think it is time to start it. 10 champions and 15 reigns while men's title has 9 champions and 14 reigns, and it already has its own list. --Mann Mann (talk) 16:14, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I'll put it together when I get a moment! — Czello ^(music) 17:03, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BlueAnon?

The thread was closed, but I couldn't help but notice your use of the term BlueAnon. BlueAnon is not a thing. It's a right wing rhetorical trick that employs whataboutisms to downplay the importance of QAnon in the MAGAsphere, while simultaneously painting legitimate criticism of Donald Trump as conspiracy theories. It's just another name for "Trump derangement syndrome". 46.97.170.26 (talk) 13:05, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's a way of pointing out that there are wild conspiracy theories about Trump that are on the level of those coming from MAGA, e.g. stolen election theories. — Czello ^(music) 13:07, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's own article on the subject does not support your claim. 46.97.170.26 (talk) 18:22, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not concerned. — Czello ^(music) 21:39, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relationships

Czello, the thing is we typically do only marriages in a BLP, unless we're talking about well-documented and important relationships. What we have here is really not that. Drmies (talk) 15:05, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In all fairness, we typically have included relationships like these when they're between two notable wrestlers. — Czello ^(music) 17:47, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know what fairness has to do with it, but outside of rasslin, no. Drmies (talk) 23:33, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]