Jump to content

User talk:fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1, 2, many LLMs

[edit]

I can see what gave you LLM vibes from Mediascriptor's post, but to be honest I get the same impression from the thread's OP. Fruit of the poison tree concerns aside, it introduces the possibility that they're mimicking the OP's syntax. signed, Rosguill talk 21:52, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For additional verification you can run the last paragraphs of their reply from "I would like to express my sincerest" to "engaged with me during my time here" through a detector of your choice. gptzero.me, which seems to be popular for this application, returns 100% ai-generated.
I did not collapse based off of a detector, but my own judgement along with other technical tells. It was not just the obviously broken formatting. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 22:05, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

JoBlaq -2025

[edit]

@Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four: Please I want to know why you nominated the article JoBlaq for deletion. Did it fail notability? The article got reliable sources. And secondary sources too. 2RDD (talk) 21:46, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

From the deletion discussion: "All substantial mentions appear to be the type of unreliable promotional coverage cautioned against by WP:NEWSORGNIGERIA". fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 21:49, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
how is it promotional though? 2RDD (talk) 21:53, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you've read articles like [1][2][3] and not found them to be unreliable and promotional, then we simply see things differently. Others will weigh in at the AfD, possibly they will see things as you do as well. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 21:56, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four: I have created articles. If you check articles like Fanum, You will find sources of which you will think it's promotional. IShowSpeed and Kai Cenat. 2RDD (talk) 22:01, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I have stated my case, you disagree, that is fine. Please keep further deletion discussion to the relevant page and not on my talk page. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 22:13, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four: In this case, you failed NPPHOUR, please follow the recommended NPP practices. 2RDD (talk) 22:17, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This was not a new article, it is an article from 30 June. I draftified the article [4] citing the same concerns I've raised in the AfD. My concerns were not addressed when you moved it back into articlespace. Do not post on my talk page about this topic, broadly construed, again. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 22:34, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four: ohh, I see where the error is. It looks like promotional contents though. You are kinda right. 2RDD (talk) 22:56, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

InsanityClown1

[edit]

It feels like, because I am likely to be indeffed, InsanityClown is going open season on me... SPIs, AfDs, snarky comments on my talk page...

What the hell? pbp 22:37, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @pbp, my talk page is not an appropriate venue to discuss this, let's keep things to the ANI thread. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heads up on Islamophobic sock Prince of Roblox vandalism

[edit]

Hi there this user [5], and this user [6] are sock accounts of Prince of Roblox [7] they have very typical ways of editing always based on Islamophobic edits and highly anti-Pakistan and Pro India and Pro Hindu edits just report on the sock investigation page they are well known and admins block this vandal quickly and revert asap as they create dozens of accounts to edit again the articles need protection I think as they just come back as they have no life 90.213.219.215 (talk) 18:36, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[8], I wanted to wait until they had more than a single edit each. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 20:25, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]