User Talk:Ktkvtsh
Main | Talk | To Do | About | Photos | Watchlist |
This is Ktkvtsh's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5. |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Heusdens super coupe
[edit]Hi, I went into my article to update my references. In the article in my sandbox, I have 5 of them in there. But when I click to edit them because the location in the FAA website has changed there are NO references in there? Now I know why you declined my article the reference's are gone??? what happened to them? all five are gone? I will reinstall them.
I am also have trouble uploading photos to the article.
Thank you for your help
Mark Coupemanwi (talk) 01:50, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
- They were moved because you pressed submit sending it over to Articles for Creation. I apologize for this if you weren't prepared to submit them and it was too early.
- See more about uploading images here.
- See more about including images in your draft here. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:23, 15 September 2025 (UTC)
Asking for feedback based on a declined article
[edit]Hi User:Ktkvtsh, thanks for taking the time to review the submission Draft:Flowbox (software). I’m not asking for a re-review; I’ll resubmit to AfC after edits.
I’m stuck because the feedback I have recieved conflicts: some (like you) flagged a marketing tone, while others said the tone seems fine but the sources lack significant, independent coverage. If you have a moment for quick pointers, could you indicate: • specific lines or phrases that read promotional; and • any sources that fail or meet WP:SIGCOV / WP:ORG.
Or even advice on if it would be better to reduce the draft to a stub even if that may result in my most notable sources not being completely relevant or usable, I am a bit lost on what direction I should take to improve my article for resubmission
COI note: I’m connected to the subject and am seeking neutral pointers only before resubmitting. Thanks for your help. FactThread (talk) 07:58, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
- @FactThread, If you simply want to minimize the content to assist with chances of publication, remove the entirety of the history section. Everything there, except for who founded it, reads as promotional. Yes, the mergers could be included, but the way they are described reads like it's a press release from the company or a salesman telling a customer what's so great about the merger.
- Right now I see on the page 2014 and 2016 as when it was founded. Need to choose one or explain why they are different.
- Also, avoid WP:OVERKILL in referencing in the future. Having six sources for one sentence is too much.
- Hope this helps! Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:37, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Farhadhguran
[edit]Hello, and thank you for reviewing the draft. Yes, I am the subject of the article, and I would like to openly declare a conflict of interest (COI). I understand the importance of neutrality and reliable sourcing under WP:BLP, and I have tried to ensure that the draft does not contain promotional language. Each sentence is supported by an independent, reliable source. If there are still parts that appear promotional, I would greatly appreciate if you could please point them out so I can rephrase or provide stronger sources. My aim is to follow Wikipedia’s standards and to create a neutral, well-sourced article. Thank you for your time and guidance. Best regards,
Farguraan (talk) 06:52, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
- You need to do the WP:COI statement on your own page, not here on my talk page. I do see your account has been blocked. Leaving this message any way for information sake. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:38, 2 October 2025 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 3 October 2025 (UTC)