User talk:Morbidthoughts

Talk: Donald Trump lead sentence discussion

Hi Morbidthoughts,

I hope this message finds you well. I wanted to reach out about a consensus debate currently happening on Donald Trump’s page, as it mirrors a similar situation we encountered during Joe Biden’s presidency. Four years ago, we agreed on a consensus to keep the lead sentence format, which I believe was both fair and sensible. Specifically, the line for Joe Biden was: "...who has been the 46th and current president of the United States since 2021." Looking back, I see that you were in favor of maintaining this as the status quo. Talk:Joe Biden/Archive 15#RfC: Should we say he is "current" president in the lead, or not?

I believe we should apply this same structure to Donald Trump’s page, just as we did for Joe Biden and Barack Obama before him, to ensure consistency and clarity. This format clearly conveys the order ("47th"), incumbency ("current"), and start date ("since 2025"), which helps maintain uniformity across presidential biographies.

Given your involvement and knowledge of that earlier consensus, your insights would be incredibly valuable in the current discussion. It’s important that we uphold the same standards regardless of the officeholder, and I’d appreciate it if you could weigh in, share your thoughts, and cast a vote. Here is the current discussion and vote underway: Talk:Donald Trump, Superseding consensus #50, sentences 1 and 2

Thanks a lot, and I hope you’ll consider contributing. TimeToFixThis (talk) 11:35, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Minor thing

In case you didn't know, if you want to mention a category in a discussion, you can write it like so; [[:Category:Victims of rape]], turns into Category:Victims of rape. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:09, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Re: Mia Khalifa

Hey, I see you reverted my edit on Mia Khalifa saying that Tweet does not directly refer to military aid. You are right that this particular tweet doesn't refer to military aid but this is mentioned in that reference article uses for that military aid line and that's why i added that tweet there.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 13:49, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Citing to only the article is adequate then. Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:27, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

No problem.––kemel49^{(connect)(contri)} 19:08, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest in Regards to Zak Smith's Article

After looking at your contributions to Wikipedia, I see that you are a pornography photographer and subject matter expert. I am concerned this is an apparent COI in regards to editing that article, given your professional involvement with people that were witnesses in legal cases pertinent to that page. Cairnesteak (talk) 04:17, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

That's nice, Zak. Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:30, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Morbidthoughts. It seems to me, too, that due to your professional area, you have a conflict of interests regarding Zak Smith. Would you mind disclosing the COI, as per WP:COI policy? White Spider Shadow (talk) 20:18, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

I do not have a COI with Zak, and you should look up WP:OUTING on what you think is apparent. Morbidthoughts (talk) 21:26, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Certainly, I will look it up. White Spider Shadow (talk) 22:04, 3 September 2025 (UTC)

Deletion of my submission in case of Edward Kosner

What exactly is your problem dude? In your warning you insinuated i have some kind of problem with someone. That is absolutely not truth, i am neutral party just describing the facts of Edward Kosners case where he became victim of Streissand effect. You should be investigated because i followed all the wikipedia rules albeit i might have not had the perfect form. As a fellow wikieditor you should help me edit that FACT and not outright delete the whole mention of the controversy! 104.203.11.215 (talk) 19:09, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

You introduced original research in your last edit by writing about the controversy without reliable sources that directly describe the controversy. Further, you should review the article talk page on why his family background is not included. Morbidthoughts (talk) 19:27, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

So i've just read through that article and more and i am frankly shocked and disgusted of what wikipedia had become.

No more edits from me, i will never respect wikipedia anymore after reading the mental gymnastics people running this place can go to, abhorrent. I will ofc not edit wikipedia any longer, thank you for this deep dive 104.203.11.215 (talk) 03:10, 17 September 2025 (UTC)