Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/-kinesis (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unanimity that the page fails notability guidelines. Just Chilling (talk) 19:58, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

-kinesis

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Duplication of material already present at Wiktionary entry. I can find no evidence that the topic otherwise meets WP:GNG (i.e. the suffix -kinesis doesn't seem to be the subject of works I can find). I'd suggest deletion per WP:N and WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Ajpolino (talk) 19:54, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:06, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. While this article possibly has a potential to become a more fully developed list-class article like List of phobias, in practice I could find no significant non-dictionary sources describing the suffix. Without in-depth reliable sources, the article fails WP:GNG and I cannot see any good alternative to deletion at the moment. Hence, delete. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 21:16, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Most of the entries are unattested neologisms regarding superpowers that are nowhere near being notable as concepts – some (e.g. cocoakinesis) are just completely silly! The previous AfD reached no consensus, but most of the Keep arguments conflicted with WP:NOTDICT or asserted WP:ITSUSEFUL. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 21:19, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wikipedia is a not a rhyming dictionary. Bearian (talk) 18:18, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTDICT and perhaps also WP:INDISCRIMINATE. This is a list of unsourced, miscellaneous definitions without substantiative encyclopedic content, and most do not have standalone articles, also raising the question of which terms actually belong in such a list. Also, an extremely similar list exists at wikt:Category:English words suffixed with -kinesis (linked from the page linked by Ajpolino). ComplexRational (talk) 19:15, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.