Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Merge Tactics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Clash Royale#Merge Tactics. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 03:06, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Tactics

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable game mode of a notable game. There's a lot of uncited content, no reception and little in the way of decent sourcing, so I feel like this could easily be dealt with in the primary article. Let's Redirect or Merge to Clash Royale as an WP:ATD. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 02:45, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 02:45, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Clash Royale#Merge Tactics or Delete: Not notable on its own. Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 03:35, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Clash Royale#Merge Tactics. Obviously no SIGCOV of the topic separately, but the gamemodes could be discussed in different sections at the Clash Royale page. Katzrockso (talk) 03:45, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge (haha) to Clash Royale#Merge Tactics. Not notable in the realm of CR itself, let alone qualifying for WP:FICT. Bristledidiot (talk) 19:07, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is actually played by millions of people. And game mode itself is like a different game on it's own. It can be further updated by citing more sources and I do thing a large amount of Wikipedia page related topics are less popular than the game mode. Like many comic book characters and artists. Anyway, if it doesn't fit Wikipedia, it should be deleted. JsEnthusiast (talk) 20:46, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, we tend to not look at popularity so much as the state of sourcing for the subject matter, whether it is in the article or not, and whether that sourcing provides enough coverage to [[WP:|satisfy the general notability guideline]]. You are right a subtopic of a game isnt a direct argument something isn't notable, although it can be harder to prove that there is enough coverage separate from the primary topic to justify splitting the article. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 23:17, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and Merge to Clash Royale#Merge Tactics: While this article on its own is not substantial enough to stand by itelf, it can act as a good suppliment to the aforementioned section in "Clash Royale", as it seems to be missing its own weight of prose and citations. — Alex26337 (talk) 01:26, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, just for clarity, keeping and merging something are administratively two very different things - a vote for Keep means keeping the article, whereas Merge still deletes the article, but preserves its content somewhere else. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 21:02, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, got it. Thanks for letting me know. I'm still new to discussing AFDs, so I'll keep this in mind for future instances. — Alex26337 (talk) 22:26, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Clash Royale#Merge Tactics. Does not appear to be notable on its own as sources seem to always mention the game in conjunction with Clash Royale. I believe that Clash Royale#Merge Tactics is a good target as the section is currently just two sentences and is entirely unreferenced. – AllCatsAreGrey ^(talk) 19:57, 12 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.