Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoav Sarig

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Yoav Sarig

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) nableezy - 16:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, lack of secondary sources about the person, only indication of notability is a non-notable prize that I cannot even find actually exists (Namir Prize). Additionaly, COI issues possible with the creator and largest contributor having uploaded the picture used with the claim that he or she took the picture themselves, indicating a personal connection with the subject. Nableezy 14:43, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nableezy 14:43, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, lack of secondary sources about the person, only indication of notability is a non-notable prize that I cannot even find actually exists (Namir Prize). Additionaly, COI issues possible with the creator and largest contributor having uploaded the picture used with the claim that he or she took the picture themselves, indicating a personal connection with the subject. Nableezy 14:43, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nableezy 14:43, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article has numerous secondary sources (ASABE,Manila Bulletin, Washington times and more). The Namir prize is referenced here- https://www.agri.gov.il/he/pages/655.aspx?fbclid=IwAR2UkQrLF2NgjGMTHsRJYw-2lFgLvZd4EraDHobvqzO6OJnt1pBp-MUnK1s

And a simple search attests to its existance and notability: https://www.google.com/search?q=%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%A1+%D7%94%D7%A2%D7%91%D7%95%D7%93%D7%94+%D7%A2%22%D7%A9+%D7%A0%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%A8&oq=%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%A1+%D7%94%D7%A2%D7%91%D7%95%D7%93%D7%94+%D7%A2%22%D7%A9+%D7%A0%D7%9E%D7%99%D7%A8&aqs=chrome..69i57&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 That prize alone is sufficient, but it is not the only notable attribute. Sarig was elected ASABE fellow, which is "a member of unusual professional distinction with outstanding and extraordinary qualifications", and he has several other awards for inventions in agricultural machinery, also in the bio link above. Yes, I knew Ihim IRL,and took that photo, but knowing someone is not a conflict of interest, nor a reason for deletion. AgEng (talk) 15:25, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know he was dead? Since you write I know in the present tense. A bit curious this is your first edit in 9 years though. nableezy - 15:34, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

typo corrected, yes I know this. I don't edit wikipedia anymore, but read it often, and you pinged me that you are about to delete something I worked on for quite a bit back in the day. What does any of this have to do with this discussion? AgEng (talk) 15:53, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable academic for many reasons, not least being the highly selective and prestigious ASABE fellow. Free1Soul (talk) 15:29, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:56, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meet WP:GNG as sources in article show. Also meets WP:NACADEMIC criterion 2 as he won Namir and Asabe prizes --Shrike (talk) 06:19, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep by sources of article, passes WP:GNG.Brayan ocaner (talk) 11:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Couldnt find anything on Namir's significance previously, with that withdraw the nom. nableezy - 16:30, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.