Talk:Palacio de Cibeles

Spain Mid‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philately Low‑importance

	Philately portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philately, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of philately and stamp collecting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhilatelyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilatelyTemplate:WikiProject PhilatelyPhilately
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 6 April 2019. Further details are available here.

On 2 September 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved from Cybele Palace to Palacio de Cibeles. The result of the discussion was moved.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cybele Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121218024540/http://www.turismomadrid.es/en/component/guides/?view=monumento&id=13 to http://www.turismomadrid.es/en/component/guides/?view=monumento&id=13

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:48, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 February 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved as requested back to the title the article was at until last year, when it was moved by an account subsequently blocked as a sockpuppet. Dekimasuよ! 19:36, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cybele Palace (Madrid) → Cybele PalaceCybele Palace – This is the only place name in the world, and the proposed title also redirects here. 219.79.180.43 (talk) 14:45, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2 September 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Palacio de Cibeles. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (non-admin closure) veko. (user | talk | contribs) he/him 17:19, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Cybele Palace → Cibeles PalaceCibeles Palace – Cibeles is the proper name in Spanish and is alse used in the English language article. LeRenartQuiPense (talk) 07:33, 2 September 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 13:33, 9 September 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Tenshi! (Talk page) 17:09, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Palacio de Cibeles. Ngrams suggest that this has been the most common name in English-language sources since 2015, when it overtook Palacio de Comunicaciones. While the usage for Palacio de Comunicaciones at its peak was higher than Palacio de Cibeles has yet achieved, there are other buildings called Palacio de Comunicaciones in Valencia and La Paz which may account for some of those results. Ham II (talk) 07:00, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: Thoughts on the alternatively proposed location? Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 13:33, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Palacio de Cibeles per Ham II. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:54, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.