User talk:2600:4808:4892:7600:A367:3D03:5E9D:DCAF

August 2025

Hello, I'm TonySt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Robert M. La Follette have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. tony 01:43, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am doing something constructive. I am giving accurate information. I am using positive language. 2600:4808:4892:7600:A367:3D03:5E9D:DCAF (talk) 01:44, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 2600:4808:4892:7600:A367:3D03:5E9D:DCAF! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Robert M. La Follette several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Robert M. La Follette, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. tony 01:43, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know. Please let me keep the version that honors him. I just think he's my favorite politician, and deserves a more positive contribution. 2600:4808:4892:7600:A367:3D03:5E9D:DCAF (talk) 01:45, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, Tony St. Can you be kind enough to let me edit the way I want it. I would really appreciate it. 2600:4808:4892:7600:A367:3D03:5E9D:DCAF (talk) 01:47, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Consider opening a discussion on the article's talk page to find consensus with other editors. Reverting to your preferred version several times violates our edit warring policy, and it can eventually lead to a loss of editing privileges. Take care --tony 01:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But I think this version is more accurate and honors his legacy. Can you please let my version be. I am asking very nicely. I won't edit war if you listen to my polite request. 2600:4808:4892:7600:A367:3D03:5E9D:DCAF (talk) 01:56, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe your version is more accurate, please explain your reasoning on the talk page so it can be discussed. Until there’s agreement, your edits will continue to be reverted. 20m00 🗩 02:15, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:2600:4808:4892:7600:A367:3D03:5E9D:DCAF reported by User:TonySt (Result: ). Thank you. tony 01:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know I have edit warred. I'm so sorry, and I sincerely apologize for the chaos. Here's a compromise. If you don't revert my changes, I will not edit war. Deal. 2600:4808:4892:7600:A367:3D03:5E9D:DCAF (talk) 02:00, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Madison, Wisconsin, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 03:25, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:32, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No fair. Unblock me. I made a deal. 2600:4808:4892:7600:A367:3D03:5E9D:DCAF (talk) 02:44, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you block me, we made a deal. 2600:4808:4892:7600:A367:3D03:5E9D:DCAF (talk) 02:45, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was blocked because everyone said I edit warred. I was making a right change, and really wanted it my why. I made a deal, but people kept reverting it and one blocked me. 2600:4808:4892:7600:A367:3D03:5E9D:DCAF (talk) 02:51, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2600:4808:4892:7600:A367:3D03:5E9D:DCAF (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made a deal with Tony St, that if I keep the edit they way I preferred it, then I won't edit war and won't be blocked. But then other users reverted my edits, I explained the deal with him, and this person blocked me and put it back, even though I kept the promise

Decline reason:

"Keep my version and I won't edit war" is not a useful stance on Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 03:34, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. 2600:4808:4892:7600:A367:3D03:5E9D:DCAF

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.