Jump to content

User talk:Pigsonthewing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bottom of Page

Talk to me, Andy Mabbett

[edit]
  • If you post a message on this page, I'll reply on this page to avoid fragmenting the discussion.
  • If I've left you a message on your talk page, I will be watching it, so please reply there rather than here (but do feel free to drop a copy of {{Talkback}} here).
  • If appropriate, I will move discussion from here to the relevant article's talk page, so that anyone interested can join in.
  • If you want to start a new discussion thread, please start it at the bottom of the page. Better still, use the "new section" tab next to the "edit this page" tab, or the link at the foot of this section, either of which will do that automatically.
  • Please do not make links from within section headings.
  • Inaccessible HTML (coloured text, "small" tags, etc.) will be removed from this page on sight. Broken heading or list structures will be fixed.
  • Please sign and date your entries by inserting four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Start a new discussion.



September thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in September! - Today is the birthday of the 16th Thomaskantor after Bach, remembered. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:40, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My 100th biography to the Main page in 2025 is Siegmund Nimsgern. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:40, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First entry - question about referenced

[edit]

I'm writing my first entry (draft:Shane Appell). I have two questions about the referenced section: 1. How can I delete references? I inadvertently wrote the same reference twice and would like to delete redundancies. 2. There were instances when I didn't use "cite" after the text I wanted to add a reference to but rather added a reference without attaching it to a text. Is there any way to connect the reference to the text after which the citation will appear? תמי ניניו (talk) 18:11, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to your question at The Teahouse. It's best to keep such discussions in one place, not least so that others can follow along or join in. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:16, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft mix-up needs correction - wrong version moved to Draft:Anil Bahuman

[edit]

Hello,

I need help resolving a draft mix-up that occurred during recent page moves. Here's the situation:

Background:

  • I submitted an AfC draft at User:Bahuman/AnilBahuman
  • A colleague had separately created Draft:Anil Bahuman (on my request, but posted it without my knowledge assuming it was only a local draft that can be finalized later)
  • Both drafts were about the same person (me)

The Problem: When someone from Teahouse helped move drafts to correct namespaces, my colleague's draft (the older, less complete version) ended up at the main location Draft:Anil Bahuman, while my more comprehensive, properly sourced version appears to have been lost or overwritten.

Current Status:

  • Draft:Anil Bahuman now contains my colleague's outdated version
  • My updated version with better sourcing and proper Wikipedia formatting is no longer accessible
  • This creates a problem for AfC review since the wrong version is at the primary location

Request: Could you help restore my version to Draft:Anil Bahuman? My version had:

  • More comprehensive sourcing from independent sources
  • Proper Wikipedia formatting and structure
  • Detailed reviewer notes on the talk page
  • Better compliance with WP:BLP and WP:V

I can provide the full text of my version if needed, or if there's a way to recover it from edit histories.

This was an honest mix-up during the namespace correction process, and I want to ensure the correct version gets reviewed by AfC.

Thank you for your assistance.

Bahuman (talk) 19:31, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've marked the earlier draft for deletion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:34, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you - I will update on my end. Bahuman (talk) 20:06, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #698

[edit]

Tech News: 2025-39

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:52, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse archive

[edit]

Hi,

What was the point of archiving this? Sure, it was likely just someone partly trolling but otherwise was a fair question to ask. It might have also invited a couple thought-provoking responses from other Wikipedians/Teahouse hosts.

Not really a good look to archive an inquiry this fast. It only enables them to doubt and throw shade at Wikipedia more, not less. Dissoxciate (talk) 16:14, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't a request for help, and it didn't assume good faith. Had it not been The Teahouse, the accusation about other editors would probably have been blockable.
See also WP:NOTAFORUM. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:26, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 233, September 2025

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:54, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Infamy

[edit]

(They've all got it infamy.) Is this surreal, or is it me that's going nuts? -- Hoary (talk) 22:02, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:25, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #699

[edit]

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10, Nos. 326, 327, 350, 351, 352
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.


Online events:

Announcements:

Tip of the Month:

  • Notable does not always mean admirable; you don't have to like an article's subject to make the article a useful contribution to Wikipedia.

Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever.
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 6,283 articles during this period:

  • 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
  • 24 September 2025: 20.20% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,088,533 biographies; 421,901 women)

Other ways to participate:

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:32, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Tech News: 2025-40

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:48, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2025 Issue 18

[edit]


MediaWiki message delivery 16:26, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 October 2025

[edit]
This time "not merely negative".
Wickedpedia wrangles post-truth politics.
Unexpected news!
Fifty hot topics from fourteen noticeboards.
Policy, politics, icons, captchas, and LLMs.
And other recent publications.
When to walk away.
Rest in peace.
Celebrities, deaths and software.
All invited!

This Month in Education: September 2025

[edit]

Moving talk page discussions

[edit]

Hello, Andy. How are you? Being your long-time admirer, I thought I'll go through your talk page, and I came across this:

If appropriate, I will move discussion from here to the relevant article's talk page, so that anyone interested can join in.

I wanted to ask if there's a guideline regarding this? I wanted to move a topic from a user's talk page to an article's talk page, so that it will be convenient to report to WP:DR if needed. I wanted to know if that's allowed since it's not my talk page but I had created that topic.. Kingsacrificer (talk) 13:42, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If it's not your talk page, you shouldn't do it (at least: not without asking first). Just put a pointer to it, from the article's talk page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:44, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers! Kingsacrificer (talk) 14:51, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]