User talk:Warofdreams

Archives
Warofdreams/2003 Warofdreams/2004/01-06 Warofdreams/2004/07-12 Warofdreams/2005/01-06 Warofdreams/2005/07-12 Warofdreams/2006/01-06 Warofdreams/2006/07-12 Warofdreams/2007/01-03 Warofdreams/2007/04-06 Warofdreams/2007/07-09 Warofdreams/2007/10-12 Warofdreams/2008/01-03 Warofdreams/2008/04-06 Warofdreams/2008/07-09 Warofdreams/2008/10-12 Warofdreams/2009/01-03 Warofdreams/2009/04-06 Warofdreams/2009/07-09 Warofdreams/2009/10-12 Warofdreams/2010 Warofdreams/2011 Warofdreams/2012 Warofdreams/2013 Warofdreams/2014 Warofdreams/2015 Warofdreams/2016 Warofdreams/2017 Warofdreams/2018 Warofdreams/2019 Warofdreams/2020 Warofdreams/2021 Warofdreams/2022 Warofdreams/2023 Warofdreams/2024 Warofdreams/Party candidate records

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Very impressed with your prolific work at the 20,000 Challenge! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:16, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's very kind, many thanks! Warofdreams talk 23:04, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hellifield Peel Castle

Hi Warofdreams. Thanks for creating Hellifield Peel Castle. Apart from the Grand Designs sources, everyone else seems to call it Hellifield Peel. I wonder if they added “castle” in case their audience didn’t recognise the word “peel”. A peel isn’t a castle, and vice versa. Would you have any objection to me (or you) renaming it? --Northernhenge (talk) 15:26, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Northernhenge no objections at all, to be honest I can't remember why I picked that title in the first place and the rename makes perfect sense. Warofdreams talk 15:51, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Page moved! --Northernhenge (talk) 16:42, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for all of the articles showing the amazing places and buildings in North Yorkshire! Cardofk (talk) 19:19, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's very kind, thank you! Warofdreams talk 21:30, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RDWC

Hey! Hope you are doing well. I saw you reverted that change to the name of the RDWC article. Looks like the talk page still needs to be reverted too when you have a chance. That editor appeared out of nowhere and has been barreling through, they deleted the talk page notice I shared. Echoedmyron (talk) 22:16, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm good, thanks, hope you are too! I hadn't spotted that I hadn't moved the talk page, thanks for letting me know, I've now fixed that. I'm hoping that the editor was acting in good faith and just incorrectly assumed it should have be a counterpart to the Men's Roller Derby World Cup article, shame they didn't discuss first. It does remind me that at some point I should write an article on the JRDA World Cup, should be plenty of sources now. Warofdreams talk 22:28, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Public Services, Transport and Traffic Union logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Public Services, Transport and Traffic Union logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UK by-election records article

Hey. I'm copy and pasting this message to regular editors of the UK by-election records article, more in slight bemused shock than anything else. I've just recieved a brand new, freshly published book from Iain Dale, "British by-elections 1769-2025". His preface and the reference tables are blatant lifts and copies of the by-election records article. It's clearly an obvious lift! We could retcon the citations it's that obvious! Must have made the right impression with all the hard work we put into the page. Speak soon doktorb _words^deeds 22:07, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's nice to see that the information is proving useful but a shame it's not been referenced as a source! Looking at Dale's lengthy bibliography, perhaps it's unsurprising that he isn't fully researching this himself. Will just have to ensure that nobody uses Dale's book as a reference for our article. Warofdreams talk 23:24, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10, Nos. 326, 327, 350, 351, 352
Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes.

Online events:

New: Alphabet run S & T | Women in STEM | Halloween
Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music

Announcements:

Sister wikiproject Women in Green October 2025 Good Article Edit-a-thon focuses on What Women Do

Tip of the Month:

Notable does not always mean admirable; you don't have to like an article's subject to make the article a useful contribution to Wikipedia.

Progress ("moving the needle"): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever.
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 6,283 articles during this period:

19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women)
24 September 2025: 20.20% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,088,533 biographies; 421,901 women)

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:33, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]