Talk:You're My Best Friend (Queen song)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the You're My Best Friend (Queen song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Deletion
[edit]Why on earth should this article be deleted?!? --feline1 15:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Obviously a mistake or prank. Somebody remove the notice. --70.188.134.238 22:09, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
time dilation
[edit]Brian May says that in '39 a man comes back 100 years later to find his daughter still alive. How is this possible, if most people don't live for a century. Even in the future, this seems a bit unlikely. Perhaps he finds his grandaughter and sees that she has his daughter's eyes? Or did the writer of the song just make a mistake?
A couple of explanations - the entire story takes place in the future, so maybe by that time people will have mastered the art of longevity.
Second, the song says "Your mother's eyes, from your eyes, cry to me". Your explanation above could fit, or it could be the man's wife/girlfriend gave up and found someone else years later (thus, a daughter that would be less than 100 years old). 70.176.186.10 30 June 2005 20:01 (UTC)
- And you're assuming it's a literal "your mother." It could just as easily be a figurative sense, as in "your foremothers"- that is, she's a female descendent of his wife. Taken that way, it could be a grandaughter, a great grandaughter, a great-great grandaughter, whatever. It could, in fact, be hundreds of generations later- all we know is that it's been in one or more increments of a hundred years since they left- in a '39, in other words.--Deridolus 23:55, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
- May is referring to the "time dilation effect" which Einstein's theory of special relativity predicts will happen if you travel close to the speed of light. Time passess more slowly for the man in the spaceship than for his folks back on earth. May studied astronomy at post-graduate level, so he would have been familiar with the concept.--feline1 15:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Roger's High Notes
[edit]On "A Night At the Opera", Roger is singing that high B flat falsetto in '39. This doesn't seem unreasonable, as he sings the very same note elsewhere on the album (Bohemian Rhapsody)... it would seem to be his "top note" - he never goes above it to my knowledge (eg My Fairy King, In the Lap of the Gods, Seven Seas of Rhye.... these have top A, one semitone lower) This being the case, one wonders why he would "refuse" to sing the note in '39, but not Bohemian Rhapsody! Nonetheless, on "Live Killers", that version of '39 is indeed pitched one semitone down from the album version.... and there are numerous bootlegs where Taylor fails woefully to reach even that A note during the late 70s...
Cut off?
[edit]- John Deacon: Well, Freddie didn’t like the electric piano, so I took it home and I started to learn on the electric piano and basically that’s the song that came out you know when I was learning to play piano. It was written on that instrument and it sounds best on that. You know, often on the instrument that you wrote the song on
Is this a misquote or does it really end like this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.56.143.227 (talk) 00:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC).
John Deacon
[edit]The article alledges that John Deacon sang backing vocals on the record, but I've looked that up on Google and found out that he never sang on a record. Am I wrong or am I right? Did he sing backing vocals on that one record? Someone tell me, it's got me really confused. Cheers, TopGearFreak (talk) 15:57, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
It's true, Deacon never sang on any records. He only sang backing vocals live for some songs (Like Radio GaGa for example) Bart-16 (talk) 06:07, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
The Composition Section.
[edit]It's grammatic garbage and wreaks of everything but neutrality. "a really passionate performance?" And since when were phrases like "a lot of" wikipedia-worthy? And the parentheticals. They're a good half of the section. Most of them aren't even necessary, nevermind accurate. While C major has all the same notes as A minor, the two are relative keys, not one in the same. The song is clearly in C major as it resolves on C major. I have no idea what 12/8 is going in there. And to whom does the pronoun "his" refer? Could it perhaps be replaced with "the band's"? I'm sorry if I sound a tad ranty but this simply must be changed. No excuses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Strangebrownbag (talk • contribs) 22:03, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on You're My Best Friend (Queen song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111117120047/http://www.queensongs.info:80/the-book/songwriting-analyses/no-synth-era/a-night-at-the-opera/youre-my-best-friend.html to http://www.queensongs.info/the-book/songwriting-analyses/no-synth-era/a-night-at-the-opera/youre-my-best-friend.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on You're My Best Friend (Queen song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402172606/http://50.6.195.142/archives/70s_files/19760731.html to http://50.6.195.142/archives/70s_files/19760731.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160602084720/http://australian-charts.com/forum.asp?todo=viewthread&id=35092 to http://australian-charts.com/forum.asp?todo=viewthread&id=35092
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Twee pop
[edit]Claiming that a song belongs to a genre when it was released nearly a decade prior to said genre's documented origin—in contradiction of Wikipedia's own article about the genre—creates an anachronism that to me clearly qualifies as an WP:EXCEPTIONAL claim requiring additional sources. In particular, it is both a "[s]urprising or apparently important clai[m]"
and one "contradicted by the prevailing view within the relevant community"
. (For full disclosure, I have no substantial editing history on the twee pop article.)
Chronological inconsistency aside, the actual source for this claim—a listicle describing "You're My Best Friend" as "a slightly twee pop song"—is a very weak basis for genre attribution. Even if the line is inferred to mean that "YMBF" is slightly within the genre of twee pop and not a pop song that is slightly twee, that would still leave us with a decidedly tepid, unemphatic statement to hinge the entire claim on. Per WP:EXPLICITGENRES, sources used to support genre classifications must use direct language. I understand that the parent page is an essay, but this represents a practical and commonsense approach to sourcing that is certainly applicable here.
In short, twee pop is named as a genre based on a listicle that, at best, tenuously describes the song as being "slightly" of a style that would not exist for nine years. I hope my reasons for removing it are understandable. LifeofTau 15:33, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- I agree. I think they're saying that it's a pop song that is somewhat twee. OTOH, I think it's a long way from being an exceptional claim.Doctorhawkes (talk) 02:07, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
Requested move 28 September 2025
[edit]
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that You're My Best Friend (Queen song) be renamed and moved to You're My Best Friend . A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
You're My Best Friend (Queen song) → You're My Best Friend – Recently, Station1 moved the dabpage and retargeted the base title here as they believe that the Queen song is the primary topic, and now we have a malplaced redirect. If the Queen song is the primary topic (which I have no opinion on), then this page should be moved to the base title. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 13:43, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- Support. This is a clear primary topic. Pageviews here. — BarrelProof (talk) 02:52, 29 September 2025 (UTC)
- Support. This is the primary topic, and there is no reason to keep the unnecessary disambiguation. 162 etc. (talk) 06:30, 29 September 2025 (UTC)