Jump to content

User talk:Frankserafini87

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


February 2024

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nouvelle cuisine have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:05, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of sauces

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of sauces, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:54, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, Frankserafini87. Thank you for your work on Batsoà. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for adding this new article. As ever, there's always the option of merging such short stubs into a broader article, like pig's trotter, but for now perhaps we can see how it expands over time!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 21:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Piedmontese cuisine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amaretti. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi Frankserafini87. Thank you for your work on Tarte à l'badrée. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for checking! Frankserafini87 (talk) 15:43, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions about your contributions at MP Materials

[edit]

Hi Frankserafini87, Thanks for your work on the MP Materials page! I work for the company, so I can’t edit the page due to my conflict of interest. I think the accuracy of what you did can be improved, so I left some suggestions for your review. I hope you’ll consider them. I left all the details on the Talk page at Talk:MP Materials#Suggestions for editor Thanks for taking a look and for contributing to the page! Tmy350 (talk) 16:24, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Frankserafini87. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eduardo Viscasillas Blanque, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Frankserafini87. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Eduardo Viscasillas Blanque".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Frankserafini87. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joaquín Agustín Burset Masferrer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mainstream bias moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Mainstream bias. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the page. I will revise the entry and resubmit for publishing when it's ready. Frankserafini87 (talk) 00:29, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How Countries Go Broke moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to How Countries Go Broke. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Fails WP:NBOOKS also see WP:BKCRYSTAL. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Taabii (talk) 05:56, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Taabii. I will revise the entry and resubmit for publishing when it's ready. Frankserafini87 (talk) 00:29, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave descriptive edit summaries that explain your edits

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Talk:Sound of Freedom (film) did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. I have changed some of the WikiProjects you added with your edits because I didn't think they were relevant and didn't understand why you added them, because you didn't provide an edit summary to explain why you added them. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 07:59, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cameron,
Thanks for the reminder. I will remember to include a summary of my edits. Frankserafini87 (talk) 00:15, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mainstream bias

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Frankserafini87. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mainstream bias, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mainstream bias

[edit]

Hello, Frankserafini87. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mainstream bias".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:00, 7 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: How Countries Go Broke (September 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LEvalyn was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Books need at least two published book reviews (in newspapers/magazines) to have a wikipedia article. Please locate some and ideally use them to add a "Reception" section.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:59, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Frankserafini87! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 07:59, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]