Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nominating featured lists in Wikipedia

This star, with one point broken, symbolizes the featured candidates on Wikipedia.

Welcome to featured list candidates! Here, we determine which lists are of a good enough quality to be featured lists (FLs). Featured lists exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and must satisfy the featured list criteria.

Before nominating a list, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at peer review. This process is not a substitute for peer review. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the featured list candidate (FLC) process. Those who are not significant contributors to the list should consult regular editors of the list before nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly.

A list should not be listed at featured list candidates and another review process at the same time. Nominators who have previously successfully nominated a list may have two concurrent featured list nominations only if the first active nomination has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed.

The featured list director, Giants2008, or his delegates, PresN and Hey man im josh, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. Each nomination will typically last at least twenty days, but may last longer if changes are ongoing or insufficient discussion or analysis has occurred. For a nomination to be promoted to FL status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. The directors determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list and archived if, in the judgment of the director who considers a nomination and its reviews:

  • actionable objections have not been resolved in a timely manner; or
  • consensus for promotion has not been reached after significant time; or
  • reviewers are unable to judge whether the criteria have been met.

It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the process focuses on finding and resolving problems in relation to the criteria, rather than asserting the positives. Declarations of support are not as important as finding and resolving issues, and the process is not simply vote-counting.

Once the director or a delegate has decided to close a nomination, they will do so on the nominations page. A bot will update the list talk page after the list is promoted or the nomination archived, typically within the day, and the {{FLC}} template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates or adds the {{Article history}} template. If a nomination is archived, the nominator should take adequate time to resolve issues before re-nominating.

Purge the cache to refresh this page – Table of contents – Closing instructions

Shortcut

Featured content:

Featured list tools:

Nominations urgently needing reviews

The following lists were nominated almost 2 months ago and have had their review time extended because objections are still being addressed, the nomination has not received enough reviews, or insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met. If you have not yet reviewed them, please take the time to do so:

Source reviews needed

The following lists were nominated for removal more than 14 days ago:

Nominations

[edit]

77th Primetime Emmy Awards

[edit]
Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk and RunningTiger123 09:57, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We are nominating the 2025 Primetime Emmys because we believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I followed how the 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024 were written and structured. Note: RunningTiger123 is also listed as a co-nominator since he made considerable and significant contributions to this list. Birdienest81talk 09:57, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Royal Navy flag officers who died during the First World War

[edit]
Nominator(s): Dumelow (talk) 06:05, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is my first FLC nomination but I believe it meets all the required criteria. This was written in conjunction with Pickersgill-Cunliffe who is unfortunately on a wikibreak due to illness but I will endeavour to address any and all comments - Dumelow (talk) 06:05, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

[edit]
  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
  • All images need alt text.
  • See MOS:THISISALIST and fix the first sentence of the lead. (please Reply to icon mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:11, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi MPGuy2824, thanks for the pointers. I think I have actioned them all. As I say, I am not overly familiar with featured lists so would welcome any feedback - Dumelow (talk) 06:46, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • You haven't added the table captions. See the first point above.
I've had a go at adding them, can you check it's worked?
  • The image cell isn't the primary cell of a row. I would say that the name cell should be made the header cell for all the rows.
I'm sorry, I don't know what this means. Do you mean move the image to a different column or just move the !scope=row code to the name cell?
The latter -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:43, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've done this, it's highlighted all the name column in bold and shading, is that how it's meant to work or have I cocked it up? - Dumelow (talk) 08:47, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • For the lead image, don't use a fixed pixel size. See MOS:UPRIGHT.
Now specified as a thumb
  • You can remove the hard coded background color for the header row. It seems to be ignored anyway.
Removed
  • Richard James Tench - one of the sources says that he retired in 1908, without any mention of service during WW1.
I'm using, as the basis for inclusion, any flag officer listed by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission, an organisation whose role it is to record British and Commonwealth deaths in the two world wars. I am cautious that moving away from their list would take us into the realms of original research - Dumelow (talk) 13:15, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:15, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Harley

[edit]
  • Using the CWGC as the basis of the list is questionable. For example, Sir George Warrender died over a month after retiring from the Navy and verifiably wasn't employed at the time of his death. While researching this little review I saw that it claims that Charles Le Mesurier was a Commodore, 2nd Class when he died, despite the fact he had been relieved of command months earlier and reverted to being a Captain.
As above, the CWGC is an organisation whose role is to record those that died during the two world wars. I am cautious that deleting entries because we don't think they were active at the time constitutes original research. The article states that listing by the CWGC is the requirement for inclusion
  • "In British wartime prime minister David Lloyd George's 1933 memoirs he lauds the admirals for serving at sea and sharing the risk of death with their men. He contrasts this with the service of British generals in the war whom he generalises as châteaux generals who did not visit the battlefield. This myth is unfair on the generals who suffered heavy casualties during the war, with many killed in action. Three British admirals were killed in action during the war compared to at least 78 British generals with the rate of death proportionately greater in the army." By my admittedly quick count from Bloody Red Tabs 64 of these were Brigadier-Generals, which was equivalent to Commodores First and Second Class in the Navy: this rank was not counted as flag officer under the regulations then in force.[1] Quite frankly the whole quoted section should be deleted.
I have trimmed this out, as you suggest it is not quite comparing apples with apples
  • "The rank of admiral of the fleet was held for life and was granted to the most senior serving naval officers or as an honorary rank for prior service." Heathcote is wrong: the rank was given to the most senior qualified officer: before 1914 Admirals of the Fleet "selected by His Majesty from the Admirals on the active list who have served as Commander-in-Chief or who have commanded at sea as Flag Officer for two years".[2] Before the war it was still possible for officers to reach the rank of Admiral with less than two years service afloat as a flag officer (for example John Denison).
Thanks, do you have a suggested phrasing and replacement source?
  • 'In August 1914 there were 18 serving rear-admirals, 22 vice-admirals, 12 admirals (plus 2 honorary appointments), and 3 admirals of the fleet (plus the monarch George V and 3 honorary appointments).' The Navy List was corrected to 18 July, so August isn't correct. There were 58 rear-admirals, not 18.
Corrected to July and the typo on 58.
  • Since the above section was included, why not a mention of senior Engineer officers? It is worth pointing out that the Navy of the day was very specific about what was considered a "flag officer", and even Engineer Rear-Admirals and above were not counted as such.
Good point, I have added a mention of how many were serving in July 1914. I also think this article would be better at "...Royal Navy admirals...", as Pickersgill-Cunliffe suggested on the talk page a couple of years ago; otherwise, as you say, engineer officers should be omitted. Do you have any thoughts on this? - Dumelow (talk) 13:32, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly more remarks later. —Simon Harley (Talk). 11:16, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ The King's Regulations and Admiralty Instructions. p. 52, 58–59.
  2. ^ The King's Regulations and Admiralty Instructions. p. 71.

Drive-by comment

[edit]
  • "During this period....." - what period? You haven't specified a period. Even if you consider that the title counts (which I would say it doesn't) you are assuming that every reader knows when the First World War happened..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:42, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
When I deleted the name of the article it removed the context. I have replaced "this period" with "the First World War" - Dumelow (talk) 08:50, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

More comments

[edit]
  • Ranks linked in the lead (rear admiral, etc) should also be linked on first use in the body
  • "In 1914 Royal Navy practice was for rear-admirals to lead divisions of 2-4 battleships, they also commanded squadrons of battlecruisers" - comma should be a semi-colon
  • "Many admirals also held staff positions on land rather than sea-going commands" => "Many admirals held staff positions on land rather than sea-going commands" - the use of "also" suggests that these admirals held posts both at land and sea, which I don't believe is what you mean
  • "The only non Royal Navy admiral" => "The only non-Royal Navy admiral"
  • "This list includes all officers noted by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC) as holding flag officer rank and who died" => "This list includes all officers noted by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC) as holding flag officer rank who died"
  • "Some senior captains were appointed to the role of commodore to command a formation of ships, it did not become a formal rank until 1997" - comma should be a semi-colon -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:31, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Billboard Adult Contemporary number ones of 2000

[edit]
Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here's my 40th AC number ones list for your delectation. This particular year was mainly about Savage Garden and Faith Hill, but in addition none other than Gwyneth Paltrow had a number one. Feedback as ever will be most gratefully received and swiftly acted upon -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:45, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Bgsu98

[edit]
  • No issues with the prose.
  • Table appears to be formatted properly.

Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:14, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of dasyproctids

[edit]
Nominator(s): PresN 19:46, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey everyone, mammal list #61 in our perpetual series and rodent list #6: Dasyproctidae. We continue here covering the Caviomorpha parvorder, aka "things shaped kinda like guinea pigs", with the agoutis, which look like lanky guinea pigs. So that checks out. 21 species, mostly in South America, and for once almost everything has a picture and a range map. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 19:46, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Seattle Seawolves seasons

[edit]
Nominator(s): SounderBruce 23:14, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Seattle Seawolves are a successful rugby union team who finished their eighth season this year, making them finally eligible for a nomination. This is the seventh in my series of lists about Seattle's major league sports teams and their seasons, and fashioned similar to them due to the lack of suitable rugby equivalents at FL. As such, I'm highly amenable to major changes. SounderBruce 23:14, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • Lead image could probably be made larger
  • "The team is a member [singular] of the Western Conference and play their [plural] home matches" - I know that there is a lot of ambiguity around whether a sports team is singular or plural (in both US and UK English) but this reads particularly jarringly - is there any way to avoid it?
    • Swapped in "Seawolves" for "the team".
  • "Western Conference leaders Austin Gilgronis and the LA Giltinis" - is it correct that you only put "the" before one team name but not the other?
    • Fixed.
  • "The remainder of the season, including the playoffs, were cancelled" => "The remainder of the season, including the playoffs, was cancelled" (subject of the sentence is "remainder", which is singular)
    • Fixed.
  • That's it, I think! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:28, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:26, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Drive-by comments

List of Intangible Cultural Heritage elements in Ukraine

[edit]
Nominator(s): Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 16:25, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've been updating this list for a couple of years, so I figured it should be my first individual FL nomination. As far as I know, this is the first Intangible Cultural Heritage list to be nominated as well. I have been adding descriptions to each element and greatly improving the list for several months, and now I believe it is complete and meets the FL criteria. The review process will probably take a while as this is a rather long list, but any suggestions and improvements are welcome. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 16:25, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very brief comments but could you add to what the national register and Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity do. I am thinking of descriptions similar to those in the WHS lists. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 12:36, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean exactly. Similarly to the WHS lists, the lead defines Intangible Cultural Heritage, and then the following paragraph mentions that the National Register safeguards these elements on the national level. Do you want me to expand these descriptions or were you thinking of something else? Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 16:33, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Do items have to be inscribed on the national register to be recognized by UNESCO, and what specific criteria (LIke "UNESCO lists sites under ten criteria; each entry must meet at least one of the criteria. Criteria i through vi are cultural, and vii through x are natural" from Ukranian whs list) are there to being inscribed on each of the lists? 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 03:16, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"The Ministry of Culture of Ukraine has also formed the National Register ... which is required by the Convention for the further nomination of these elements to the UNESCO lists" – so inscription on the National Register precedes the nomination to the UNESCO lists. ICH elements don't have to meet one or more criteria from a certain list to be inscribed, unlike World Heritage Sites. Instead they have much more rigid sets of criteria, which in my opinion are self-explanatory (e.g., for the Urgent Safeguarding List, an element must fit the definition of ICH, must be endangered, the country must attempt to safeguard it, it should be practiced within the nominating country, etc). I can add these in a footnote if you think it's necessary to include this info, though I think it's somewhat redundant. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 06:07, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

[edit]

Dantheanimator

[edit]

Great seeing this nominated and congrats Shwabb on your first FLN! :) Adding in a few small things I noticed but will try to do a fuller review when I have time and maybe help with the source review too

  • "Three items – Embroidery technique 'white-in-white' of the town Reshetylivka in Poltava region, Rivne region tradition of the Polissia Dudka-Vykrutka, and Safeguarding practice of the "Tradition of the Generous Evening in Ukraine" through formal and non-formal education – were nominated for inclusion on the UNESCO lists in 2026."--> "Three items were nominated for inclusion on the UNESCO Lists in 2026: the 'white-on-white' embroidery technique from Reshetylivka in the Poltava region; the Dudka-Vykrutka tradition of Polissia in the Rivne region; and the safeguarding practice of the 'Tradition of the Generous Evening in Ukraine' through formal and non-formal education." (recommendation from ChatGPT, which I also think flows better)
  • Done (though I did not re-word the names of the nominated items since they're on the UNESCO website and will probably stay the same if these items go through to the UNESCO Lists next year)
  • "In addition, one hundred fifteen items are inscribed on the National Register of Elements of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Ukraine." --> Maybe this can be simplified to "In addition, one hundred fifteen items are inscribed on Ukraine's National Register."
  • Done
  • "Although all regions of Ukraine are represented in the Register through" --> Does this Register refer to the National Register of UNESCO's register (assuming it's the national one but might be good to add National/UNESCO for clarity)
  • UNESCO manages three Lists, while the state controls the Register that consits of five Inventories. I can see how this can be confusing since all these terms are similar, so this is fixed.
  • Maybe retitle the "Media" columns to "Photo" for consistency with other lists? (all the rows looked like they had either Photos or were empty so it would also be more precise)
  • There is one video (Cossack's songs on the UNESCO list), and I initially expected to find more videos (especially for other song and dance-related items) so I titled the columns "Media". I did find a video of the singing tradition of Luka but the YouTube video uploading tool did not let me upload it to Wikimedia Commons (perhaps because of this screenshot from the video that is already linked to it, which is what I used in the end). If you believe that the Cossack's songs video is out of place, I can replace it with an image and retitle the columns to "Photo" for consistency.

Dan the Animator 01:29, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. I replied to all the comments above, have a look whenever you have time and feel free to leave any comments on the list itself. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 08:49, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Billboard Adult Contemporary number ones of 1999

[edit]
Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:53, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here's my 39th nomination of a list of AC number ones. Please gloss over the fact that the first number one of the year featured a horrible horrible man, and focus on the achievements of a little balding man from England and two ladies from Canada..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:53, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Bgsu98 (9/27/25)

[edit]
  • You spell out some numbers over 10 and render others in numerals. Regardless of WP policy, I'd just pick one to be consistent. Personally, I prefer spelled-out numbers.
  • I would use the phrase "the Backstreet Boys".
  • "The song was not at the time available..." reads a little awkwardly. I would recommend "At the time, the song was not available..." or "The song was, at the time, not available..."

User:ChrisTheDude: Let me know what you think! Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:08, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824
  • The lead image is more than a decade after this list's year. It would benefit from a "(pictured in 2017)" added to the caption.
  • "serviced to radio" - Is there a better way to put this? I can guess what it means though and if this is common jargon, then leave it as is.
  • All 4 images have Wikipedia-compatible licenses, so this passes image review.
  • No issues with table accessibility.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:12, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Czech Figure Skating Championships

[edit]
Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:18, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since Sweden was just promoted, this is the next national skating championship article in line. The results are all sourced and documented, the tables are properly formatted, and the sources are properly formatted. This national championship competition is interesting in that the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, and Poland combine their national championships into one competition and then split off the top results from each nation to determine the national medalists. Please let me know if you have any feedback or suggestions, and thank you so much! Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:18, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "are held in coordination" - I think "are held in conjunction" would be more common wording
  • That does sound better.
  • "The 2026 Four Nationals Championships are scheduled to be held 11–13 December 2025" => "The 2026 Four Nationals Championships are scheduled to be held on 11–13 December 2025"
  • I always get confused when the dates are DAY/MONTH, so I'll trust you on this one.

User:ChrisTheDude: All fixed. Thank you so much! Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:31, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824

List of awards and nominations received by Kim Seon-ho

[edit]
Nominator(s): Preferwiki (talk) 03:04, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the criteria outlined at WP:FL. The results are all sourced and documented, the tables are properly formatted, the sources are properly formatted and archived, and relevant photographs are used. Additionally, I have already adapted changes that were requested on similar articles to this one so as to avoid issues. Please let me know if you have any feedback and suggestions for improvement. Thank you.Preferwiki (talk) 03:04, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "one [singular] Blue Dragon Film Awards [plural]" doesn't work
     Done
  • " one Grand Bell Awards, as well as a Buil Film Awards." - same for both of these
     Done
  • "tying him with the K-pop girl group Twice." - no reason for the group name to be in italics
     Done
  • "Kim's breakthrough role in Start-Up" - on the other hand, the title of a TV series should be in italics
     Done
  • "he won Most Popular Actor in 57th Baeksang Arts Awards." => "he won Most Popular Actor at the 57th Baeksang Arts Awards."
     Done
  • "he also received the Emotive Award Asia Artist Awards" => "he also received the Emotive Award at the Asia Artist Awards"
     Done
  • "recognized as one of the 2021 Seoul Drama Awards' character of the year" - "one of" suggests multiple characters were recognised, yet you have "character of the year" (singular)
     Done
  • "won Outstanding Actor in the 2022 Seoul Drama Awards." => "won Outstanding Actor at the 2022 Seoul Drama Awards."
     Done
  • "Kim made his debut in the film industry as the title role in Park Hoon-jung's noir film" => "Kim made his debut in the film industry in the title role of Park Hoon-jung's noir film"
     Done
  • "leading to his win of the New Actor Award" => "leading to his winning the New Actor Award"
     Done
  • "at the 32nd Buil Film Awards and the 59th Grand Bell Awards respectively" - there's no reason for the word "respectively"
     Done
  • "nominations in the Most Popular Actor and Best New Actor at the subsequent year 60th Baeksang Arts Awards." => "nominations in the Most Popular Actor and Best New Actor categories at the subsequent year's 60th Baeksang Arts Awards."
     Done
  • Image caption: "Kim Seon-ho at the 2017 MBC Award" => "Kim Seon-ho at the 2017 MBC Awards"
     Done
  • In the "nominee/work" column of the table, titles starting with "The" should sort based on the next word
     Done
    That one is not done. "The Childe" still sorts under T and "The Tyrant" also sorts incorrectly -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I already put sort code to both projects Done
  • Note I should start with a capital letter like all the others -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:28, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    This one is also not done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:22, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I missed this. Now all under Notes section start with capital letter Done
    Preferwiki (talk) 05:53, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Pinging @ChrisTheDude
    I already fix on the latest feedback. Please check again incase I've missed something. Thank you in advance. Preferwiki (talk) 01:56, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orangesclub

[edit]
  • I don't see why Twice need to be mentioned at all, they are tied at fourth most awards which isn't notable.
     Done
  • References #47 and #48 are duplicated
     Done
  • The hyperlinks for the reference and external links sections should be removed from ToC, I don't believe other comparible FLs have them there
     Done
  • For the lead, films should have their release years in parenthesis ie The Childe (2023)
     Done
  • I think the lead could have better flow. A start would be to remove the line break after the first two sentences on his TV roles. Then, earned him a nomination for Best Supporting Actor – Television and he won Most Popular Actor at the 57th Baeksang Arts Awards is a bit confusing on first read - I wasn't sure they were for the same ceremony. I would change it to "earned him an award for Best Supporting Actor at the 57th Baeksang Arts Awards alongside a nomination for Best Supporting Actor at the same ceremony" or something along those lines. Open to your thoughts, I just think it needs to be reworded.
     Done
Rephrased to this: Kim's breakthrough role in Start-Up earned him the Most Popular Actor Award at the 57th Baeksang Arts Awards, alongside a nomination for Best Supporting Actor – Television at the same ceremony.
  • Kim made his debut in the film industry in the title role of Park Hoon-jung's noir film The Childe - this doesn't read well - it is the titular role with the Korean title but in English it reads as if he is a child? I would swap titular for lead.
     Done
Rephrased to this: Kim made his feature film debut as the top biller in Park Hoon-jung's noir film The Childe (2023).
"Top biller" is not an expression in English. I would suggest "Kim made his feature film debut in the leading role of Park Hoon-jung's noir film" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@ChrisTheDude rephrase to this: Kim made his debut in a feature film with top billing in Park Hoon-jung's noir film, The Childe (2023). I use top billing per Mirriam Webster Dictionary [1], because there are two lead roles but Kim was given top billing status in the film.Preferwiki (talk) 07:07, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
For info, "He was given top billing" is a valid expression in English. "He was the top biller" is not a valid expression -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:34, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Rephrase as per suggestion: Kim made his feature film debut in Park Hoon-jung's noir film The Childe (2023), where he was given top billing status. Preferwiki (talk) 03:35, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I also think wikilinking leading man and title role are overlinking.
     Done

That's all from me for now - I will run a script to make dates formatting consistent as I'm already here. Please ping me when done. orangesclub 🍊 14:48, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. All done. @User:Orangesclub Preferwiki (talk) 16:35, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Made latest correction as per suggestion. All done. Thanks again for the reviews. Pinging @ChrisTheDude and @Orangesclub Preferwiki (talk) 03:37, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good work, seems the table's ToC is still including references/links but this isn't dealbreaking for me, support. orangesclub 🍊 20:21, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the support Preferwiki (talk) 08:38, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sonali Bendre filmography

[edit]
Nominator(s): 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 15:22, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the criteria outlined at WP:FL. The list is comprehensive, well-structured, and consistently formatted. It is supported by reliable sources and I’ve made efforts to include all notable entries with verifiable sourcing. Special attention was given to maintaining chronological accuracy and consistency in formatting. I welcome feedback and suggestions for improvement. Thank you. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 15:22, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "along with a few appearances in Kannada, and Tamil cinema" - no reason for that comma before "and"
     Done
  • "for which she received the Filmfare Lux New Face of the Year" => "for which she received the Filmfare Lux New Face of the Year award"
     Done
  • " in the the 1995 romantic thriller Takkar" - the word "the" is in there twice
     Done
  • I would also suggest changing that same sentence to start "She gained" so that you do not have two consecutive sentences starting with "Bendre...."
     Done
  • "The Broken News (2022-2024)" - the dash should be an ndash (–)
     Done
  • "earned her a nomination for the Filmfare OTT Awards for Best Supporting Actress in a Drama Series" => "earned her a nomination at the Filmfare OTT Awards for Best Supporting Actress in a Drama Series"
     Done
  • "Hindi & Tamil" should be "Hindi and Tamil" per MOS:AMPERSAND
     Done
  • "Season 1-3" should be "Seasons 1–3" (with an ndash)
     Done
  • same for "Season 1-2"
     Done
  • "The Broken News" should sort under B, not T
     Done
  • That's it :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:26, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks @ChrisTheDude:. All done.-25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:28, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]


MPGuy2824

List of constituencies of the Goa Legislative Assembly

[edit]
Nominator(s): -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:31, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The 8th in the Indian constituency series from what is probably India's best-known state, Goa. I've improved the lead and added a history section, and brought the table accessibility to FL-standards. Similar, recent FL: Telangana. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:31, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Bgsu98

[edit]
Lead
  • Recommend deleting "Indian" from "the Indian state" since India is specified at the end of the sentence.
  • Recommend wikilinking "independence of India" (and perhaps clarifying that it's from Great Britain), as well as the date (at least the year).
  • Per Reservation in India, "reservation" is not a proper noun and should not be capitalized in "reservation status".
  • "The 2011 census of India stated..." – "stated" sounds a little awkward; perhaps something like "found"?
  • Recommend using the official name – Lok Sabha – along the lines of "A bill was passed in the Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Parliament of India, in 2025..."
Tables
  • The tables have appropriate column and row scopes, and captions.
  • Recommend replacing "#" with {{Abbr|No.|Number}} on the second table.
  • The number 1 should be spelled out "one".

User:MPGuy2824: This is a very interesting article. Please let me know when you have had a chance to examine my comments, and let me know if you have any questions! Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:06, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgsu98: Done all. Thanks for the review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:29, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good! Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 05:37, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Crystal Drawers

[edit]

Will add some comments soon... – Crystal Drawers (talk) 13:25, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Very good job, I don’t see that many issues! Once these are resolved, I’ll take another look and hopefully offer my support :) Crystal Drawers (talk) 22:00, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
1. "have been given reservation status, guaranteeing political representation, and the Constitution" - change to "have been given reservation status—guaranteeing political representation—and the Constitution"
2. "general principles of positive discrimination for SCs and STs. After Goa was annexed from Portugal in 1961, the same principles applied to it as well." - you can probably add a semicolon between STs and After since the second sentence is relevantly short and could easily be added to the previous
That's really it! Again, very nice job. Let me know when you’re finished Crystal Drawers (talk) 22:00, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Crystal Drawers: Applying both these suggestions created a single run-on sentence with too many sub-clauses, IMO. I split it into two sentences after some reordering and correction (the constitution came into effect in 1950). I'm not sure about the emdash now, nor the location of the references after it, so could you please recheck? Thanks for the review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:34, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Understood, my suggestions were more personal preference than anything, anyways. I’ve checked it over and don’t see anything else. Support Crystal Drawers (talk) 11:49, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

World Junior Figure Skating Championships

[edit]
Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 06:08, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the fourth of the four major ISU figure skating competitions. The results are all sourced and documented, the tables are properly formatted, a well-sourced history is provided, the sources are properly formatted and archived, and relevant photographs are used. Additionally, I have already adapted changes that were requested on similar articles to this one so as to avoid previous issues. Please let me know if you have any suggestions or comments, and thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 06:08, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "Natalia Krestianinova and Alexei Torchinski of the Soviet Union, and Sui Wenjing and Han Cong of China, are tied" - don't think those commas are needed You may be right, but I don't like all of those ands in a row.
  • I can do that, but what would you recommend for instances where there are more than two teams tied (which I have in other competitions)?
  • I just realized I use a different structure when there are three or more ties. I have altered the sentence per your recommendation, which is better.
  • The one-sentence paragraph in the history section looks a little odd. Maybe attach it to the end of the one before....? I have joined it to the following paragraph, but also re-edited it to make it flow better. Let me know what you think.
  • "while a points system allows member nations to enter additional competitors or teams" - the word "while" is not appropriate there and can be removed  Done
  • Don't think a "see also" for World Figure Skating Championships is needed as it's linked in the prose  Done
  • That's all I got - nice work as ever! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:ChrisTheDude: I have addressed your feedback. Thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:58, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:ChrisTheDude: I have addressed your follow-up feedback. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:32, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Billboard Tropical Albums number ones from the 1990s

[edit]
Nominator(s): Erick (talk) 01:50, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After getting List of Billboard Latin Pop Albums number ones from the 1990s FL, I wanted to get into the tropical side of the 1990s once more. As always, I look forward to addressing any issues brought up in the comments. Some of albums I remember from my days living in New Jersey during in the 90s. Ah the memories... Erick (talk) 01:50, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "Tropical Albums (formerly known as Tropical/Salsa Latin Albums), is a chart " - no reason for that comma after the brackets
  • "Since its inception, the chart had been published on a fortnightly basis with its positions" => "Initially, the chart was published on a fortnightly basis with its positions"
  • "basing it on electronic point of sale data" => "based on electronic point of sale data"
  • "and was the bestselling tropical of 1990" => "and was the bestselling tropical album of 1990"
  • "tied for the most number one albums of the decade" => "tied for the most number-one albums of the decade"
  • "Merengue music, which rivaled salsa music in the 1980s,[16] also saw its popularity rise in the 1990s" => "Merengue music, which rivaled salsa music in the 1980s,[16] saw its popularity rise in the 1990s"
  • "Juan Luis Guerra, was credited" - no reason for that comma
  • "outside of the working-class" => "outside of the working class"
  • You use both "best-selling" and "bestselling"
  • "Cuban music saw a resurgence in mainstream interested" => "Cuban music saw a resurgence in mainstream interest"
  • "second bestselling Latin album of all-time " => "second bestselling Latin album of all time "
  • "as the bestselling world album of all-time" => "as the bestselling world album of all time"
  • Ref 1 gives an error -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:54, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @ChrisTheDude Thanks for the comments! Let me know if I missed any! Erick (talk) 17:43, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:21, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
MPGuy2824

List of accolades received by Wicked (2024 film)

[edit]
Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk 08:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wicked is a 2024 American musical fantasy film directed by Jon M. Chu and written by Winnie Holzman and Dana Fox. It adapts the first act of the 2003 stage musical by Stephen Schwartz and Holzman, which in turn is based on Gregory Maguire's 1995 novel. A re-imagining of L. Frank Baum's The Wonderful Wizard of Oz and its 1939 film adaptation, the film follows Elphaba Thropp (played by Cynthia Erivo), the future Wicked Witch of the West, and her friendship with her classmate Galinda Upland (played by Ariana Grande), who becomes Glinda the Good, before Dorothy Gale's arrival from Kansas into the Land of Oz. This is my twelfth film accolades list to be nominated for featured list status, and I largely based the format off of the accolades lists for The Artist, Barbie, The Big Short, CODA, Dune, Dunkirk, If Beale Street Could Talk, 1917, Oppenheimer, The Shape of Water, and Slumdog Millionaire. Birdienest81talk 08:57, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • Is there a way to vary the language of the image caption so as not to say "received accolades" three times in one sentence?
  • Jo McLaren's name sorts incorrectly
  • Note d should not have a full stop -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:33, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • @ChrisTheDude: Done - I have read your comments and have made corrections based off of them. Thank you for your feedback.
--Birdienest81talk 09:31, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
MPGuy2824

Older nominations

[edit]

List of BoJack Horseman episodes

[edit]
Nominator(s): Crystal Drawers (talk) 18:59, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because the series holds a special place in my heart and I’d like to see it gain another FL. I’ve modeled it mainly after List of Cobra Kai episodes, but also used other featured lists as a reference. I’m hoping to get this promoted in order to continue my work towards a featured topic of BoJack's seasons. I tried to use only the most high quality sources when citing, and tried to make each paragraph in the lead brief yet comprehensive. Fire away! Crystal Drawers (talk) 19:00, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Octave

[edit]

Based on Special:Diff/1311598945

Reliability

  • What makes The Stony Brook Press, a student-ran newspaper, reliable?
  • Not a big fan of VALNET sources, but Collider is more reliable than most so should be fine.
  • Rolling Stone used appropriately.
  • All others look fine.

Consistency

  • Mixture of Title Case, Sentence case, and Capitalising Every Word: pick one per WP:CITEVAR.
  • Date format is consistent.

Other comments

  • When double quotes are used in quoted text (e.g. "He said "Goodbye!" and left."), the inner quotes should be converted to 'single quotes'.
  • Would recommend bundling citations 2–7 and 17–21.
  • Ref 2: replace WP:ALLCAPS for emphasis with italics.
  • Ref 5: link website; add archive link.
  • Ref 8: no need for italics and quotes around show name.
  • Ref 16: italics for show name.
  • Ref 22: TV show names should be in italics per Wikipedia style and MOS:CONFORM.

Spotchecks – checking 25% of citations:

  • Ref 1: pass
  • Ref 5: pass
  • Ref 8: does not state Will Arnet plays BoJack, but everything else is a pass
  • Ref 14: pass
  • Ref 22: pass
  • Ref 23: pass

Best, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 16:54, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adaptations of Manon Lescaut

[edit]
Nominator(s): ~ L 🌸 (talk) 09:33, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After reading a lot more French literary criticism than I expected, I am confident that this is a fully complete and comprehensive list of adaptations of the tragic love story Manon Lescaut. (I split it out from that article, where I first wrote it, for better summary style.) This is my first FL nomination so I am very eager for feedback! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 09:33, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a comment for whoever does the image review: I've also collected a gallery of related images on the Talk page, and I would highly value advice as to whether any of these should be added to the article. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 06:53, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Bgsu98

[edit]

Considering I have a background in French Literature, I figured I should assist with this review, though my focus was 19th century and not 18th century. Also, I was not familiar with this work prior to this article.

  • I've not heard the phrase "without marriage" versus "outside of marriage".
  • You have some British spellings (ie. "humour") and some American spellings (ie. "dramatize"). You should pick one and stick with it.
  • "These operas varied widely..." I would say they "vary" widely since they presumably still vary.
  • "In the theatrical and operatic adaptations, Manon's three lovers are combined into just one." I recommend perhaps modifying the end of the sentence to clarify "one character".
  • Is there a wikilink for "cinemofono"? I'm guessing if there were one, you'd have used it.

User:LEvalyn: Overall, the article is very well written, as you can see by the very small number of recommendations I have. Please let me know if you have any questions! Bgsu98 (Talk) 23:48, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your comments, I appreciate it! For the first item, I changed to "without marrying" because something about the phrase "outside of marriage" bothers me; let me know if that still sounds off to you. Also, alas, my own native EngVar is an abominable combination of British and American, both "humour" and "dramatize", ie, Canadian English; regrettably, the article is currently consistent. Your other notes I have addressed as you suggest. Nothing to wikilink for cinemofono; I haven't been able to turn up any information about it, really. Thank you again for taking a look! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 01:31, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I will trust you when you say the English is consistent with Canadian English. The rest is good. I am happy to support. I will also come back to do the source review for you in a few days. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:43, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Source review (9/25/25)

[edit]
  • Random spot check of sources checks out.
  • Formatting of sources appears to be correct and appropriate. I would recommend providing wikilinks for sources (ie. Rotten Tomatoes) when available.

Source review passes. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:16, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for coming back for the source review, appreciate it! I've added some more wikilinks to the sources. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 03:10, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "Key scenes that thteey consistently include are the reconciliation at Saint-Sulpice, the scene with the Italian prince" - sould you give a tiny bit more context to this? Who is reconciled? Who is "the Italian prince"? This sentence seems to assume a level of knowledge of the story which nothing up to this point in the article has imparted
  • Notes 6, 10 and 13 are sentence fragments so should not have full stops -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:42, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Great point about those plot details, thank you-- I've added more context. Please let me know if it still feels unclear, or if you think the article would benefit from including a longer summary of the novel's original plot. I've also removed those full stops. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 00:11, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:36, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from TechnoSquirrel69

[edit]

Wow, I'm glad my suggestion for a split has already landed up at a quality assessment venue! There's a few comments I made at the Manon Lescaut PR that also apply here, so I'll copy them over. I'll hopefully be back for a more thorough review next week. Citation numbers from this revision.

  • Could you briefly go over how reliable Jean Sgard is?
  • Was there an RSN discussion about the reliability of the English National Ballet?
  • Do we have anything better as a source than Kenneth MacMillan's own website? I see a book in the article about that ballet that could serve as a replacement.
  • MOS:WEBITALICS advises against using the |publisher= parameter for websites.
  • I'd recommend switching citation 17 to sentence case to match everything else. Use |url-status=live. Add the publication date.
  • Unitalicize the year in citation 29.
  • Italics for the titles in citations 31, 36, 39, and 40 (and maybe a few more too).
  • I wouldn't recommend providing URLs for Adams 2023 or Leichman 2017. The DOIs already link to the same places, and the links imply free access (the |doi-access=free attribute causes this behavior, for example). If you'd like to keep them, use |url-access=subscription consistently.
  • En dash between the years on Klossner 2002.

Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:04, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this, and now I feel silly that I didn’t double check those peer review comments myself before nominating here! I’ll work through them and let you know when they’re all done. For the first point, about Jean Sgard, he’s a French literature professor and the world expert on Prevost; everybody else cites him all the time. The article relies on him a lot because I sought out his books intentionally as the best source on the topic. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 22:38, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
All right, I think I have now addressed all but two of these! 1, I started a discussion at RSN about the English National Ballet site but actual consensus will have to wait for the discussion. And 2, I'm not sure what you mean by "use |" regarding citation 17. Where does it need to be used? Also, let me know if you still have questions/concerns about Sgard -- I can dig up some quotes about him from the sources, I think Angela Scholar's introduction to Manon has some kind of explanation of his influence on the scholarship. Thanks again for your suggestions! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 03:10, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops, I always seem to trip over myself when using the {{para}} template — fixed! Your changes look good to me so far. I'll try and make time for a full prose review later this week, but please go ahead and ping me if I forget. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 04:28, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I understand now! I set that URL status to "live". As an update on the RSN discussion, there's only been one comment there, which says I don't see why anyone should doubt their reliability. So I feel pretty sanguine about that source. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 19:05, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, definitely use website= for websites and publisher= for printed sources. The only exception I know of is if the document you access on-line is a PDF, then you can use publisher=. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:37, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Gold Coast suburbs

[edit]
Nominator(s): Idiosincrático (talk) 15:38, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Gold Coast is a city and local government area in Queensland, Australia and is divided into 81 suburbs and localities (they're virtually the same). It's an amazing city which, from what I often see, is not well known outside Australia. Beaches, mountains, rivers, high-rises, Monaco-esque marinas, and woeful housing affordability, what more could you want! Idiosincrático (talk) 15:38, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Steelkamp

[edit]

I'll review this. Steelkamp (talk) 15:43, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Is there a source for the suburb vs locality column?
Each division is designated a suburb or locality in the Place names gazetteer citation linked in the title of the table Idiosincrático (talk) 05:19, 21 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Bgsu98

[edit]

Note: The following were originally posted as a drive-by comment:

Additional comments
  • What is meant by "gazetted"?
  • The city's divisions are gazetted into 52 suburbs (urban areas) and 29 localities (rural areas),[6] they are stretched from the Queensland state border to the south, the Coral Sea to the east, the Albert River to the north and the Gold Coast hinterland and Scenic Rim to the west. – That comma after (rural areas) is inappropriate. Use either a semicolon or separate into two sentences.
  • The largest division is the Southern Moreton Bay Islands locality (83.9 km2), it is also the only unpopulated division. Again, inappropriate use of a comma. Recommend use of a semicolon.
  • Is "PO Box" is preferred abbreviation for post office box in Australia?
  • The table has a column for locality v. suburb, but what is the difference between these two designations?
  • Recommend flipping the 2016 census and 2021 census columns. As currently presented, the math is backwards when calculating the change.

User:Idiosincrático Please let me know if you have any questions! Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:46, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I linked gazetted to government gazette, which I admit is an outdated term with the advent of the internet but it's used a lot in references so I kept it in. I fixed the other small stuff, linked the column header for suburb vs. locality with the relevant Suburbs and localities article and removed the PO box abbreviation. Thanks for the review! Idiosincrático (talk) 09:23, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

[edit]

Very happy to see this in FLC, been to a few of them before to see relatives. Also my first time conducting an image review, so patience is appreciated. Icepinner 13:50, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • File:Gold Coast suburbs map.jpg — CC BY SA 3.0
    • This could benefit a caption. It probably wouldn't need ALT text cause it would just be the same thing Needs ALT text
  • File:CSIRO ScienceImage 7482 Highrise development at Southport Queensland.jpg — CC BY SA 3.0
    • Needs ALT text. Can the image description be changed so that it isn't a direct copy paste from the website?
  • File:Surfers Paradise, QLD skyline.jpg
    • Needs ALT text
  • File:Broadbeach skyscrapers, Gold Coast, Queensland, 2020, 01.jpg
    • Needs ALT text

That's all I have. Location of the photographs may not be necessary since the description parameter already does the job. Icepinner 13:50, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alt-texts are required even if they are similar to the captions. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:11, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, thanks for the clarification. Icepinner 00:55, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Icepinner: – All addressed, thank you for the review. Idiosincrático (talk) 04:49, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, passing image review. Icepinner 06:59, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by SounderBruce

[edit]
  • First paragraph could be fleshed out with some basic details about the city as a whole (total population, rank among Australian and Queensland cities, total area, etc.) to provide context.
  • Consider changing up the first sentence of the second paragraph, which repeats "The City of Gold Coast".
  • Link to the term "gazetted"?
  • "they are stretched" is awkward, perhaps "they stretch" to maintain the tense?
  • The areas should use {{convert}} to add square mile figures.

That's all I have from my first pass. SounderBruce 23:12, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've addressed everything here. I opted not to include any area info as references are inconsistent between ABS and council. I mentioned population and economy statistics instead. Thanks for the review! Idiosincrático (talk) 11:56, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The economy sentence reads very promotionally; I suggest only mentioning the largest industry and dropping terms like "key strength". I also think that some of the population comparisons can be trimmed, as mentioning Brisbane's size is probably not needed here. The repeated use of "the LGA" to begin paragraphs should also be addressed. SounderBruce 04:08, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • I'd be tempted to merge that opening one-sentence "paragraph" with the next one
  • "The ABS-defined Gold Coast–Tweed Heads significant urban area (SUA) had a population of 750,997 people, it is" - either change "it is" to "and is" or change the comma to a semi-colon
  • "they stretch from the Queensland state border to the south, the Coral Sea to the east, the Albert River to the north and the Gold Coast hinterland and Scenic Rim to the west" => "they stretch from the Queensland state border to the south to the Albert River to the north, and from the Coral Sea to the east to the Gold Coast hinterland and Scenic Rim to the west"
  • Both notes need full stops
  • That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:04, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi, I think I've addressed everything. Thank you for the review! Idiosincrático (talk) 05:00, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:33, 24 September 2025 (UTC)s[reply]

List of World Heritage Sites in Colombia

[edit]
Nominator(s): Tone 20:43, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Colombia has 9 World Heritage sites and 13 tentative sites. Standard style. The list for China is already seeing support so I am adding a new nomination. (It took me a while to address the comments for China since that list is massive, but this time it is a bit shorter nomination.) Tone 20:43, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Easternsahara

[edit]
  • In the map, could you use red to represent cultural sites, green to represent the two natural sites and blue to represent the mixed sites. Then you could replace the sites with multiple locations which use green and blue with turquoise or purple or orange, your choice. This is common in most other maps for lists (as you know)
  • "World Heritage Committee three times" could you specify all times
  • a Pleistocene refugium" → "refugium during the Pleistocene" per MOS:SOB
  • "the site was listed as endangered upon" → "the site was listed as endangered, after"
  • "The situation has improved by 2015" → "The situation improved by 2015,"
  • "in 1540 as" → "in 1540, as"
  • "Spanish colonization of the region" link to Spanish conquest of the Muisca. I think that Spanish colonization of the Americas would be too broad and that Spanish conquest of New Granada is the wrong region.
  • "The tombs are often decorated with polychrome paintings with geometric designs or animal and human motifs, and with stone carvings. " → "The tombs often feature polychrome paintings with geometric designs, animal and human motifs, and stone carvings. " I think "or" can be removed unless you're saying that they featured either the geometric designs or motifs with stone carvings. If all of them are carved in stone, then I'd just add "stone-carved" after "feature"
  • "aggregations" link to Shoaling and schooling
  • "marine life," I think a colon would work better instead of a comma since a lengthy dependent clause follows
  • the hammerhead sharks" singular works better
  • "Spanish influences" link to Spanish Colonial architecture if this was specifically during the colonial period, otherwise Spanish architecture works
  • "Department who" comma before who
  • "sombrero aguadeño" this is directly linked to spanish wiki but per H:FOREIGNLINK you should use Template:Interlanguage link
  • "The site is shared with Argentina (a section pictured), Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador, and Peru" link al the countries? optional but maybe helpful
  • Link "endemic" to Endemism, unfamiliarity
  • "rock art through millennia" for instead of through is more common, I am not sure about this use of through
  • "The paintings include scenes with dances, battles, and ceremonies, as well as depictions of plants and animals. " remove "scenes with" and "depictions of"
  • "indigenous communities" link to Indigenous peoples in Colombia
  • "The canal connects Cartagena, Colombia's main port, with the Magdalena River, country's main river, which however is not navigable in its delta due to obstacles" → "The canal connects Cartagena, Colombia's main port; with the Magdalena River, country's main river; which, however, is not navigable in its delta due to obstacles" Please use semicolons for complex lists where appropriate, I have seen some other instances in the main list section. Please double check
  • "because of lack" → "due to a lack" should use a, due to is less repetitive
  • "an engineering challenge" → "an engineering challenge due to its scale" is in source and adds detail
  • redlink "Fritz Karsen " and link to https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fritz_Karsen using aforementioned template

Glad to see you active again, nice list, mostly nitpicks. I might continue my review later. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 01:06, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • "which is a World Heritage Site" link "World Heritage Site" to [[List of World Heritage sites in Venezuela and make the "Site" lowercase as that is what Wikipedia predominantly uses and what the article itself predominately uses.
  • "agriculture, however" → "agriculture. However"
  • "gold smiting" → "gold smithing"
  • "Gabriel García Márquez, the workers"→"Gabriel García Márquez; the workers"
  • "the third largest bridge in the world " link this to List of highest bridges or List of longest bridges or List of tallest bridges depending on what made it the largest
  • "people mostly of African descent" link to Afro-Colombians
  • "those from Mesoamerica" link to Mesoamerican architecture
  • "marine invertebrates" link to marine invertebrates
  • "evolution of life" link to Evolution of life
  • "Museum"→"A museum" (sentence fragment rn)
  • File:Colombia location map.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Baluarte de Santo Domingo, Cartagena 01.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Rio Atrato.JPG - PD
  • File:Santa barbara dia.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Tombs in Tierra Dentro.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Parque Arqueológico de San Agustín - Tumb with deity.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Malpelo island NOAA.jpg - PD
  • File:Cafetales, en Colombia.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Jujuy Sección Quebrada Grande-Las Escaleras, Foto 1 (14960178156) (2).jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • File:Chiribiquete view.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:ESC large ISS006 ISS006-E-14568-NurSanAndres.jpg - PD
  • File:Abrazo del sol al rio.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Plaza Che, Bogotá.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:YAEL PHOTOS 898.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Santuario de Fauna y Flora Iguaque.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Puente de occidente en santa fe de antioquia.JPG - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Puente en zona de palafitos en Nueva Venecia-Sitionuevo-Magdalena-Colombia.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Ccggm Btá.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Platyceras Floresta.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • suitable alt text for images, pass image review. Waiting for a comment on prose, @Tone: 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 16:04, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Olympic medalists for Malaysia

[edit]
Nominator(s): 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 06:22, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because this list is a comprehensive and accessible list which is worthy of FL status. This list mentions all of Olympic medalists from the main Olympics, Youth Olympics, and demonstration games. All of the content in the list is sourced, and it has an engaging lead and history section. It also is accessible with recommendations from my previous nomination. I created and nominated this list because of a support vote from the previous nomination. Thanks, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 06:22, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "Malaysia made its debut at the Olympics at the 1956 Summer Olympics, the delegation did not gain a medal in their first five participations" => "Malaysia made its debut at the Olympics at the 1956 Summer Olympics, but did not gain a medal in their first five participations"
  • There's no reason to have a capital B on badminton (this occurs in multiple places)
  • "The delegation never gained a gold medal" => "The delegation has never gained a gold medal" (unless Malaysia has permanently stopped entering the Olympics)
  • Link Malaysia in body as well as lead
  • Link Razif and Jalani Sidek in body as well as lead
  • Link 1956 Summer Olympics in body as well as lead
  • Can we explain briefly why Malaysia did not compete at the Olympics until 1956?
  • "After a 12-year drought of medals in the 2000 and 2004 Olympics," - this reads weirdly. Suggest simply "After failing to win any medals at the 2000 and 2004 Olympics,"
  • "through Lee Chong Wei, who nearly won against Lin Dan." - who nearly won what event? How did Wei "nearly win"? Who is Lin Dan?
  • "gained the first bronze medal in Diving that same year" - no reason for capital D on diving
  • "four silver medals and one bronze medal was gained" => "four silver medals and one bronze medal were gained" ("was" is the singular form of the noun so not appropriate when the subject is plural)
  • "In the 2020 Olympics, a bronze medal and a silver medal was gained" - same here
  • "the silver being the first silver medal for Cycling through Awan" - no reason for capital C on cycling
  • "The delegation never gained a gold medal" => "The delegation has never gained a gold medal"
  • Awang image caption should show his name in full and not have a capital C on cycling
  • Tables should sort based on surname, not forename
  • "Malaysia had three medals from participants in a Mixed team" => "Malaysia has three medals from participants in a mixed team"
  • Also, at which Olympics (youth or "normal") were the mixed team medals gained?
  • "Malaysia gained three silver medals and four bronze medals from demonstration sports; the following are medalists in the demonstration games:" => "Malaysia has gained three silver medals and four bronze medals from demonstration sports." (no need for the "the following....." bit)
  • As an aside......"I created and nominated this list because of a support vote from the previous nomination" - as per the instructions at the top, you should not nominate another article until the previous one has substantial support, not just a single !vote, but I had already written all those comments above before I noticed this, so I will leave them here anyway -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:42, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @ChrisTheDude: Fixed everything except:
    • Badminton capitalization on tables: I think this is suitable already.
    • Explanation on how Lin Dan nearly won: I do not think it is mentioned in the source.
    Fixed. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 12:34, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Tables should sort based on surname, not forename: In Malaysia, there is no surname or forename.
    • Olympics for Youth: I thought they were already mentioned by the year column.
    🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 13:09, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

[edit]

Crystal Drawers

[edit]

1. The word "gain" is used three times very close to eachother in the lead, could you replace at least one of them?

2. "in the Olympics at the 1956 Summer Olympics at Melbourne sending a total of 32 athletes" - change to "in the Olympics at the 1956 Summer Olympics at Melbourne, sending a total of 32 athletes"

3. "first silver medal from Cheah Soon Kit and Yap Kim Hock who participated in badminton…" - change to "first silver medal from Cheah Soon Kit and Yap Kim Hock, who participated in badminton…"

That's it, I’ll check the article again once these issues are fixed and hopefully support Crystal Drawers (talk) 12:24, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Crystal Drawers: fixed. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 12:34, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent! Very nice job on the list, happy to support
Also, consider checking out my FLC (if you have the time, of course, no pressure!) Crystal Drawers (talk) 12:37, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of World Heritage Sites in Palestine

[edit]
Nominator(s): User:Easternsahara

Another World Heritage Site list which will (hopefully) become a Featured List. Palestine has five Sites that are already inscribed, with 13 on the tentative list. The list follows the typical World Heritage Site list structure, modeled specifically after the Egypt list. Due to Palestine's unique relationship with UNESCO, due to the Arab-Israeli conflict, Gerald Waldo Luis has included two paragraphs in the lead to address those. Therefore, this also includes some secondary coverage, mostly in the last paragraph of the lead. As Gerald has done most of the work, but has not been active for some time, I have decided to nominate it for him. I look forward to addressing your comments, thank you. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 02:21, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Easternsahara, thank you for making this FLC on behalf of me, and I'm glad to see that this nomination has only made the article even better! Yes, I have not been able to maintain a consistent activity for a while as you can tell. I'm going to move out to a new country for study and there's just so much going on, I couldn't afford time for WP even if I wanted to. I hope it's not a burden for you to handle all the comments here, and I think you deserve as much credit as I do. Thanks once again! GeraldWL 04:30, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

[edit]

Comments by Richard Nevell

[edit]

@Richard Nevell:, I have done everything that you have pointed out. The Jerusalem site didn't have a rationale for endangerment explained on any of the conservation reports. I chose to keep the Doundation for the Defense of Democracies, but if you tell me to I will replace it.

  • As a starting point, the list of current sites, tentative sites, (mostly) criteria, and inscription dates match the most authoritative source on the matter – the UNESCO website.
  • The one criteria I've spotted that doesn't match the source is Ancient Jericho. The WP list says it is (i)(ii)(iii)(iv), but the UNESCO website only lists (iii)(iv).
    • Fixed
  • The locator map is consistent with other lists of WHS. Others use colour-coding, but that's not necessary here. I have two queries:
  • Color coding is used when there are both cultural and natural sites AND/OR, a site with multiple sub-regions.
  • Is there a reason Deir al-Balah isn't a link like the other labels?
    • I have changed the labels to be shortened versions of the WHS name like in other maps, I have linked all of them.
  • Can the text be made larger? At the moment, the characters are almost the same thickness as the light grey lines to mark internal boundaries on the map, and some of the labels blend in as a result.
    • I agree with this problem, and I have made the text bigger, please tell me if this is sufficient. I was originally going to bold it, but I think that would've been a violation of MOS:BOLD
  • I wonder if it would be worth having a sentence explaining the significance of World Heritage Site status. This could be a useful source.
    • Other World Heritage Sites lists do not do this because it is not as relevant. If someone wants to know the significance of WHS status, then they can click on the main parent page. If someone's using printed wikipedia then they can access that page but I think there is enough context
  • The lead gives an appropriate level of detail, comparable to other lists of WHS. The extra political context is appropriate since the issue has significance for UNESCO generally.
  • You could say that "Palestine: Land of Olives and Vines – Cultural Landscape of Southern Jerusalem, Battir" is the largest WHS in Palestine,.
    • Other World Heritage Sites lists do not do this because size doesn't really matter, the age of the first site (how long the country has been actively participating in unesco) and when the newest one was promoted (if it still is participating) and the number matter more. Having too much detail would violate WP:TOOMUCH, WP:SUMMARY STYLE.
  • In 2011, responding to allegations that they were to assign the site to a state: I'm not sure "allegations" is the right word here as it's not disputed that they haven't assigned the site to a state in their list.
    • No, the response was to allegations that they would assign it to a state, like palestine or israel or jordan. This didn't happen though, and UNESCO just said "we won't yet, but we will protect it from degradation and it is palestinian territory
  • Where a site is endangered, there's a brief statement on why except for Jerusalem.
    • will add
  • The United States had also withdrew funding, 20% of UNESCO's total, from UNESCO in 2011, under the Obama administration, because American federal law…: that's a little repetitive. How about: The United States had also withdrew its funding of UNESCO in 2011, under the Obama administration, accounting for more than 20% of the agency's budget; this was because American federal law… I suggest adding "more than" since the source cited says "about 22 percent".
    • I will put more than because fdd put that but the "about 22 percent" is about how much biden said he'll fund unesco for, not when obama initially withdrew it
  • I am not familiar with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies; what makes them a reliable source of information?
    • It is an American funded advocate organization for Israel. If it is deemed inappropriate then I can remove it and replace it with something else. However, this will result in the loss of the percentage info and while it is a biased source, we aren't putting any bias int he article by using it. idk up to u
  • The photo of the Wadi Gaza is of a section in Israel, and not part of the WHS. I'm only aware of two images of the wetlands on Commons, and neither show the area particularly well. This one is the better of the two.
    • Done
  • The site descriptions mention when sites were added to the tentative list, but I don't think this is needed as it doesn't tell us why the sites are significant.
    • I think it does, so it can become a world heritage site.
      • I think it's a transient quality and doesn't need to be mentioned as one a site is on the main list when it was nominated is of secondary importance by a significant margin, perhaps not even important at all. Richard Nevell (talk) 22:34, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Established amid the Mamluk Sultanate: maybe Established during the Mamluk Sultanate
    • Done
  • Link Mamluk architecture
    • Done
  • Battir's valleys and terraces are used for market garden: The grammar doesn't quite work, but either "used for market gardening" or "used as market gardens" would.
  • For Battir, I think it would be helpful to give an idea of the age of the landscape that has been designated, as in when were the terraces created.
  • named after the namesake saint: This is a bit clunky, and we might as well say "Saint Hilarion".
    • Agree
  • The site also includes Herodium, a Roman castle whose fortress was converted into…: While this is in line with what the UNESCO source says, it wasn't a castle in the commonly understood sense (though as a fortified high-status residence its purpose is actually pretty close). For clarity, I suggest The site also includes Herodium, a fortified palace that was adapted into…
    • Done
  • Side note: It is very surprising that the article on Herodium doesn't mention the conversion into a monastery.
  • Hisham's Palace is referred to as a ski resort. I've not seen that term used in the articles I've read on the palace, and the term UNESCO uses is "winter resort". Maybe instead of A ski resort for the caliph … something like Intended as a winter palace for the caliph…
    • Done
  • it was ruined by the 749 Galilee earthquake: This is consistent with the UNESCO source, but implies that the site was abandoned, but there were periods of use into the 13th century (see page 60 of this source).
    • I have changed it to "heavily impacted"
  • Instead of [[Qumran Caves|QUMRAN: Caves]] and Monastery of the [[Dead Sea Scrolls]] how about [[Qumran|QUMRAN]]: [[Qumran Caves|Caves]] and Monastery of the [[Dead Sea Scrolls]] Otherwise the list doesn't have a link to the main Qumran page.
  • I think it would be worth mentioning the year the Dead Sea Scrolls were discovered.

That's my first pass. I think some of the descriptions may need a copy edit. The tweaks to prose that I've suggested are not comprehensive. The article has a good structure and sourcing. It could be enhanced by making reference to academic works on relevant sites (eg: the source I suggested on Hisham's Palace) but I'm unsure if that's a pre-requisite for FLs. While UNESCO's description of Hisham's Palace is a bit out of step with some of the research I've seen, the other stuff conforms with my (admittedly limited) knowledge of some of these sites. Richard Nevell (talk) 18:59, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    • Okay I will begin the copyedit. I believe the descriptions to the sites on the lists are an introduction to the world heritage site, then the reader should click on the link(s) that interest them to learn more. Admittedly, the actual world heritage site articles are not in very good shape, so this is hindered

Image and source review

[edit]

Easternsahra agreed to a QPQ for List of Singapore LRT stations, so I might as well get it over with. Icepinner 16:14, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Icepinner:, I have finished adding detailed descriptions and I have addressed the source reviews which Richard Nevell has not already fixed, thanks! 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 12:59, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I am passing the source review. My only issue is with File:Palestine Qumran BW 6.jpg; I realise that it needs a detailed description since "Qumran" is not sufficient. Once this has been fixed, I will pass the image review. Icepinner 00:49, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have added more details @Icepinner: 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 16:20, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Passing image review. Icepinner 00:28, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Image review
[edit]
Source review
[edit]

Style comment: I changed the column widths in the tables to the values I am currently using. The images could be full 150px so that they are well aligned, since some are landscape and some portrait. In the tentative list, mostly you have governorate as the location but in some cases you have more specific locations - try to be consistent here. I may check the text at a later point but I see there were already some reviewers. Nice work! --Tone 20:39, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tone:, I have fixed both the location and dates being too specific, now they are consistent with other lists. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 21:51, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Easternsahara: Do you intend to continue with this nomination? --PresN 12:55, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I will finish this week. I just have to add detailed descriptions to 3 more images and add a little bit more information on Jerusalem 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 21:21, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have now finished, I am just waiting for supports or more comments 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 21:51, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Olympic medalists for the Philippines

[edit]
Nominator(s): 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 05:23, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because the article is fully sourced and contains everything needed in this list. The lead, although short, describes most of the article. I did all of the things stated in the last archive (as I remember). If the lead is too short, the history section also describes the tables well. In conclusion, it meets the criteria. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 05:23, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

[edit]
Do clarify in the first paragraph whether you've completed all the suggestions provided in the previous nomination of this list. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:00, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment from Bgsu98

[edit]

MOS:SANDWICH does not bother me in this particular situation. In fact, it really can't be avoided. The image is vertical and the infobox is vertical, so it is not really a problem. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:43, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • "The Philippines made its debut in the Olympics during the 1924 Summer Olympics. The Philippines won its first medal during the 1928 Summer Olympics when Teófilo Yldefonso gained a bronze medal" => "The Philippines made its debut in the Olympics during the 1924 Summer Olympics and won its first medal during the 1928 Summer Olympics when Teófilo Yldefonso gained a bronze medal" (avoids having both of the first two sentences start with "The Philippines")
  • "the Philippines gained three medals, the most medals given in a specific competition until 2020" - reword - this makes it sound like it was the most medals won by any nation until 2020
  • "The Philippines gained its first gold medal at the 2020 Summer Olympics by Hidilyn Diaz" => "The Philippines gained its first gold medal at the 2020 Summer Olympics when Hidilyn Diaz won [whatever they won]"
  • "Moreover, one athlete has gained a medal" => "Additionally, one athlete has gained a medal"
  • "the commonwealth won" - this is an Easter egg link as I doubt many people in the rest of the world are aware that it is/was officially the Commonwealth of the Philippines
  • "won its first medal when swimmer Teófilo Yldefonso" - link the name
  • "the men's 200 metre breaststroke aquatic event" => "the men's 200 metre breaststroke swimming event"
  • "After independence from the United States, the country did not win" => "After independence from the United States, the Philippines did not win"
  • "the Philippines won another medal at the 2016 Summer Olympics when Hidilyn Diaz" - link Diaz's name
  • "finished second at the women's 53 kg weightlifting in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil" => "finished second in the women's 53 kg weightlifting in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil"
  • "won medals, specifically Aira Villegas, with a" - there seems to be a random line break (at least on my screen) after "specifically"
  • Some of the rowscopes are missing in the Medal tally by individual and Multiple medalists tables
  • That's what I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:21, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Fixed everything except the Multiple medalists rowscopes; should I double bold them or not? The "active competitors" thing seems pretty useful. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 07:44, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Ah, I only just noticed the bit below the table. Use a symbol to represent the ones who are active. I am pretty sure we are not meant to use bold to indicate something anyway, as screen readers used by people with vision problems don't read out the "boldness" of the words -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:53, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Did something using the {{legend}} template; does it seem okay? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 08:06, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @ChrisTheDude: forgot to ping. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 08:10, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Colour by itself also can't be used to designate something per MOS:ACCESSIBILITY (Color should not be used as the sole visual means of conveying information, or for distinguishing elements such as links, templates, or table rows. Always provide an alternative method—such as an accessible symbol and/or text (for example, ✔ Approved), a colored table with an icon and text (for example, see table on the right), or clearly written footnote labels.). You need to add a symbol as well as/instead of the colour -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:19, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @ChrisTheDude: Should I use this symbol? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 08:28, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Note sure that that is an accessible symbol. I tend to use {{doubledagger}}..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:30, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Used the symbol. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 08:33, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:21, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

MrLinkinPark333 (verification check)

[edit]

I've found a lot of verification issues. As they are a lot, I will sort them.

Prose
[edit]
  • "The Philippines made its Olympic debut during the 1924 Summer Olympics" - fails verification of Citius, Altius, Fortius and GamesBid.
  • "the commonwealth won its first medal" - Neither Sports Reference or International Swimming Hall of Fame mention that the Philippines was a commonwealth during 1928.
  • "the country was awarded three bronze medals, the most for the Filipinos until the 2020 Summer Olympics." - Fails verification for 2 reasons. BBC Sport does not mention the 1932 Olympic medals for the Philippines. This source also does not have their 2020 medals because it was written before the Olympics started.
  • "After independence from the United States, the Philippines did not win another medal until the 1964 Summer Olympics" - citation needed as Olympedia does not mention the Philippines independence nor their medal drought.
  • "and his brother Mansueto "Onyok" Velasco - "Philippines at the 1996 Summer Olympics Olympedia source doesn't state that the Velascos are brothers.
  • Petecio's Olympedia citation needs to be moved and go after "women's featherweight boxing finals".
  • Paalam's Olympedia citation needs to be moved and go after "men's flyweight boxing finals".
  • Last part of the History section "Aira Villegas ... semi-finals" needs the extra space removed. Currently, the "In the 2024 Summer Olympics" sentence looks uncited, even though it has a citation.
  • "These Olympians are entitled to government incentives under Republic Act 9064 and Republic Act 10699." - citation needed.
  • "This excludes the Wushu Tournament Beijing 2008, which was not an official Olympic demonstration sport for the 2008 edition." - citation needed
Tables
[edit]
  • Three tables fail verification of the medallists' home regions. They are Medals gained from the Summer Olympics, Medals gained from the Youth Summer Olympics and Medals gained from Mixed teams.
  • There is failed verification from Olympedia in the Medal tally by sport, Medal tally by individual and Multiple medalists tables. This is because Olympedia's IOC sponsorship ended in 2023. Therefore, they don't have any coverage from 2024.
  • Panay News does not specify that Tio won the IKA Twin Tip Racing event, as part of the men's kiteboarding.
  • Is the years supposed to be the timelines that each athlete competed, or when they won their medals? This is confusing as, for example, Yulo won both of his medals in 2024. In the table, his years are listed as 2020-2024.
Minor issues
[edit]
  • In the prose, I see issues of sources not giving the same exact weight classes and Olympic cities.
  • Prose also has issues of sources not specifying that the bronze medal matches for boxing (2020 and 2024) occurred in the semi-finals.
  • Tables also have issue of sources not given exact swimming length and boxing weight classes.
  • For 2024 boxing in the Medals gained from the Summer Olympics table, IOC does not state classes. They instead use the weights.

Oppose I am very concerned about the uncited and failed verification I found in the prose. I am also concerned about the failed verification of the home regions in the three tables. There are also minor issues, such as weight classes and Olympic cities not being specified in the source. Therefore, I will have to oppose because of the major failed verification issues. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:18, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of constituencies of the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly

[edit]
Nominator(s): -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:20, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back after a few months with the 7th in the Indian constituency series. I've improved the lead and history sections, and brought the table accessibility to FL-standards. Similar, recent FL: Telangana. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:20, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Easternsahara

[edit]
  • Source 1 only verifies the 2023 part, not the "3 December" part. Please change it to verify all of this
    • ✓ The specific date wasn't important, so I've left only the year. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
  • Infoboxes should ideally be used for things already mentioned in the text, so they usually do not need citations. "First past the post" and "December 2028" are not mentioned in the article, so they need citations. Also, could you add "current legislature" to 16th Rajasthan Assembly as it changes
    • Could you elaborate on the last sentence please? There is no "current_legislature" param in the {{Infobox legislature}} template. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
      • I see, then you can just ignore
    • ✓ I've removed the specific date for the last election and removed the tenative date of the next election since it was speculative (counted as last election +term limit). -MPGuy2824 (talk)
  • Source 2 verifies the sentence directly preceding it, and the second instance, but not "the unicameral state legislature" or that the seat is in Jaipur.
  • Source 3 is good, I wonder if you should use Template:Cite map?
  • Source 4 is good
  • Source 5 will not load for me yet, is it dead? but you put "pp. 6, 12." while others u just put a colon and the page number. For sake of consistency, you should stick with either one of these styles
  • I will check the other sources later, but 6 has the same concern as 5 with the page numbers
    • ✓ Those sources aren't dead, but probably geo-restricted. I've replaced one of them with a ref that seemed to have been archived before the restriction came into place. I've used the page number next to the citation in all 3 places now. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
  • File:Rajasthan Assembly.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:IN-RJ.svg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Wahlkreise zur Vidhan Sabha von Rajasthan.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • Please change alt texts to the last map (3rd image) to align with Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility/Alternative text for images#Maps and diagrams I think first map is okay but if you want to specify northwest india then its up to you
    • I've added north-west to the first map image. I'm not that good at writing alt-text so this might be a good opportunity to learn for me: I read MOS:ALTMAP, but since the current alt-text for the 2nd map is "Map showing the constituencies of the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly", I'm not sure what to do. The best I can come up with is "Rajasthan's ST seats are concentrated in its south and the east, while the SC seats are quite dispersed". Is that good enough? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:06, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes it is good enough 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 12:09, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Done. The rest were done before. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:50, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • There are large white spaces created on my monitor from the images in both the "Constituencies" and "History" sections, not sure what can be done about this
    • ✓ I have reduced the size of the locator map. Rajasthan is the largest state in India and its location is still visible. Hopefully that fixes/reduces the issue. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
      • pass image review
  • The prose itself is quite clear

Thanks, if you ever nominate future lists similar to them, I'll review 'em. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 16:26, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Easternsahara: I've done a lot of these and have a couple of questions for you (inline). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:06, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please apply this advice here to the Telangana list as well
  • citation nine still has page numbers inside the citation and not next to it.
  • sources 12, 13, 15-17, 19-25, 26-28 are georestricted and thus I can not review them. I would assume good faith as this list has not showed errors and the sources themselves verify very minor things
  • 11, 14, 18 passes, just verifies existence
  • 10 pass both uses
  • Please add a source to verify that Jaipur is the capital of the state, it might be a case of WP:SKYBLUE, but I find the refutations to that essay to be convincing.
  • Source review pass, support

Comments

[edit]

List of municipalities in Málaga

[edit]
Nominator(s): Alavense (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2025 (UTC) and Mattximus (talk)[reply]

Mattximus and I are working on bringing up the lists of municipalities of all Spanish provinces up to the standard seen in other similar featured lists. Our two previous nominations have already garnered some support, so I am nominating another one. This is the 12th nomination in the series and the list has therefore benefited from the improvements suggested by reviewers in the previous eleven. Formatting is also similar to the others. In any case, all comments and suggestions are welcome and will be acted upon in a timely manner. Thanks in advance for all the comments! Alavense (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

[edit]

Here'll be an image review from me. Arconning (talk) 15:07, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • File:Malaga in Spain.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Karte Gemeinden und Gerichtsbezirke Provinz Málaga 2022.png - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Vista de Málaga desde el castillo de Gibralfaro, España, 2023-05-20, DD 113.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Captivating Views of Old Town Marbella.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Mijas 05.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Castillo de Vélez-Málaga.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Fuengirola Puerto 02.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Estepona aerial.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • Alt-text and captions are proper.
    • Can say that image review shall be passed.
Thanks for taking the time to review the list, Arconning. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 06:39, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of governors of Abia State

[edit]
Nominator(s): Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:45, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the list of governors of Nigeria's state of Abia from when the region was called Eastern then split into East Central and two other states, then East Central was split into Anambra and Imo states, then Abia carved out of Imo. I have made significant improvements on this, and it now meets the criteria for FL. Feedback would be very much appreciated. Thank you already. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:45, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comments

[edit]

Reading Beans

[edit]

I am reviewing this version

Source review
Pass.
  • Reliable enough for the information being cited — pass
  • Consistent date formatting — pass
  • Consistent and proper reference formatting — pass
  • Appropriate wikilinks where applicable — pass
  • Spot checks on sources match what they are being cited for — pass

Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 15:44, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Add |first=Chuma |last=Uwechia to Ref13
  • Wikilink John Darnton in Ref14.
  • Wikilink University of California Press in Ref15.
  • Remove the (Nigeria) in Ref20
  • Add |first=Emmanuel |last=Oladesu to Ref25
  • Add |first=Emmanuel|last=Ugwu to Ref39
  • Add |date=5 December 2019 to Ref41
  • Add |first=Charles|last=Ajunwa to Ref42
  • Add |date=9 June 2024 to Ref43
  • Add |date=19 May 2023 to Ref44
  • Add |first=Peter|last=Uzoho to Ref69
  • Add |date=13 May 2024 to Ref70
  • This is optional: Adding Agency Reporter i.e News Agency of Nigeria to the author parameter for Ref72. Generally, I would advise you replace every source with no attributed writer to a source that has a byline. For informations such as the one in Ref71 and Ref72, is easy to get a source with a byline. Let me know what you think.

Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 16:23, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans Done, thank you! Channels and Punch reporting an election winner in their capacities as national mediums is reliable enough for me, hence, why I cited them. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:00, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. Pass. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 18:46, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Reading Beans Thank you so much for taking your time!!! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:10, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Tyla discography

[edit]
Nominator(s): dxneo (talk) 09:35, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

South African singer-songwriter Tyla's discography includes one studio album and two EPs. Her self-titled debut album features the singles "Water" which peaked at number 7 on the US Billboard Hot 100 and won the inaugural Grammy Award for Best African Music Performance, as well as other singles such as "Jump" and "Push 2 Start", among others.

This will mark my fifth nom, I guess. dxneo (talk) 09:35, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comments

[edit]

Comments

[edit]
  • "Tyla released her debut self-titled studio album on 22 March 2024, which incorporated her digital EP of the same name released on 1 December 2023, it debuted at number 24 on the US Billboard 200 chart" - the second comma should be a semi-colon (or alternatively make that part its own sentence)
  • Also does "it debuted" refer to the album or the EP? The wording is ambiguous
  • "In 2025, as Tyla prepared for debut mixtape's release" => "In 2025, as Tyla prepared for her debut mixtape's release"
  • " She was featured on "When I'm with You by Thai musician" - quote mark at end of song title is missing
  • "She remixed WizTheMc's "Show Me Love"" - pretty sure this should be "She sang on a remix of WizTheMc's "Show Me Love"" as I doubt she was the one who did the actual remixing
  • "though some noted her Coloured identity might affect her U.S. reception" - I don't think "coloured" needs a capital C mid-sentence
Coloured is a racial group, it should be in uppercase. dxneo (talk) 10:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • "In July 2025, Tyla announced a mixtape featuring "Bliss" and "Is It" via social media with a pre-save link." - as this mixtape apparently hasn't been released yet, I would be tempted to move this sentence to the end
I wanted to structure it the way it was announced and (will/would be) released. dxneo (talk) 10:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • In the EPs table you give the title of the more recent one as "WWP" but in other tables you refer to it as "We Wanna Party". Which is its actual title?
My apologies. dxneo (talk) 10:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. dxneo (talk) 10:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Octave

[edit]

Some comments on sourcing, not a full review:

  • A whole bunch of refs are missing archive links, I suggest running the IA bot.
These are likely for charts like Billboard, but since the archive doesn't automatically update after a song is added, I removed them. dxneo (talk) 10:17, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refs should be cased consistently as sentence or title per WP:CITEVAR.
Not sure what this is aimed at. Which refs are in error? dxneo (talk) 10:17, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hyphens used as dashes should be converted to dashes per MOS:CONFORM.
Done. However, this one is problematic since we copy and paste URLs and title from the source. dxneo (talk) 10:17, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Refs 10 and 97 are duplicate.
  • Refs 16 and 36 are duplicate.
  • Refs 21 and 40 are duplicate.
  • Ref 70 is the wrong link.
  • Inconsistent use of publisher parameter: some use it, some don't.
I've only used |publisher= on refs like this one, since it's clearly stated on the URL/article. dxneo (talk) 10:17, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref 10 should be Rolling Stone, not Rolling stone.

Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 09:02, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Dxneo for follow up. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:18, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello UpTheOctave! I have addressed all the issues you've raised and also left comments were necessary. Thank you for the review. dxneo (talk) 10:17, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Re: reference casing, per WP:CITEVAR, (part of WP:Citing sources and thus required by WP:FL?), we should use a consistent style of citation capitalisation. After this RfC, consensus was found that just copying the capitalisation used by a source is not a valid citation style. As such, all references should be consistently capitalised, be that in sentence case, title case, or an alternative.
Re: publishers, you have references like 8 and 13 that say "The Official South African Charts" for both work and publisher, which is redundant. Besides that, including the publisher parameter should either be done for all references or none; otherwise, we do not have a consistent style of citation as required by WP:CITESTYLE (another part of WP:Citing sources).
Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 13:11, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

76th Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards

[edit]
Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk 08:56, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating the 2024 Primetime Creative Arts Emmys for featured list promotion because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I followed how RunningTiger123 formatted the 2007, 2020, 2021, and 2022 ceremonies for this edition. Birdienest81talk 08:56, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • @RunningTiger123: Done - I marked up the area awards based on this list of winners, and I cleaned up the grammar in the category changes section to past tense. I based the grammar on similar sections in similar FL-quality Creative Arts Emmys lists. Hopefully, these changes satisfy your comments.
--Birdienest81talk 08:17, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OlifanofmrTennant

[edit]
  • No ratings data is present
  • There is no news source providing information of ratings for the Creative Arts Emmys ceremonies. While a portion of the event is broadcast on FXX, Nielsen doesn't usually report the ratings for this show.
  • "[Downtown Los Angeles], [California]" delink California per WP:GEOLINK (same with infobox)
  • Done
  • Delink "Only Murders in the Building: One Killer Question" and "Shōgun – The Making of Shōgun" as they arent articles and dont have a section on the series pages
  • Done
  • Ryan Gosling is listed as being nominated for "Host: Ryan Gosling". Peacock lists the episode as "Ryan Gosling: April 13, 2024" as does ScreenRant. IMDb says "Ryan Gosling/Chris Stapleton", as does TV Guide, lot of variety in what its called.
  • While those sources have different variations of what that specific episode was titled, for the sake of continuity and since there is no established official title to SNL episode, it is preferred based on previous Primetime Emmy Awards ceremony lists with featured status that the episode title that was submitted for consideration and therefore listed in the official PDF of nominations will be the one used in these type of articles.
  • Theres a MOS:DASH violation in Ceremony Information
  • I have difficulty locating where the MOS:DASH violation in that section. Is it within the body of the paragraph? Or is it in one of the references.
  • Add a Use American english template
  • Done
Thats what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 17:49, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@OlifanofmrTennant: - I have addressed your comments, but there are some points of contention underneath some points.
--Birdienest81talk 23:51, 10 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support I took care of the dash problem myself Olliefant (she/her) 03:07, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, could an Efn be added to note the other names for the SNL episode? Olliefant (she/her) 13:31, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • @OlifanofmrTennant: Done - I added a note to the other names of the episode with a disclaimed mentioning that the list will follow the title mentioned in the official press release by the TV Academy. I chose the Peacock and TV Guide ones since IMDb is normally not a reliable source and Screen Rant has not been confirmed as a reliable source.
--Birdienest81talk 09:57, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That works for me Olliefant (she/her) 17:04, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Candidates of the 2025 Australian federal election

[edit]
Nominator(s): GraziePrego (talk) 08:33, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it to be an interesting topic of a recently-concluded and (in my opinion) interesting election. GraziePrego (talk) 08:33, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

[edit]

History6042

[edit]

I will get a review in soon, History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:33, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

[edit]
  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.
  • Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:24, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you @MPGuy2824, I believe I have completed those changes. GraziePrego (talk) 10:53, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Bolding of text wouldn't be read by a screen reader. You'll have to mark incumbency (sitting members) and wins with different symbols.
    • rowscopes are needed for the "Summary by party" and "Disendorsements and resignations" tables too.
    • I wasn't a fan of the raw html in the Senate tables, so I tried replacing it in one of the cells with a template. Feel free to revert if you don't like it or it doesn't work for some reason.
    • The tables in the "Senate" section aren't standard tables (e.g. in the ACT subsection there, the first column isn't for "Sustainable Australia" only). I don't know how to overcome this (without changing the table structure), but maybe PresN might have a suggestion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:03, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Incumbency and wins are now marked with symbols, will do other changes. GraziePrego (talk) 07:36, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Rowscopes done and I'm fine with your template in the Senate tables :) I'll wait a little bit to see if PresN has a suggestion about how to change the Senate tables that have been done in a slightly unusual way :) GraziePrego (talk) 07:45, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Rowscopes done You still need to do it for the "Summary by party" table. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:13, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Done, thank you GraziePrego (talk) 02:07, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      The problem here is that the information isn't really a table (the columns have nothing to do with every row), you're just sticking boxes next to each other so that it doesn't take up a million rows in one skinny table. There's a way to indicate that it isn't a "data" table but a "presentation" table - (MOS:LTAB). I converted one table as an example. You add role=presentation to the table, drop the caption, change all '!' to '|', and since that killed the styling of the party cells I added in some. Just do the same for the rest of the Senate tables and I think you're good. --PresN 12:41, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      Done, thank you for showing me that example one :) GraziePrego (talk) 02:22, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of governors of Bauchi State

[edit]
Nominator(s): Ibjaja055 (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating List of governors of Bauchi State for Featured List status. The article presents a comprehensive chronological record of all military and civilian governors of the state from its creation in 1976 to the present. It is well-structured in a clear tabular format, supported by reliable references, and remains stable without rapid changes or disputes. The list meets the Featured List criteria of being comprehensive, well-written, verifiable, and stable, and I believe it merits recognition as a Featured List. Ibjaja055 (talk) 18:54, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reading Beans

[edit]

I am reviewing this version

Source review
Passed.
  • Reliable enough for the information being cited — pass
  • Consistent date formatting — pass
  • Consistent and proper reference formatting — pass
  • Appropriate wikilinks where applicable — pass
  • Spot checks on sources match what they are being cited for — pass

I’ll get this done before 24-48-hours. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 12:58, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Infobox says that the Governor can be addressed as “The Honourable”. I am not really into politics but isn’t this title reserved for members of the legislative body? I would encourage you to cite informations in the Infobox. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 13:00, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Reading Beans Thank you very much for your review. I have fixed it, kindly have a look now.Ibjaja055 (talk) 12:57, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There are a lot of unsourced information here and it’s making it hard to review (for me). I advise @Ibjaja055 to go through the article and fix the sourcing issues so that the body supports the lede. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 15:33, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Reading Beans I have fixed the issue with the use of proper in-line citations and I have also either removed or replaced some marginally reliable reliable references. Can you check again? Thank you. Ibjaja055 (talk) 05:31, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • There’s no page number in Ref2. Also wikilink Cambridge University Press. Also, since it’s a book change the date to |year=2019
  • Add |8 June 2023|newspaper=Premium Times to Ref3.
  • Change the newspaper parameter on Ref4 to |newspaper=The Guardian
  • Wikilink African Economic History in Ref5
  • You need to clarify that Ref6 is dissertation (see WP:THESIS). Use {{Cite thesis}}.
  • Add |year=2020 to Ref7.
  • Change the newspaper parameter in Ref8 to |newspaper=Business Day
  • I don’t know the reliability of Neptune Prime. Can you shed some light on it or better still, replace it?
  • Wikilink The New York Times in Ref10.
  • Wikilink Channels Television in Ref11.
  • Wikilink TheCable in Ref12.
  • Change the newspaper parameter in |newspaper=Blueprint in Ref13 and Ref14.
  • Ref15: the newspaper’s name is in the title. Seperate them and add |newspaper=Daily Trust to the cite template.
  • Add a date to Ref16 and change the newspaper parameter to |newspaper=Premium Times
  • Wikilink TheCable in Ref17.
  • Remove the |location= in Ref18.
  • Remove the author parameter in Ref19 and use |website=Ecoi.net in the website parameter.
  • Use |newspaper=Vanguard in Ref21&22.
  • Change the newspaper parameter to Premium Times in Ref33&34.
  • Change the newspaper parameter in Ref35 to ThisDay.

This is all for now before I move to the next. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 13:52, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reading Beans I have duly effected all the corrections. Thank you for the review. Can you take a look now? Ibjaja055 (talk) 16:28, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have fixed the remaining issues. I’ll do the spot checks later tonight. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 16:51, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ibjaja055, I couldn’t do the spotchecks as promised due to real life issues. From my spotchecks, only Ref1 failed verification. It made no mention of the Government House, being the residence of the governor. I believe there are sources out there that can verify this. Another suggestion; the first Northern Region section dived into a lot of federal politics that does not belong to this list. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 16:20, 25 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Reading Beans I have fixed your recommendation and I have also removed the failed source along with the claim. Can you check again now? Thank you. Ibjaja055 (talk) 04:59, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support on sources. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:11, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

VWF

[edit]
  • First subsection of the list needs to be "Northern Region"
  • Second subsection needs to be "North-Eastern State"
  • Third needs to be "Bauchi State"
  • Change table title of Bauchi State list from "Military, administrators and civilian governors of Bauchi State, Nigeria" to "Heads of the government of Bauchi State"
  • Change table title of Northeastern State list from "Military Administrators of the Northeastern Region, Nigeria" to "Military administrators of the Northeastern Region"
  • Website name of Citation number 18 needs to be "European Country of Origin Information Network"
  • Change the |title= of citation number 22 from PROFILE to Profile.
  • Do the same for citation number 10
  • For citation number 6, modify the lastnames of the authors, their last names are Ota, Ecoma and Wambu. Either remove the initials entirely or add them to the firstnames instead.
  • For citation number 14, remove the "Daily Trust" in the title.
  • In both tables, remove the "No" column; it serves no purpose.
  • The "! scope="row"" in the No. column before, add it to the Governors' name such that, for the Governors' name, you now have ! scope="row" |Rasheed Adisa Raji. Take note that I removed the boldface from the name. This makes it clear that this is the primary column.
  • The Bauchi State list table is pretty confusing. The "Notes" column serves no purpose. The political parties also need to be cited. Why not adopt the methods used in other similar lists, as in List of governors of Rivers State? Or remove the Note column and replace it with Political Party. The Tenure needs to be cited too, just repeat the citations in the prose that verify it. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:21, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Pinging @Ibjaja055 for follow up. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:22, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Hey man im josh thank you for pinging me. I will review and get back ASAP! Ibjaja055 (talk) 22:32, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @Vanderwaalforces I have reviewed and updated the article with your recommendations. Can you check now?

List of Great Northern route stations

[edit]
Nominator(s): JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 23:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a station list for the corresponding Great Northern route, which I created about a month ago and have been working on since. This is my first FLC so do let me know if I have done / am doing anything wrong. Thanks in advance, JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 23:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Placeholder

[edit]
  • I'll do a full review shortly but one drive-by comment: Italicised lines are those that are not constituent parts of the Great Northern route. is not compliant with accessibility requirements because screen readers used by people with vision issues won't read out that the text is italicised -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:37, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Any suggestions as to an alternative? Quite difficult to think of a way of doing it that's accessible but not obtrusive. The article does mention the constituent lines (Cambridge line, East Coast Main Line, Fen line, Hertford Loop line, Northern City line) and if you want I can repeat that before the start of each table as clarification for those unable to know where the italics are. JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 19:06, 17 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    You can use a symbol instead of/in addition to the italics. See List of municipalities in Jaén which uses a color and a symbol. Make sure to use a legend too when you do this. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:35, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done as a symbol before each line and no more italics.
    I wouldn't say a colour is necessary but a symbol would work -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

More comments

[edit]
  • Link all the stations named in the lead
    • Done
  • "Govia Thameslink Railway only share eight stations [...] this will rise to six" - maths doesn't seem to be right here
    • Fixed
  • "confirmed to have funded allocated to them" - funding, surely?
    • Fixed
  • "Half of the eighteen stations that have been closed did so" => "Half of the eighteen stations that have closed did so" (passive/active verbs don't work as it stands)
    • Fixed
  • "London Borough of Enfieldno surface" looks odd and I presume is a typo of some kind
    • Fixed
  • Notes d, f, j are not sentences so doesn't need full stops
    • Done
  • There are some duplicate notes which can be combined -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:25, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    • Fixed

Hope that's everything. Thanks for the comments and let me know anything else that needs doing. JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 17:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments, JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 17:03, 19 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

[edit]
  • Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
    • Done
  • Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Year becomes !scope=col | Year. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead. Some of your columns have this, but not all.
    • Done
  • Tables need row scopes on the "primary" column for each row, which in combination with column scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Row scopes can be added by adding !scope=row to each primary cell, e.g. | 1987 becomes !scope=row | 1987 (on its own line). If

the cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead.

Drive by comments by Mattximus
Surely a featured list on a route should have a map of the route? Is there any metro map style maps available? I feel this is a critical piece for this list to pass. Mattximus (talk) 16:19, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The map on Great Northern route is wrong; I will make a new one now. JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 20:45, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Done. JacobTheRox(talk | contributions) 21:12, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

[edit]

Octave

[edit]

I'll do the source review for this one, poke me if I don't post anything in a couple days. UpTheOctave! • 8va? 22:29, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed Special:Permalink/1312492792

Reliability

  • What makes this particular newsletter from RailFuture a reliable source?
  • What makes Disused Stations a reliable source?
  • Other sources look fine for reliability.

Consistency

  • Inconsistent use of archive links for websites.
  • Inconsistent linking of websites and publishers. Note that WP:DUPLINK does not apply to reference sections.
  • Inconsistent use of publisher parameter for book sources.
  • Inconsistent casing of reference titles, please use sentence or title case per WP:CITEVAR.
  • Inconsistent segmentation of ISBNs.
  • Inconsistent use of Govia Thameslink Railway vs. Great Northern for pages on the same website.
  • Date format looks consistent.

Other comments

  • Since you've used archive links, {{cite web}} presumes the links are dead. For those that are still live, please add |url-status=live.
  • Ref 2: needs page number.
  • Ref 5: where are you seeing 31 March 2010 here? I can only see the month and year.
  • Ref 6: similarly, where are you seeing a date?
  • Ref 8: ditto above.
  • Ref 10: where are you seeing an author.
  • Ref 11: gives a 404.
  • Ref 12: link Railfuture.
  • Ref 14: missing authors.
  • Ref 15: June is not the date of publication, merely the latest news.
  • Ref 18: I think ISBN would suffice as far as identifiers go; can probably drop the "ltd." from publisher.
  • Ref 19: I would link Cambridgeshire Live.
  • Ref 45: link London Transport (brand).
  • Ref 46: missing author.
  • Ref 47: no need to repeat British Transport Commission.
  • Ref 51: missing page numbers.

Spotchecks will be done after these comments are dealt with, as some references may need to be removed. Best, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 17:26, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Victorious discography

[edit]
Nominator(s): Shoot for the Stars (talk) 21:58, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the FL criteria. The list has reliable sources and I followed other discographies that are FL. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 21:58, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by comment

[edit]

Comments

[edit]
  • "Victorious is an American television show [...] It focused" - both verbs should be in the present tense
  • Notes a, b and c are not full sentences so they don't need full stops
  • That's all I got - great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:41, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ChrisTheDude Fixed. I appreciate the comments. Let me know if anything else needs to be fixed. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 19:52, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Image review

[edit]

Well, there's only one image, so I'll say this:

  • It needs alt text
  • It needs a better description on Commons

Both are relatively easy fixes. I'll pass it once they are fixed. Icepinner 14:06, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Icepinner: Fixed. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 18:36, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Passing image review. Icepinner 00:27, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by citation comments

[edit]

Not a full review, just some issues to sort:

  • There are several CS1 citation templates with |url-status=bot: unknown parameters, these should be assessed and changed to another value listed at Template:Cite web#csdoc urlstatus.
  • You have a mixed use of Capitalising Every Word, Sentence case, and Title Case in citation titles: this should be standardised per WP:CITEVAR.
  • Hyphens as dashes should be converted to dashes per MOS:CONFORM.
  • Ref 40 is mising an archive.

Best, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 17:11, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@UpTheOctave!: Does it look good to you? Shoot for the Stars (talk) 03:39, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There's still a couple missing archive links (refs 30 and 41) and some sentence case refs (mainly the RIAA and BPI refs). Dashes and bot parameters look fine now. UpTheOctave! • 8va? 07:54, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@UpTheOctave!:: How does it look now? Shoot for the Stars (talk) 21:55, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Archives are all good, RIAA and BPI should be in the for British/American Single Certifications for title case though. UpTheOctave! • 8va? 23:16, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@UpTheOctave!: Can you tell me what you mean by this? I am confused. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 06:22, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:CITEVAR, which is part of WP:Citing sources and thus required by WP:FL?, we should use a consistent style of citation capitalisation. After this RfC, consensus was found that just copying the capitalisation used by a source is not a valid citation style. When capitalising citations, there are two main ways to do it. You can have title case (capitalising everything except minor words: e.g. "The Quick Brown Fox Jumps over the Lazy Dog") or sentence case (capitalising only first word: e.g. "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog"). You should pick one of these for all citations. UpTheOctave! • 8va? 13:09, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of protected areas of Peru

[edit]
Nominator(s): JustEMV (talk) 17:15, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everyone! I was inspired by the recent WHS featured lists. For my first FLC nomination, I have chosen Peru, one of the most biodiverse countries in the world. I apologize if I have overlooked anything. Any review or feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thank you all in advance! JustEMV (talk) 17:15, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

History6042

[edit]

Easternsahara

[edit]
  • ill do a review soon
    Thank you Easternsahara! Looking forward to your review. :) JustEMV🦙 (talk) 01:12, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please add an engvar template to deter article deterioration
  • File:Mapa de Áreas Naturales Protegidas de Administración Nacional a setiembre de 2024 (cropped).jpg - CC BY 4.0 thank you very much for this
  • File:Peru, mount Huascaran.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Manu National Park-71.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Cordillera Azul National Park - ZooKeys-277-069-g005.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Paracas National Reserve. Ica, Peru.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:P1030590 Pérou, Reserva Nacional Salinas y Aguada Blanca, premières vigognes à l'état sauvage (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • File:Pacaya Samiria Marañon River (66217327).jpeg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Bosque de Piedras (Huayllay). 3.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Puya raimondii en la Reserva Nacional de Calipuy (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Machu Picchu, Peru.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • File:Aves en Pantanos.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Panorama Cotahuasi.jpg - PD
  • File:Panoramic view of the Reserva Comunal El Sira.jpg - CC0
  • File:Atalaya to Pantiacolla Lodge (23821713805).jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • File:Alto Mayo 598-602mod.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Cordillera huayhuash at sunny day.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Lago Menor o Huiñamarca Perú Bolivia Satelital map 68.85829W 16.png - PD
  • File:Imponente Volcán Yucamani.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Choquequirao - 5621104428.jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:View of Huacachina.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • File:Panguana-Lupuna-2008-2.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
  • File:Área de conservación privada Abra Málaga Thastayoc-Royal Cinclodes 0-21.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Fotografía sobre el Área de Conservación Privada Campo Verde en Ucayali 05.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Flag of Peru (state).svg - PD
  • I think that the first image, the map, could use more descriptive text. As the policy which History5042 cited says "With maps, diagrams and charts, the colour, position, and size of elements are not important. Instead, concentrate on the information being presented". Right now, you just have "Map of Peru showing the distribution of national protected areas by category:" which does not describe the information being presented. Instead just put the general location of everything, like "national parks are mostly found in the east and north of peru (just an example idk if its right)" Specify the general trend and indicate if there are outliers. This will be tedious but it is necessary
  • otherwise the alt text looks quite good and detailed, does not just repreat the caption.
  • the sronly text looks good but I don't know if it is necessary to specify "of Peru" on a page entirely and only about peru?
  • future source and prose review perhaps coming, i will pass image review once my concerns are addressed. I would like to thank you for countering systemic bias by contributing to this page.
  • Also I don't see the point of adding abbreviations to the legend for each of the tables, and I'll be removing some of the elements from the legend of those tables which don't use it.
    Thanks again. I’ll do the rest this weekend; in the meantime, I’ve added the engvar template and removed “of Peru” from the sronly text. JustEMV🦙 (talk) 12:49, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Done. Please let me know if the alt caption looks good now or if it still needs any refinement. JustEMV🦙 (talk) 02:09, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

More comments

  • Should "National System of State‑Protected Natural Areas" be redlinked? I searched for it on spanish wikipedia, but couldn't find anything.
  • Should "Protected Natural Areas Day" be redlinked?
  • "The National System of State-Protected Natural Areas is the network of nationally administered protected areas managed by the National Service of Natural Protected Areas under the Ministry of the Environment. " → "The National System of State-Protected Natural Areas (is the only network of nationally administered protected areas, managed by the National Service of Natural Protected Areas which is under the Ministry of the Environment."
  • "Its objective" Are you talking about the objective of the Ministry of the Environment, the National System of State-Protected Natural Areas, or the National Service of Natural Protected Areas? Please phrase it in a clearer way
  • I think everything else is fine but what does the em dash in the column represent? Does it mean that the value is unknown or that it is zero? At first I thought the latter but then saw 0 being used in one of the tables so could you include this in the legend for the tables that use them.
    Done Easternsahara, thank you for the suggestions. I did not add redlinks for National System of State-Protected Natural Areas or Protected Natural Areas Day, as I don’t think they are notable enough for standalone articles per WP:REDLINK. I also replaced the em dashes in the visitor numbers column with “Unknown” (the source is given in the column head), following the approach used in this recent FL. JustEMV🦙 (talk) 03:09, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it looks good. I will pass image review and endorse the promotion of the list 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 13:05, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you JustEMV🦙 (talk) 13:38, 16 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Reywas92
  • Can you add descriptions to at least the national parks and ideally some of the other categories? They don't have to be more than a sentence or two each, but the list seems uninformative compared to other FLs like List of national parks of Canada, List of national forests of the United States, and others at Wikipedia:Featured lists#Nature reserves and conservation areas.
  • "Peru comprises 256 protected natural areas" –> "Peru has..." The country comprises a lot more than the protected areas
  • "managed nationally by SINANPE" It seems that SERNANP manages the SINANPE, as the SINANPE is just the set of places that doesn't do management
  • "Areas which" -> "Areas, which"
  • Remove "View of" in image caption since all photos are implied to be views
  • The key for purple in the National Reserve section says "park"
  • The visitation statistic for Machu Picchu seems very wrong.
  • None of the private conservation areas have wikilinks, but there should be at least one in the table since Panguana is linked in an image caption. Same for regional conservation areas – even if there's not an article for Huacachina Lagoon Regional Conservation Area, a link to Huacachina would be appropriate. Please check if any others should be linked somewhere.

Reywas92Talk 01:10, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Reywas92, I’ve already implemented most of the suggestions. Regarding the Machu Picchu statistic, I included the one from SERNANP, which I believe doesn’t count citadel visitors (over 1.5 million), as those are managed by the Ministry of Culture. I’ve added an explanatory footnote to clarify that. Let me know if it should be handled differently. JustEMV🦙 (talk) 21:33, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Reywas92 I’ve applied all suggestions except the first about descriptions. Since the list has 256 entries, adding a sentence for each could bloat the page, I think a subarticle (e.g. List of national parks of Peru) may work better, similar to the FL List of areas in the United States National Park System That said, I’ve drafted short descriptions for the national parks in my sandbox and can add them here if still necessary, or move them to a new article. Thanks again for the review! JustEMV🦙 (talk) 02:23, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Source review (9/24/25)

[edit]
  • I recommend that you substitute National Service of Natural Protected Areas for SERNANP in the citations.
  • Titles need to be in case format even if the original source is in all capitals. So, for example: "Declaran el 17 de octubre de cada año como "Día de las Áreas Naturales Protegidas del Perú" RESOLUCIÓN SUPREMA N° 030-2019-MINAM" – you will need to change that to Resolución Suprema.
  • Random spot check of sources checks out.

User:JustEMV: Just a few cosmetic changes to the formatting of some of your citations and then I will be happy to sign off on your source review. Just let me know when you are finished. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:46, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bgsu98 Done. Thanks for the source review! Happy to fix anything else if needed. JustEMV🦙 (talk) 00:48, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

User:JustEMV: Whoops, I can see now how this might have been confusing. I meant that you should use National Service of Natural Protected Areas instead of an acronym (SERNANP). Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:54, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the misunderstanding. Done! JustEMV🦙 (talk) 02:31, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 05:41, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of works by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie

[edit]
Nominator(s): Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:47, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the FL criteria. I have worked extensively on this list. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:47, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reading Beans

[edit]

I am reviewing this version

Source review
Passed.
  • Reliable enough for the information being cited — pass
  • Consistent date formatting — pass
  • Consistent and proper reference formatting — pass
  • Appropriate wikilinks where applicable — pass
  • Spot checks on sources match what they are being cited for — pass

SafariScribe, does Ref 13 cover the informations for every information from where it’s located to the very bottom? Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 16:38, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 03:56, 21 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support on sources. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 04:59, 26 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LEvalyn

[edit]

Reconrabbit

[edit]

(Single) image review:

  • File:Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (2015).png: CC-BY 3.0 license, as it is taken from a Youtube video. The video is from an institution that can reasonably be expected to be able to release the footage under this license. Has alt text.

Image review passed.

  • "You in America" (2001). Zoetrope: All-Story: no page number here?
    There was no page number per source, instead a bracket that indicates it was published online not print.
  • Why red-link "On Monday Last Week"?
    Delinked
  • Is there any context to the following lectures/speeches that could be added (ex., TEDx talk, lecture, TED talk):
    • The Danger of a Single Story[19]
    • To Instruct and Delight: A Case for Realist Literature[20]
    • We Should All Be Feminists[21]
    No, there isn't. However I added dates to show more context.

That's all I have. If any of these shouldn't be changed (I am not as familiar with FLs of bibliographies) then just let me know. -- Reconrabbit 21:05, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reconrabbit, done. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 21:28, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay! I give my support. -- Reconrabbit 14:18, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support simongraham

[edit]

@Safari Scribe Excellent work. Two comments from me:

  1. Suggest using a consistent ISBN format (for example, standardising on ISBN-13 with hyphens, as this is the most common in the article).
  2. Suggest wilinking the newspapers and journals in which her publications appear (such as The Guardian).

Please ping me if you have any questions. simongraham (talk) 22:13, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. @simongraham I didn't see a hyphen (ed)ISBN for one poetry collection. Again, the wikilinking is good but I think it may cause over-linking, for example, there are many articles published in The Guardian, when we wikilink all The Guardian, it mayn't seem so good. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:42, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Safari Scribe Great work. I believe that there is also 9781861064226. I agree linking more than one instance would be excessive. Currently many, including Granta, The New York Times, The New Yorker The Washington Post (which also called Washington Post) are not wikilinked at all. I suggest it may be worth looking at them all. I also note that some do not have page numbers. Is that because they are only available online? simongraham (talk) 15:46, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Simongraham Thank you for your comment, however, I can't find any ISBN-13 with hyphen for that one. I will also wikilink as you mentioned above. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 16:38, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have wikilinked them. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:16, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Safari Scribe Excellent work. I understand that hyphenation in ISBN can be a minefield. You may want to use a hyphenator tool[2] if it is not clearly in the source itself. simongraham (talk) 19:42, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Simongraham, I have hyphenated it. Thanks for the tool. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:47, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Safari Scribe Excellent. Happy to support. simongraham (talk) 19:59, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by sourcing comments

[edit]

Some supplementary comments on sourcing (Special:Diff/1313549757):

  • Refs 15, 16, 17, 18, and 25 are duplicate.
    refilled sources
  • What make Times Now a reliable source?
    Removed and adjusted article
  • Standardise casing per WP:CITEVAR, we currently have a mix of sentence and title.
    done
  • Refs 7, 8 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24 are all missing archives.
    I don't really think it matters. It's not working when I used the Archive Way back Machine
  • Incorrect title for ref 7: use the title at the page, not the one citation tool spits out.

Thanks, UpTheOctave! • 8va? 08:42, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@UpTheOctave! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:49, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
These look fine now, aside from archiving. Ideally, these should be backed up to prevent link-rot. I tried to run the IA Bot but it gave me a 504, so this seems fine as well for now. UpTheOctave! • 8va? 20:35, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for removal

[edit]

Commissioner's Historic Achievement Award

[edit]
Notified: Killervogel5, Staxringold, WikiProject Baseball

I am nominating this for featured list removal because items in this list mostly read as a record of career achievements. But the award, as the name states, is given for a specific "historic achievement".

For example, the Sammy Sosa row mentions his 1998 MVP, 66 home runs, and three career 60 home run seasons. But it does NOT mention the actual historic achievement for which Sosa was specifically given the award: hitting 62 home runs, which tied McGwire for the single-season home run record and passed the longstanding Roger Maris record of 61. The McGwire row was similar until I recently changed it to refer specifically to his 62nd home run.

Ohtani's row is a large summary of his four-year career, but barely mentions why he was actually awarded the trophy in 2001. The trophy was awarded not for his 2018 Rookie of the Year, 2019 Tommy John surgery, or 2021 MVP. It was awarded by the Commissioner for "becoming the sport’s first two-way All-Star — starting in the All-Star game as both a pitcher and a designated hitter."

This list does not comprehensively cover the subject and its defined scope. PK-WIKI (talk) 17:14, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nominator Killervogel5 is long gone. Page creator me can step in some. You're right that many of the descriptions need to be changed. The Sosa row includes things that happened after he received the award. I found that MLB.com does have a list of the specific achievements the award is given for:
  • 2021: Shohei Ohtani for his historic season as a two-way player, including starting the All-Star Game as both a pitcher and designated hitter.
  • 2014: The retiring Derek Jeter for his numerous all-time postseason records (hits, runs, total bases).
  • 2014: Vin Scully on his 65 years of service to baseball.
  • 2013: Mariano Rivera, who retired as the all-time saves leader.
  • 2011: Ken Griffey Jr., on his great career in baseball and for being one of the most popular players of all-time.
  • 2007: Rachel Robinson, on the 60th anniversary of her husband’s breaking of the color barrier and for her advancement of his legacy.
  • 2006: Roberto Clemente, posthumously, during the 2006 All-Star Game in Pittsburgh and presented to his wife, Vera, and their family.
  • 2005: Ichiro Suzuki for his record-breaking hit total achieved in the 2004 season, surpassing George Sisler.
  • 2004: Roger Clemens for his 300th win and record Cy Young Award total.
  • 2001: The Seattle Mariners for their record-tying 116-win regular season.
  • 2001: The retiring Tony Gwynn for his record-tying eight NL batting titles.
  • 2001: Rickey Henderson for his all-time career records in stolen bases, walks and runs.
  • 2001: Barry Bonds for his single-season home run record.
  • 1998: Both Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa for their record-breaking single-season home run-record chase.
  • 1998: Cal Ripken Jr. in commemoration of the end of his legendary Iron Man streak.
  • Some of these are very specific. Others (Griffey especially) are more broad. Clemente's doesn't directly mention his achievements at all, and the contemporaneous reference just broadly talks about how great he was. I agree this can be improved and perhaps I can achieve that to save FL status. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:33, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    There's a mistake there on Ripken. He ended his streak in 1998, but got the award in 2001, not 1998. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:43, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    That MLB page is ok as a broad overview, but somewhat incorrect in the specifics. "1998: Both Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa for their record-breaking single-season home run-record chase." Not really. It was awarded to McGwire the day he hit 62. Then awkwardly awarded to Sosa the next week for tying 62. But by the time the trophy was awarded, McGwire had already passed him again. The MLB page somewhat indicates it was an end-of-season dual award for "the chase" rather than for the specific "historic achievements". PK-WIKI (talk) 17:47, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Moons of Jupiter

[edit]
Notified: RandomCritic, Kwamikagami, WikiProject Astronomy

I am nominating this for featured list removal because the prose in this 'list' completely outnumbers the list by orders of magnitude, this is probably Featured Article or at least Good Article worthy, but definitely not a FL due to failing the list part of the criteria. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 04:34, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

For similar reasons I would also like to nominate the following lists: Moons of Saturn, Moons of Uranus, Moons of Neptune 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 11:38, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That we allow multi-nominations for media season lists while we work through them is a special, agreed upon case; this nomination cannot cover multiple lists. --PresN 11:44, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: the 97-row table is scrollable; if you turn that off so that it can fill out vertically (and horizontally), the prose to table ratio is about 60%/40%, or 55/45 if you make the font full-sized. Also note that you have to actually notify the people/projects that you list above, not just put their names here; I did not see any evidence that you did. --PresN 11:42, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Iowa tornadoes

[edit]
Notified: EF5, Easternsahara, ActuallyElite, WikiProject Weather

I've nominated this list because I don't believe it was properly scrutinized during the review process and simply is not up to FL levels as of right now. See Talk:List of Iowa tornadoes for more specifics, but what's on the table as I type this are a large table cited to a user-generated source (or one that can't be proved not to be UGC, anyway), a significant lack of comprehension listing of data that does exist in reliable sources and can be put together in an afternoon, arbitrary inclusion candidates, and general weird formatting throughout, especially in image placement and citations in the lede, the sort I wouldn't expect from featured content. Departure– (talk) 23:31, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify a few points:
  • By "arbitrary", I mean the line in the sand being "intense tornadoes" being the only ones included and all others being completely discarded. No reason for this is given in the article itself.
    • Typically, lists that include large amounts of tornadoes draw the line at "intense tornadoes" (F3/equivalent), such as Tornadoes in Oklahoma, but again, no reason given. The only actual line I could think of a justification for would be "significant tornadoes" (F2/equivalent), as those are what expert of tornado record-keeping Thomas P. Grazulis uses in his Significant tornadoes line of books.
    • In addition, this list is missing numerous tornadoes within the "intense" range.
  • Details about my UGC concern are further detailed at Talk:List of Iowa tornadoes#Tornado Paths source, but the short version is that a source cited in a table is listed as published by ArcGIS with no credits. ArcGIS is a software at the end of the day, and while it likely was produced by a reliable source (NWS or NOAA), there's no evidence beyond anecdotal comments about the scale of the source.
    • In addition, the source is almost certainly a tertiary source to be avoided in favor of a more focused source.
  • There is some weird formatting right outside the lede. The lede itself also doesn't follow MOS:LEDE, with information in the opening not present in the body (though, with a citation).
  • Sourcing in general has been brought up on the talk page as being far from featured-level. One was revealed to likely be a blog.
  • More details than I can provide quickly here can be found on the article's talk page at the anchor Talk:List of Iowa tornadoes#What in the heck?. Departure– (talk) 23:45, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
One more note: List of Iowa tornadoes is currently scheduled to appear as Today's featured list starting October 6. Departure– (talk) 23:48, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per my talk page comments. As much as I hate to delist an article as recent as this, it simply isn’t up to par. EF5 01:56, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of retired Pacific typhoon names

[edit]
Notified: Jason Rees, WikiProject Weather

I am nominating this for featured list removal because there's several typhoons that are left unsourced, especially the 2020s typhoons. According to Wikipedia:Featured list criteria, it seems like it fails at Number 3, part b; "Statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations." Unless the issue gets fixed, these unsourced claims are seriously hurting the FA status of this article. Hoguert (talk) 00:19, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hoguert: Quick note, you tagged Jason Rees and WikiProject Weather as having been notified, but I don't see that you actually did notify them; please do to increase the chance that this list gets fixed. --PresN 12:02, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am aware of this FLC having seen it on my watchlist and will see what I can do in the coming days to bring it up to scratch.Jason Rees (talk) 16:37, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Update: I have done a lot of weeding on the List of retired Philippine typhoon names and this list today and am pleased to report that the death/damage totals from the 2020s are all sourced/referenced, while all retired names and intensity information is sourced. On the overall list in particular, the damage totals will need further work to incorporate death/damage totals from outside of the Philippines, but that's a job for another night.Jason Rees (talk) 02:14, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I will withdraw from this after the issues are addressed, and so far, you're doing a good job fixing the problems. Hoguert (talk) 00:15, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Update - Over the last week or so, I have done more and more weeding on the Philippine list and now have all the Philippine death/damage totals from Reming (Durian) in 2006 sourced back to the NCDC. Some of these death/damage totals have already been incorporated into the overall article, while I plan on getting them into the main overall article over the next few days.Jason Rees (talk) 10:26, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How I Met Your Mother season 1

[edit]
Notified: Haha169, WikiProject Television

Continuing with TV season nominations (see the recent FLRC log), this article is being nominated for FLRC as the consensus has shifted to promoting these lists through GAN/FAC. This nomination is not intended to discuss the article's quality – it's actually in reasonably good shape, and I could see it passing GAN fairly easily. RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:11, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delist. Season articles are not lists. If they appear as a list, that is only because they lack much of the content needed. As can be seen by this article, it's clearly more than a list. Gonnym (talk) 07:44, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Desperate Housewives season 1

[edit]

Due to the consensus against "Episodes in a season" being a list or being nominated for featured list status, I am nominating this for deletion. The article itself seems to be in good shape, but that is irrelevant and thus I have not checked it for comprehensiveness. I decided to nominate this to speed up the process of delisting all the 'season' lists, thanks. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 00:22, 24 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates&oldid=1314933648"